Gender vs Sex

[Bigbrog]

30 minutes ago, ThreePointTakedown said:

 

Can you just go back to addressing my points? We had a decent back and forth there for a minute. I like the number system you incorporated. Made it easier to craft responses. 

Why pivot away to this? Its just not a good look. 

But since you asked. 

Cooked - you can't really refute my points or the facts I've cited to support them

Outmatched - the tools I use to gather information and discern reliable sources is better than yours. That's why my points are better. 

Immature - What you are sensing as immaturity is more born out of frustration. You probably won't agree but you know I post on here quite a bit. Lately, more in spurts than on a consistent basis. In my history, there are maybe half a dozen accounts, you being one of them, that seem to utilize the same, in my opinion, dishonest tactics in discussion. I get frustrated with them. Then the conversation goes off the rails. Which is what I am guessing was the intended effect. Because as I've mentioned before when confronted with facts and data, conservative points cannot hold up. Its just that simple. Hence the dishonest tactics. You've all learned them from pundits. To talk but not really engage, especially when it will make your opinion look bad. Why not just change your opinion? If its wrong and bad and harmful, just change it? But as we have learned there are incentives to peddling certain ideas. They're usually financial. People on Fox(not)News are hoping to sell a book or get hired as the secretary of Defense or US Attorney or FBI Director so it behooves them to tell obvious lies NOW so they can get a promotion and a bigger paycheck tomorrow. But what is your motivation? Have you investigated that? 

Overinflated sense of self - Not sure what you mean here. I'm sensing a bit of projection. Because all I do is type out my opinions. Opinions based on facts or reliable data that I have read or have come across through other means. Means that I have investigated and considered to be consistently reliable. If relaying information that I feel is reliable and accurate makes you think I have an overinflated sense of self and intelligence, I think that's a YOU problem. But I'd be happy to discuss why you think I'm wrong.

Names - I guess that's fair. Constantly using the laugh emoji doesn't really give you as  high of ground on this point tho. But as far as calling you a liar and being dishonest. I think I articulate good reasons. If you disagree please point out where you think I was wrong. 

How I portray myself - As someone that knows things. If they don't know things they can look them up and determine if that source is reliable or not. That I can use words correctly. I'll bet you can't see how your statement says about you. YOU think that a person that does all the things I listed above, is bad or wrong. That even trying to make you better in your thinking is bad or wrong. That trying to fix a broken system by helping others see that it even exists in the first place, then getting mocked for it, is bad and wrong. I pity anyone that you have an influence on because your inferiority complex, that is obviously on display with that statement, is probably manifesting in ways that are quite harmful. I hope you have the courage to address it. Likely as not you'll just come back with a cope-laugh emoji as is your schtick. 

But again, I think this is all a pivot because you don't want to continue the conversation. I wouldn't either if your whole point was to taunt me about not having facts. Then when I present obvious defeaters for your points. Then continuing to taunt me would start to make you look bad and dishonest. Sort of like what I've been saying this whole time. 

But you do you. 

 

And once again....  

 HAPPY PRIDE XOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOX

  Thank you for confirming all my points!  

By the way...you talk about having constructive back and forth but you only want it one way...your way and only your opinions needing to be confirmed (thanks for admitting you do nothing but give your opinion while trying to pass it off as "fact").  I could sit here all day and go back and forth point by point but you continually have shown over and over that you are unable to do so and have to resort to immature name calling and weird inferences about how you all of a sudden know what my "true meaning is" and call some 'ism or 'phobe of some kind. I choose not to have a back and forth with someone who does that.  If you truly want to know what a mature back and forth usually looks like with someone who has a different opinion read Denny Decks posts. 

[ThreePointTakedown]

20 minutes ago, Bigbrog said:

  Thank you for confirming all my points!  

By the way...you talk about having constructive back and forth but you only want it one way...your way and only your opinions needing to be confirmed (thanks for admitting you do nothing but give your opinion while trying to pass it off as "fact").  I could sit here all day and go back and forth point by point but you continually have shown over and over that you are unable to do so and have to resort to immature name calling and weird inferences about how you all of a sudden know what my "true meaning is" and call some 'ism or 'phobe of some kind. I choose not to have a back and forth with someone who does that.  If you truly want to know what a mature back and forth usually looks like with someone who has a different opinion read Denny Decks posts. 

Address the facts that you asked for and that I provided. 

You taunted yourself into a corner and now you need to run to save your ego. 

You're scared. Everyone can see it. This is S.O.P. for conservatives losing a debate. 

I love it when you cope-laugh.

You work so hard to remain an ignorant bigot. Why?

And once again....  

 HAPPY PRIDE XOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOX

[Scouts Honor]

why do you work to be such a normaphobe

[JimmySpeaks]

On 3/26/2026 at 7:43 PM, Balthazar said:

Do you have any hobby other than being a bigoted piece of shit?

Look at the “new groomer” with 16 comments and an opinion.  Bahahahaahhahaha

being against permanently changing a child’s body parts is far from being bigoted.  Being for it makes you a sick f u k.  

Edited August 14 by JimmySpeaks

[JimmySpeaks]

1 hour ago, ThreePointTakedown said:

 

Address the facts that you asked for and that I provided. 

You taunted yourself into a corner and now you need to run to save your ego. 

