Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 hours ago, WrestlingRasta said:

Conservatives are supposed to understand, and be in favor of, principles such as small  government, sovereignty, separation of powers, etc. 

And at least with overturning Roe v Wade, that was Trump's argument. 

“What I did is something — for 52 years they’ve been trying to get Roe v. Wade into the states."

  • Brain 1

Drowning in data, but thirsting for knowledge

Posted
1 hour ago, WrestlingRasta said:

Nuff said.   Data and facts are data and facts….talking heads are talking heads.  
 

We can agree to disagree I guess on which of these deals in facts.  

What do you mean "agree to disagree"....what data and facts show you that DC was/is a safe place and that the mayor and the police chief are clearly doing their job??

Posted
1 hour ago, WrestlingRasta said:

The full answer to this question would be more like and essay, to try to answer in short I would say: the constitution is a good study, and understanding the ‘how’ to this would require an understanding that in a government set up such as ours, that erosion is not and overnight event, but rather a process with steps.  I am not saying that IS what is happening here, but I am saying it’s a slippery slope.  And there is a point in that slope that once crossed, going back is very very difficult. 

Don't disagree with what you said here when applied as an overall concept...but again, can you articulate "how" the connection back to DC and the NG being there to an erosion of liberties since you are the one who attempted to make such a connection.

Posted
13 minutes ago, Bigbrog said:

Don't disagree with what you said here when applied as an overall concept...but again, can you articulate "how" the connection back to DC and the NG being there to an erosion of liberties since you are the one who attempted to make such a connection.

The answer is in the post you quoted, and said you don’t disagree.  Not sure what more you want from me.  If you are struggling with this concept, you may want to refer back to the portion of the post you quoted that says “I’m not saying this IS what is happening here, but I am saying it is a slippery slope” 

Posted (edited)

Well, first I never said “DC is a safe place”, unless you can point to something I’m missing. I linked to The data, that shows that for the last two years crime is trending down, even after the presidents major cuts to funding to combat crime, and at the time the President decided to put military in the streets of American cities. 
 

The disagree to disagree is that I say the data and facts speak for themselves, where as you say no because “people believe”

I hope that clears it up for you. 

Edited by WrestlingRasta
Posted
3 minutes ago, WrestlingRasta said:

The answer is in the post you quoted, and said you don’t disagree.  Not sure what more you want from me.  If you are struggling with this concept, you may want to refer back to the portion of the post you quoted that says “I’m not saying this IS what is happening here, but I am saying it is a slippery slope” 

Yep...I don't disagree...with the concept overall...and yep, I apologize for missing the part where you agreed you shouldn't have tried to make the connection about losing liberties to what has/is happening in DC.

How about all those data and facts that made you conclude that DC is and has been a safe city??

Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, Bigbrog said:

the part where you agreed you shouldn't have tried to make the connection about losing liberties to what has/is happening in DC.

Where did I agree to this specifically?  I’m getting the feeling you’re reading things I did not write  

 

4 minutes ago, Bigbrog said:

How about all those data and facts that made you conclude that DC is and has been a safe city??

Patience young sky walker, I do have to tend to some things as well.  I replied to this.  And, ironically, it relates to you apparently reading things I didn’t write.  

Edited by WrestlingRasta
  • Bob 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, WrestlingRasta said:

, even after the presidents major cuts to funding to combat crime

That same data shows since 2012 ish they are 2-3x higher murder rates

Posted
1 minute ago, WrestlingRasta said:

Well, first I never said “DC is a safe place”, unless you can point to something missing I linked to The data, that shows that for the last two years crime is trending down, even after the presidents major cuts to funding to combat crime, and at the time the President decided to put military in the streets of American cities. 
 

The disagree to disagree is that I say the data and facts speak for themselves, whereas you say no because “people believe”

I hope that clears it up for you. 

LOL...what do the data and facts say to you when they speak for themselves?  Where did I say that I based my opinion on only what "people believe"??  I'll stand by my stance that DC wasn't a safe place....what is your stance again?

Posted
1 minute ago, WrestlingRasta said:

Where did I agree to this specifically?  I’m getting the feeling you’re reading things I did not write.  

 

Patience young sky walker, I do have to tend to some things as well.  I replied to this.  And, ironically, it relates to you apparently reading things I didn’t write.  

I was merely asking what your stance is given that you wrote about believing in facts and talked about losing liberties...I don't believe asking for clarification is reading into things you wrote as I truly was trying not to do that by asking questions.

And yeah...my bad as you responded right before I hit send...again, I was/am just asking questions.

Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, Bigbrog said:

LOL...what do the data and facts say to you when they speak for themselves?  Where did I say that I based my opinion on only what "people believe"??  I'll stand by my stance that DC wasn't a safe place....what is your stance again?

I didn’t for see you having these issues with being able to read what I have actually said, and decipher from what I have not said.  My “stance” is in the first paragraph you just quoted.  

Edited by WrestlingRasta
  • Bob 1
Posted
1 minute ago, mspart said:

Bowser now says DC is safer with the Trump rush.   

 

mspart

Man.  I thought they would strip all freedom and liberty from the residents.   Crazy turn of events.  

Posted
25 minutes ago, headshuck said:


I guess his case didn’t pass mustard.

... lettuce relish in that humor 

  • Haha 1

.

Posted
8 minutes ago, Stockton said:

I guess this Grand Jury couldn't indict this "Ham Sandwich" thrower

How many weird burner accounts are out there?

Posted
13 minutes ago, headshuck said:

These puns are the cream of the crop, let's keep dishing them out!

You are really trying to ham it up there. 

.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...