Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Jimmy Cinnabon changed the title to Iowa athletes' lawsuit re: sports gambling surveillance fails
Posted

You're losing your touch, Jimmy. Let me help:

  • Will Iowa beat PSU this year because they're big mad over the gambling lawsuit?
  • Nelson Brands should appeal to the Supreme Court and get another season of eligibility
  • PSU can't get past Iowa's defense because they don't have qualified immunity
Posted

I didn’t really like the judge’s explanation.  DOJ trampled all over your rights but since there is no specific law on using that technology yet too bad.  At least that’s what I got out of it.

Posted
30 minutes ago, Wrestej said:

I didn’t really like the judge’s explanation.  DOJ trampled all over your rights but since there is no specific law on using that technology yet too bad.  At least that’s what I got out of it.

Maybe Trump will appeal to the Supreme Court!

Posted
39 minutes ago, Wrestej said:

I didn’t really like the judge’s explanation.  DOJ trampled all over your rights but since there is no specific law on using that technology yet too bad.  At least that’s what I got out of it.

🔥

Posted
1 hour ago, bnwtwg said:

Wrestlestat has already updated his profile for another year of Draftkings Shirt

ESsMTRm.jpeg

 

I'd  give you a reaction but Bob says no ... that scoundrel.  🤨

So there's this:  🚬 

.

Posted
1 hour ago, ionel said:

I'd  give you a reaction but Bob says no ... that scoundrel.  🤨

So there's this:  🚬 

i needed Reaction time before I could reply

spacer.png

i am an idiot on the internet

Posted
1 hour ago, WrestlingRash said:

Is the Orange Man in the room with us right now?

Must not be, I don't smell a shitty diaper or orange bronzer. 

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, WrestlingRash said:

Is the Orange Man in the room with us right now?

I hear he 110% owns rv.  

Edited by ionel

.

Posted
7 hours ago, Wrestej said:

I didn’t really like the judge’s explanation.  DOJ trampled all over your rights but since there is no specific law on using that technology yet too bad.  At least that’s what I got out of it.

That how "qualified immunity" works.    Look it up.    I don't like the concept but the Judge is bound by precedent.  

Posted (edited)
9 hours ago, Wrestej said:

I didn’t really like the judge’s explanation.  DOJ trampled all over your rights but since there is no specific law on using that technology yet too bad.  At least that’s what I got out of it.

if i wanted to really really go on a rant that doesn't fit on a wrestling forum i'd explain why qualified immunity is the worst thing the supreme court ever invented. it's why cops get to shoot first and ask questions later. iowa athletes getting jammed up for gambling is not close to the worst thing that happens because of QI. (not invented by the current court and there's a *little* momentum towards reining it in from some lower courts, but not a lot.)

Edited by ugarles
Posted
14 hours ago, ugarles said:

if i wanted to really really go on a rant that doesn't fit on a wrestling forum i'd explain why qualified immunity is the worst thing the supreme court ever invented. it's why cops get to shoot first and ask questions later. iowa athletes getting jammed up for gambling is not close to the worst thing that happens because of QI. (not invented by the current court and there's a *little* momentum towards reining it in from some lower courts, but not a lot.)

John Oliver did a segment on police chases and their use of QI as a defense against litigation and other recourse. Slightly ironic for Nelson to rail against it in this one instance where it didn't suit his needs.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...