You're scared. Everyone can see it. This is S.O.P. for conservatives losing a debate. 

I love it when you cope-laugh.

You work so hard to remain an ignorant bigot. Why?

And once again....  

 HAPPY PRIDE XOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOX

Everyone on here sees one thing. You supporting changing kids bodies when science says not to.  Its banned in most places in the world for a reason. Psychotherapy is the only thing that needs to be done for them.  You certainly can use some psychotherapy. Now get back to losing every argument you attempt to win. 

[Bigbrog]

21 hours ago, ThreePointTakedown said:

 

Address the facts that you asked for and that I provided. 

You taunted yourself into a corner and now you need to run to save your ego. 

You're scared. Everyone can see it. This is S.O.P. for conservatives losing a debate. 

I love it when you cope-laugh.

You work so hard to remain an ignorant bigot. Why?

And once again....  

 HAPPY PRIDE XOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOXOX

And additional confirmation of what I said in my post. Great diagnosis by the way. 

[Lipdrag]

I think they need to change the name from WNBA to  PPPNBA.  This solves 2 problems: 

1 - no need to define the W.

2 - PPP (Potentially Pregnant Person) stops White, Kanter, and all other men from joining regardless of how feminine they feel or how much estrogen they imbibe, inject, inhale, ingest, or otherwise intake.

3 - Free Bonus - it even uses woke terminology.

Wait, there's more! Added bonus, the first P can also mean Possibly, Probably, Practically, Palpably, Pre, and Past and achieve the same goals.  Talk about insane inclusivity in a league name!!!   PPPNBA.

This isn't difficult, ladies.

You're welcome.

[Scouts Honor]

 

[Scouts Honor]

 

[Scouts Honor]

i think normal humans should make sure that trans honor their preferred pronouns:

alive/here

 

 

[Scouts Honor]

trans women are so violent...

 

b/c they are men

 

[ThreePointTakedown]

1 hour ago, Scouts Honor said:

trans women are so violent...

 

b/c they are men

 

Sounds like a snowflake. 
Since you’re simping for them you must be a snowflake too. 
 

Best of luck with that. 
 

Trans people are here to stay. Numbers will grow. Acceptance will grow as well. 
That you grind your teeth at the thought of people being accepted as they are means you’re a hateful bigot. 
 

Only one of those things might change and it’s not the pattern of trans people. 
 

You lose. Your kind always does on these issues. I’ve mentioned this before. You should believe me. You know it’s true. 

[Scouts Honor]

says the simping snowflake

[Bigbrog]

9 hours ago, ThreePointTakedown said:

Sounds like a snowflake. 
Since you’re simping for them you must be a snowflake too. 
 

Best of luck with that. 
 

Trans people are here to stay. Numbers will grow. Acceptance will grow as well. 
That you grind your teeth at the thought of people being accepted as they are means you’re a hateful bigot. 
 

Only one of those things might change and it’s not the pattern of trans people. 
 

You lose. Your kind always does on these issues. I’ve mentioned this before. You should believe me. You know it’s true. 

First...who on here isn't accepting of trans people?  

Second, if a trans person dies something wrong are people not supposed to call it out just because they are trans?

 

[Scouts Honor]

yes, it's transphobic to call out trans people

it's islamophobic to call out muslims

you want to say something about straights? whites? christians?

no problem.

nothing will happen to you.

but if you say something about trans/muslims/leftist cult people?

watch out

and not just for the backlash in social media

[Scouts Honor]

 

[Scouts Honor]

 

[Scouts Honor]

 

[Scouts Honor]

we aint got time to be talking about whites being killed

 

[Scouts Honor]

we will find the crime to justify his murder 

[Scouts Honor]

 

[Scouts Honor]

' you are lucky we are being merciful to you'

 

sounds like the other group we have been talking about 

[Offthemat]

Here to stay?

 

POSTED ON AUGUST 23, 2026 BY JOHN HINDERAKER IN GENDER FOLLIES, REPUBLICANS

  

LGB, NOT T

The Log Cabin Republicans, the GOP’s principal gay organization, has announced that it is severing ties with the “trans” movement:

The influential group – the nation’s largest GOP organization dedicated to representing lesbian, gay and bisexual conservatives and allies – voted to scrap the “T,” after more than a decade of support for transgender issues.

They did so over the trans rights movement’s “focus on minors,” the head of the Log Cabin Republicans explained. 

“At the time, we did not believe that we would find ourselves where we are today,” Ross Hemminger, president of the Log Cabin Republicans, wrote in an op-ed for Townhall, announcing the mission shift. 

“The transgender movement has ceased focusing on adults at all — nearly all of their efforts and those of their aligned special interest groups focus on minors,” Hemminger said of what’s taken place since the 2015 decision to champion transgender issues. “They push schools to teach radical gender ideology; they want biological men in women’s sports regardless of the consequences; perhaps most offensively, they support gender reassignment treatments for minors, often without the knowledge or consent of the parents, knowing full well these treatments are mostly irreversible.”

There has been quite a bit of friction between gay advocates and “trans” activists, with the goals of those movements being fundamentally in conflict. Nevertheless, with the world’s establishment firmly behind the “trans” cause, it required some courage for the Log Cabin Republicans to make their position explicit. Good for them.

 

https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2026/08/lgb-not-t.php

[Scouts Honor]

 

[Scouts Honor]