Should We Invade Greenland?

[Caveira]

11 hours ago, red viking said:

 

[Offthemat]

NATO leader warns Europe is unable to defend itself without US assistance

Rutte, who spoke with Trump at the World Economic Forum last week, told European lawmakers in Brussels that they would need to double their expected economic spending on defense if they hoped to defend themselves without the U.S.

 

https://justthenews.com/world/europe/nato-leader-warns-europe-unable-defend-itself-without-us-assistance

[mspart]

Double?   Ha.   It would have to be more than that.

I think we can answer the question by saying, NO, we should not invade Greenland.  

mspart

[Offthemat]

8 minutes ago, mspart said:

I think we can answer the question by saying, NO, we should not invade Greenland.  

I think the only way it was ever inferred that we would is if China or Russia had taken it over. 

[red viking]

17 minutes ago, Offthemat said:

I think the only way it was ever inferred that we would is if China or Russia had taken it over. 

Thats a complete lie. 

[WrestlingRasta]

On 1/24/2026 at 9:21 AM, Caveira said:

 

92% of his 2024 voters.  Please tell me you do realize that 92% is not “bigger” (as quoted in your copy/paste) than 100%, and that 70% is not “bigger” than 100%. You do realize that “of his voters” does not refer to the entire voting public, but rather only his voters, and that means there is a significant number that don’t approve, which in no way confirms he would win “bigger”? 

 Or are you of that school of thought that believes in the 600% reduction of cost? 
 

Alec Lace wrote this post specifically for the Caveira’s of the world

[Caveira]

9 minutes ago, WrestlingRasta said:

92% of his 2024 voters.  Please tell me you do realize that 92% is not “bigger” (as quoted in your copy/paste) than 100%, and that 70% is not “bigger” than 100%. You do realize that “of his voters” does not refer to the entire voting public, but rather only his voters, and that means there is a significant number that don’t approve, which in no way confirms he would win “bigger”? 

 Or are you of that school of thought that believes in the 600% reduction of cost? 
 

Alec Lace wrote this post specifically for the Caveira’s of the world

He got more votes than team blue.  Almost all of his voters like what he is doing.   
 

Don’t be mad that team blue couldn’t beat literal Hitler that was going to literally end democracy, become a dictator, and end your right to vote.   Pretty hard to lose to that.  

[WrestlingRasta]

2 minutes ago, Caveira said:

He got more votes than team blue.  Almost all of his voters like what he is doing.   

That’s not what you posted, and I’m not mad.  I’m not even “team blue”. 
 

But, carry on with your next copy and paste.  

[Offthemat]

20 minutes ago, WrestlingRasta said:

92% of his 2024 voters.  Please tell me you do realize that 92% is not “bigger” (as quoted in your copy/paste) than 100%, and that 70% is not “bigger” than 100%. You do realize that “of his voters” does not refer to the entire voting public, but rather only his voters, and that means there is a significant number that don’t approve, which in no way confirms he would win “bigger”? 

 Or are you of that school of thought that believes in the 600% reduction of cost? 
 

Alec Lace wrote this post specifically for the Caveira’s of the world

You’re showing that you don’t know how to read polls and are unaware of the popular sentiment. 

[WrestlingRasta]

1 minute ago, Offthemat said:

You’re showing that you don’t know how to read polls and are unaware of the popular sentiment. 

[mspart]

I think this is a contradiction of all the polls that are showing Trump massively underwater.   Either they are not asking the right people, or the poll that says 92% still like him is dead wrong.   Maybe they asked the same guy 1000 times!!

That's the way I see it. 

mspart

[Offthemat]

16 minutes ago, mspart said:

mspart

This is a poll only of people who voted for Trump.  You have to take into account that some will say that they are dissatisfied with his performance because he hasn’t done enough of the things they like, but they would in no way change their vote if given the chance. 

[Caveira]