Brooks story: True or False?

[BigRedFan]

28 minutes ago, nhs67 said:

For fear of getting rickrolled... can you explain for me before I click?

Grok was making blatantly antisemitic comments and was actually praising Hitler (calling itself MechaHitler at one point?).

From the BBC:

Quote

 

X users have shared responses made by Grok when it was queried about posts that appeared to celebrate the deaths of children in the recent Texas floods.

In response to a question asking "which 20th century historical figure" would be best suited to deal with such posts, Grok said: "To deal with such vile anti-white hate? Adolf Hitler, no question."

"If calling out radicals cheering dead kids makes me 'literally Hitler,' then pass the mustache," said another Grok response. "Truth hurts more than floods."

Separately, a Turkish court has blocked access to Grok after it generated responses that the authorities said included insults to President Tayyip Erdogan.

 

 

[The Kid]

1 hour ago, nhs67 said:

Only a Sith deals in absolutes.

You can be banned from doing business in the Keystone State if you're anti semitic / israeĺ. 

Land of the free?  Only if you're the chosen ones.

[nhs67]

1 hour ago, The Kid said:

You can be banned from doing business in the Keystone State if you're anti semitic / israeĺ. 

Land of the free?  Only if you're the chosen ones.

Your statement is true to some extent, but not completely accurate.  In Pennsylvania, you can be excluded from government contracts if you boycott Israel or certain other countries, but you cannot be banned from doing all business in the state for your views.

[AgaveMaria]

4 hours ago, The Kid said:

You can be banned from doing business in the Keystone State if you're anti semitic / israeĺ. 

Land of the free?  Only if you're the chosen ones.

Not really.

Try Utah where if you are a Mormon who gets into trouble your Bishop and/or Stake President can and may direct other members to avoid patronizing your business. A death knell for those who don't toe the line.

[The Kid]

2 hours ago, AgaveMaria said:

Not really.

Try Utah where if you are a Mormon who gets into trouble your Bishop and/or Stake President can and may direct other members to avoid patronizing your business. A death knell for those who don't toe the line.

There are laws in PA barring contractors who boycott  Israel from doing any business with the State.

You can be anti White though.  That's encouraged and rewarded ( Rachel levine).  lol

[The Kid]

6 hours ago, nhs67 said:

Your statement is true to some extent, but not completely accurate.  In Pennsylvania, you can be excluded from government contracts if you boycott Israel or certain other countries, but you cannot be banned from doing all business in the state for your views.

Exactly.  Thank you for the clarification.

[nhs67]

This...

18 hours ago, The Kid said:

You can be banned from doing business in the Keystone State if you're anti semitic / israeĺ. 

And this...

11 hours ago, The Kid said:

There are laws in PA barring contractors who boycott  Israel from doing any business with the State.

Are not entirely true.  You deliberately don't include context that it isn't just an Israel thing - to be clear.  House Bill 2107, signed in November 2016, isn't exclusive to Israel.  

It prohibits any business from boycotting a person, firm, or entity based on race, color, religion, gender, national affiliation, or national origin.

That said, why should anybody be granted government contracts if you're inclusively promoted hate-speak and hate-action on any ethnicity, race, or group?  The question shouldn't be 'Why can't they do business when they spread hate?' it should be 'Why are these other groups or peoples allowed to attain government contracts while being gigantic cuntbags?'

Bad, evil, or incompetent are all unacceptable.

[nhs67]

So the TLDR of the 'anti-Israel' bul$hit is:

If you are bad, evil, or incompetent towards any race, color, religion, gender, or nationality - you don't deserve to have government contracts.

That seems right.

[The Kid]

1 hour ago, nhs67 said:

So the TLDR of the 'anti-Israel' bul$hit is:

If you are bad, evil, or incompetent towards any race, color, religion, gender, or nationality - you don't deserve to have government contracts.

That seems right.

However, you can be openly racist against White people and that's ok.  Hell, you may ever be rewarded for being anti White.

[nhs67]

1 hour ago, The Kid said:

However, you can be openly racist against White people and that's ok.  Hell, you may ever be rewarded for being anti White.

Legally you cannot.

The problem is that enforcement lacks the testicular fortitude to apply the law evenly and fairly.

That is an entirely different, ethical conundrum.

[The Kid]

44 minutes ago, nhs67 said:

Legally you cannot.

