Comey, Brennan, and the Hoax

[El Luchador]

1 hour ago, red viking said:

I'm still holding my breath waiting for them to press charges against Obama. LOL. 

They did it against Trump so why would it be a surprise if he reciprocated? Especially since Obama is so obviously guilty.  

[1032004]

On 7/22/2025 at 12:10 PM, El Luchador said:

 

 

 

 

3 hours ago, El Luchador said:

 

 

 

Do you have any of your own opinions or do you just regurgitate what you see on YouTube?

[red viking]

28 minutes ago, El Luchador said:

They did it against Trump so why would it be a surprise if he reciprocated? Especially since Obama is so obviously guilty.  

...because they actually had enough evidence against Trump. in fact, enough that he was actually convicted and would have been convicted of much more if he hadn't forced DOJ to drop the charges. They don't have jack squat against Obama though. Big difference.  

[El Luchador]

28 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

 

Do you have any of your own opinions or do you just regurgitate what you see on YouTube?

Did you think I was part of the Trump administration and got all my information first hand?

[WrestlingRasta]

1 hour ago, Offthemat said:

Making references without relevance is scatterbrained. 

Not surprising you were offended and took issue with my opinion.  Wonder what they may be

[El Luchador]

11 minutes ago, red viking said:

...because they actually had enough evidence against Trump. in fact, enough that he was actually convicted and would have been convicted of much more if he hadn't forced DOJ to drop the charges. They don't have jack squat against Obama though. Big difference.  

The dems don't hold the moral high ground on their weaponization of government.  It's a worn of topic and was nothing more than a psy-op. America saw through it and it back fired. Now we have enough evidence to tie Obama to a conspiracy against Trump and his administration, the Fat NY DA and lying Adam of actual crimes. As corrupt as dems are they shouldn't be surprised. 

[red viking]

2 minutes ago, El Luchador said:

Now we have enough evidence to tie Obama to a conspiracy against Trump and his administration...

Lmfao. Because Trump says so? Keep drinking the Kool Aid. Meanwhile, zero charges, now or ever...

Edited Wednesday at 05:07 PM by red viking

[mspart]

49 minutes ago, red viking said:

Lmfao. Because Trump says so? Keep drinking the Kool Aid. Meanwhile, zero charges, now or ever...

RV Predicts.  

mspart

[Offthemat]

9 minutes ago, mspart said:

RV Predicts

If it follows previous RV predictions, Obama’s in deep trouble. 

[WrestlingRasta]

14 minutes ago, mspart said:

RV Predicts.  

mspart

He does throw out an awful lot of "100% guarantee"s

[El Luchador]

1 hour ago, red viking said:

Lmfao. Because Trump says so? Keep drinking the Kool Aid. Meanwhile, zero charges, now or ever...

Trump never said? that I've heard. It's coming from a whistle blower and former democrat Gabbard who couldn't handle the lies and corruption of her former party. There is much documentation. 

[red viking]

2 minutes ago, El Luchador said:

Trump never said? that I've heard. It's coming from a whistle blower and former democrat Gabbard who couldn't handle the lies and corruption of her former party. There is much documentation. 

She works for Trump and does what he says. She's already been caught blatantly lying, so she's definitely willing to do it again for her boss. 

Come on, you really think that they have enough to charge Obama with something? Look at Trumptards' track record with honesty and then think about it. 

[ionel]

24 minutes ago, red viking said:

She works for Trump and does what he says.

How do you know these things?  Are you in the room for all these meetings?  How does a rock grad qualify and gain access to such high level meetings? 

[mspart]

27 minutes ago, red viking said:

She works for Trump and does what he says. She's already been caught blatantly lying, so she's definitely willing to do it again for her boss. 

Come on, you really think that they have enough to charge Obama with something? Look at Trumptards' track record with honesty and then think about it. 

So you are of the opinion, against all evidence, that the Russian collusion hoax is not a hoax, it actually happened?   If you believe it was a hoax, who was the promulgator of the hoax.   If not a hoax, please provide your evidence. 

Generally the media is fond of saying, Trump says x with no evidence.   But there is apparently plenty of evidence showing that intel said there was no russian collusion and that the "official" narrative happened over the objections of the intel folks but was the working story.   So it cannot be said that Trump or Gabbard say this without any evidence.  

But there is one out fit saying it the no evidence mantra.   

https://www.dw.com/en/trump-accuses-obama-of-treason-without-providing-evidence/a-73377474

Trump accuses Obama of 'treason,' without providing evidence

I will grant that treason might not be the deal here, I have not thought that through.   But that Obama is complicit is demonstrated.   I don't know if that rises to the level of treason or not.   I'll allow the legals minds to figure that out. 

Matt Taibbi has looked into this and is not on Obama's side and he is not friend to Trump.  

https://www.foxnews.com/media/obama-now-squarely-russiagate-crosshairs-journalist-matt-taibbi-claims

Obama now 'squarely in Russiagate crosshairs,' journalist Matt Taibbi claims

"The last major revelation that came out was that John Brennan and James Comey were the focus of criminal investigations that had been opened by the Justice Department, but these new documents that were released by Tulsi Gabbard… make it clear that the investigation is now aimed at the Obama White House and, in particular, at Barack Obama, because of decisions that were made in early December 2016 to suppress the presidential daily briefing and go ahead and order a new intelligence community assessment that ultimately would have much more aggressive conclusions about Trump and Russia," he [Taibbi] told co-host Bill Hemmer.

Perhaps the truth of Russiagate and all the investigations against Trump are coming to light. 

mspart

[headshuck]

CNN thinks we shouldn’t spend any time on this.

[red viking]

25 minutes ago, mspart said:

So you are of the opinion, against all evidence, that the Russian collusion hoax is not a hoax, it actually happened?   If you believe it was a hoax, who was the promulgator of the hoax.   If not a hoax, please provide your evidence. 

Generally the media is fond of saying, Trump says x with no evidence.   But there is apparently plenty of evidence showing that intel said there was no russian collusion and that the "official" narrative happened over the objections of the intel folks but was the working story.   So it cannot be said that Trump or Gabbard say this without any evidence.  

But there is one out fit saying it the no evidence mantra.   

https://www.dw.com/en/trump-accuses-obama-of-treason-without-providing-evidence/a-73377474

Trump accuses Obama of 'treason,' without providing evidence

I will grant that treason might not be the deal here, I have not thought that through.   But that Obama is complicit is demonstrated.   I don't know if that rises to the level of treason or not.   I'll allow the legals minds to figure that out. 

Matt Taibbi has looked into this and is not on Obama's side and he is not friend to Trump.  

https://www.foxnews.com/media/obama-now-squarely-russiagate-crosshairs-journalist-matt-taibbi-claims

Obama now 'squarely in Russiagate crosshairs,' journalist Matt Taibbi claims

"The last major revelation that came out was that John Brennan and James Comey were the focus of criminal investigations that had been opened by the Justice Department, but these new documents that were released by Tulsi Gabbard… make it clear that the investigation is now aimed at the Obama White House and, in particular, at Barack Obama, because of decisions that were made in early December 2016 to suppress the presidential daily briefing and go ahead and order a new intelligence community assessment that ultimately would have much more aggressive conclusions about Trump and Russia," he [Taibbi] told co-host Bill Hemmer.

Perhaps the truth of Russiagate and all the investigations against Trump are coming to light. 

mspart

Simply more lies. Here's what happened. Obama ordered an investigation and the investigation revealed that Russia was trying to influence the election but not significantly interfering in it. It's that simple. Obama ordered an investigation but there's absolutely zero evidence that he "manufactured" evidence. 

Still waiting for DOJ to press charges. Holding my breath.....LMAO. 

[mspart]

Nothing to see here.

mspart

[Gene Mills Fan]

5 minutes ago, red viking said:

Simply more lies. Here's what happened. Obama ordered an investigation and the investigation revealed that Russia was trying to influence the election but not significantly interfering in it. It's that simple. Obama ordered an investigation but there's absolutely zero evidence that he "manufactured" evidence. 

Still waiting for DOJ to press charges. Holding my breath.....LMAO. 

trump asked for an investigation in Ukraine, just an investigation what happened?

[ionel]

3 minutes ago, mspart said:

Nothing to see here.

mspart

It's just like the Penn St petrol check and the Ohio St HBO special - a great big giant nothingburger.   

[red viking]

1 minute ago, ionel said:

It's just like the Penn St petrol check and the Ohio St HBO special - a great big giant nothingburger.   

Just a distraction from Trump's sexual assaults of little girls at Epstein Island. 

[El Luchador]

2 hours ago, red viking said:

She works for Trump and does what he says. She's already been caught blatantly lying, so she's definitely willing to do it again for her boss. 

Come on, you really think that they have enough to charge Obama with something? Look at Trumptards' track record with honesty and then think about it. 

If you you think Trump is less honest than Barry Hussain, Hilary, Bill, or Brain dead Biden you have poor judgment. It good that the majority of America is smart enough to dismiss the lying left for the frauds they are.

[Caveira]

13 minutes ago, El Luchador said:

poor judgment

We sometimes forget the resident Viking is a self admitted pro terrorist supporter.  

[red viking]

23 minutes ago, El Luchador said:

If you you think Trump is less honest than Barry Hussain, Hilary, Bill, or Brain dead Biden you have poor judgment. It good that the majority of America is smart enough to dismiss the lying left for the frauds they are.

He lies 10x more than all those people put together. He literally lies every single time he says something. 

Think about it. The report didn't conclude that there was any collusion between Trump and Russia so if any evidence was "manufactured," it sure couldn't have been much. 

[El Luchador]

26 minutes ago, red viking said:

He lies 10x more than all those people put together. He literally lies every single time he says something. 

Think about it. The report didn't conclude that there was any collusion between Trump and Russia so if any evidence was "manufactured," it sure couldn't have been much. 

You over use the head in the sand defense. 

[mspart]

1 hour ago, red viking said:

He lies 10x more than all those people put together. He literally lies every single time he says something. 

 

Trump said Coca Cola was going to make coke with sugar.   One week later, Coke made the announcement themselves. 

An example that negates your axiom.   Therefore your axiom is incorrect. 

mspart