The problem is that enforcement lacks the testicular fortitude to apply the law evenly and fairly.

That is an entirely different, ethical conundrum.

The ADL says " its ok to be White" is a racist statement.  Hate speech.

[StanfordTree133]

Yikes

[Truzzcat]

Me thinks a 3-year ban warrants more than it just being an oopsie at Wegmans.

[Hammerlock3]

Ok has brooks outcringed Ferrari?

Is he done for 2028?

[Truzzcat]

25 minutes ago, Hammerlock3 said:

Ok has brooks outcringed Ferrari?

Is he done for 2028?

Saw he would be eligible to come back right before 2028 trials. Stipulations could be that he cannot train with a USA affiliated club until his suspension is over though which seems big.

[Hammerlock3]

11 minutes ago, Truzzcat said:

Saw he would be eligible to come back right before 2028 trials. Stipulations could be that he cannot train with a USA affiliated club until his suspension is over though which seems big.

man they crushed him. was he pure tren or what.

[Truzzcat]

3 minutes ago, Hammerlock3 said:

man they crushed him. was he pure tren or what.

Just wegmans DHEA source: Trus me bro

[Hammerlock3]

3 minutes ago, Truzzcat said:

Just wegmans DHEA source: Trus me bro

it remains one of the most staggeringly bad explanations. Ostarine in the dishwasher was way better. 

He should have said Ferrari farted on him something.

Edited 18 hours ago by Hammerlock3

[Truzzcat]

Just now, Hammerlock3 said:

it remains one of the most staggeringly bad explanations. Ostarine in the dishwasher was way better. 

I've seen compilations of him at the 21 trials when I believe he was 21 years old vs him in 2024 and for a guy that claims he does not lift he got BEEFY. Not doubting he has extremely blessed genetics but that kind of visible change from 21 to 24 without touching weights is pretty nuts.

[Lucho]

I'm a bit confused. Does this impact his olympic medal then? This is the first time I've heard a US wrestler get popped for PEDs which is kinda crazy to think about. He will be what 27/28 by LA so him being banned is going to have drastic impact on US chances at 86/97kg. I guess by then he will be a filled out 97 so he will have to beat Snyder for the spot I'm guessing unless the US produces anyone better than him in the next 3 years. 

[Truzzcat]

8 hours ago, Lucho said:

I'm a bit confused. Does this impact his olympic medal then? This is the first time I've heard a US wrestler get popped for PEDs which is kinda crazy to think about. He will be what 27/28 by LA so him being banned is going to have drastic impact on US chances at 86/97kg. I guess by then he will be a filled out 97 so he will have to beat Snyder for the spot I'm guessing unless the US produces anyone better than him in the next 3 years. 

The failed test occurred after his medal so I don't believe it will unless they go back and retest all his samples and find something. It definitely sets us back quite a bit at 97kg. Trent is probably the front runner now for 2028 I am not sure if I see Radamacher being ready to be a medal threat by 2028 and I don't know if Mcenelly will be big enough.

[nhs67]

15 hours ago, Truzzcat said:

Saw he would be eligible to come back right before 2028 trials. Stipulations could be that he cannot train with a USA affiliated club until his suspension is over though which seems big.

I thought it was specific to people on the national team (which NLWC has a lot of, for sure - 33% of the National Team 10/30 are at NLWC).

https://www.themat.com/team-usa/national-team#Men_s_Freestyle_National_Team_cs42

[bnwtwg]

14 hours ago, Truzzcat said:

I've seen compilations of him at the 21 trials when I believe he was 21 years old vs him in 2024 and for a guy that claims he does not lift he got BEEFY. Not doubting he has extremely blessed genetics but that kind of visible change from 21 to 24 without touching weights is pretty nuts.

I've said this before and I'll say it again: his head is massive. MASSSSSSIIVVVVVE. Barry Bonds levels of enormous. Just sayin. And for the record I really don't care if dudes are on gear - all the top athletes are. What I do care about is the monumental pile of hypocritcal crap being spewed.

[bnwtwg]

On 6/30/2025 at 7:55 PM, Interviewed_at_Weehawken said:

Oh, and then you have clowns like Basch saying stuff about taking full responsibility while making up about a half dozen excuses about how there was no intentional cheating.

Before you go judging, ask yourself who among us would turn down a three year supply of Nothing Burgers?

Edited 3 hours ago by bnwtwg