Trump Admin Arrests Judge

[Husker_Du]

RV officially lost his mind. 

[mspart]

So you can read the whole Bondi statement :

Wild! Attorney General Pam Bondi explains what really happened with Milwaukee Judge Hannah Dugan that led to her arrest by FBI: "The Judge learns that ICE was outside to get the guy, because he had been deported in 2013, came back into our country, charged with committing these crimes, victim is in court. Judge finds out. She goes out into the hallway. Screams at the immigration officer. She's furious. Visibly shaken. Upset. Sends them off to talk to the chief judge. "She comes back into the courtroom. You're not going to believe this. Takes the defendant and the defense attorney back in her chambers. Takes them out a private exit and tells them to leave. While the state prosecutor and victims of domestic violence are sitting in the courtroom."

Based on her reported behavior, it does not sound good for the WI judge. If convicted, she should lose her bar credentials, law license, and judgeship.   She might be absent for awhile.

mspart

[mspart]

7 hours ago, red viking said:

Because she disagreed, basically. The blatant attempt to become a dictator is getting increasingly disturbing. Wow. A true constitutional crisis.

The original post breakdown:

Because she disagreed, basically.    Thesis is that she was arrested because she disagreed with federal law.  She very well could have disagreed with established federal immigration law.   Does that give her a right to break that law, circumvent that law?  If so, she is above the law, and you continually says that no one is above the law. 

The blatant attempt to become a dictator is getting increasingly disturbing.   How does a person attempt or try to become a dictator?    That is a crazy idea.   They either do or they don't.   You are not a dictator  by enforcing established immigration law that has been on the books for like forever?   Just because the law was not enforced in the previous admin, does not  mean that the current one cannot enforce it.   Homan has been saying this will happen if people obstruct justice.   Looks like  he was right.

A true constitutional crisis.    Are you kidding me?   Enforcement of the law is the basis for a constitutional crisis?   It was the non enforcement of the law that was the crisis.   Your opinion here , like in other threads, is not based on any fact or law.   I do not wish your version of government on anyone.  

mspart

[Scouts Honor]

3 hours ago, red viking said:

Well established history with this admin taking action based upon lies

lol says the gaslighter

[Scouts Honor]

1 hour ago, mspart said:

The original post breakdown:

Because she disagreed, basically.    Thesis is that she was arrested because she disagreed with federal law.  She very well could have disagreed with established federal immigration law.   Does that give her a right to break that law, circumvent that law?  If so, she is above the law, and you continually says that no one is above the law. 

The blatant attempt to become a dictator is getting increasingly disturbing.   How does a person attempt or try to become a dictator?    That is a crazy idea.   They either do or they don't.   You are not a dictator  by enforcing established immigration law that has been on the books for like forever?   Just because the law was not enforced in the previous admin, does not  mean that the current one cannot enforce it.   Homan has been saying this will happen if people obstruct justice.   Looks like  he was right.

A true constitutional crisis.    Are you kidding me?   Enforcement of the law is the basis for a constitutional crisis?   It was the non enforcement of the law that was the crisis.   Your opinion here , like in other threads, is not based on any fact or law.   I do not wish your version of government on anyone.  

mspart

Well established history with this poster making claims based upon lies

and continual gaslighting

[red viking]

2 hours ago, Scouts Honor said:

Well established history with this poster making claims based upon lies

and continual gaslighting

So far, there's zero evidence that she received an order to turn over the person or order for him to be detained. Wingers never learn. Trump and his admin constantly take action w o proper facts and this is no different. 

Sham arrest and shell be acquitted. Trump is just trying to send a message. Wingers will say she was acquitted by "activist judges." Keep drinking the red Kool aid.

Edited 14 hours ago by red viking

[Scouts Honor]

 

[Scouts Honor]

20 minutes ago, red viking said:

So far, there's zero evidence that she received an order to turn over the person or order for him to be detained. Wingers never learn. Trump and his admin constantly take action w o proper facts and this is no different. 

Sham arrest and shell be acquitted. Trump is just trying to send a message. Wingers will say she was acquitted by "activist judges." Keep drinking the red Kool aid.

who's in the closet, gaslighter

[red viking]

8 hours ago, Scouts Honor said:

who's in the closet, gaslighter

If she didn't get or see an order from ICE, she didn't do anything illegal. I guarantee that charges won't stick. Another waste of $ just to send a message and get retribution. 

[JimmySpeaks]

“We need due process!!!!!,  unless of course it’s a woke winger activist judge 

[Ohio Elite]

 

[PortaJohn]

11 hours ago, red viking said:

So far, there's zero evidence that she received an order to turn over the person or order for him to be detained. Wingers never learn. Trump and his admin constantly take action w o proper facts and this is no different. 

Sham arrest and shell be acquitted. Trump is just trying to send a message. Wingers will say she was acquitted by "activist judges." Keep drinking the red Kool aid.

Curious to learn more facts as this unfolds but where are you getting your information stating that an order to the Judge is required for Ice to detain the suspect?  From my understanding ICE has free range to execute their arrest.  She is in trouble for instructing Flores-Ruiz to leave through a Jury Door after she stopped them from exiting through the common doors.  

At this time this has been corroborated by several witnesses in the courtroom.    

[red viking]

2 hours ago, PortaJohn said:

Curious to learn more facts as this unfolds but where are you getting your information stating that an order to the Judge is required for Ice to detain the suspect?  From my understanding ICE has free range to execute their arrest.  She is in trouble for instructing Flores-Ruiz to leave through a Jury Door after she stopped them from exiting through the common doors.  

At this time this has been corroborated by several witnesses in the courtroom.    

She can't get convicted of obstruction based upon her "hearing" that ICE wants to apprehend him. ICE needs to provide her an order or at least tell her directly that they have orders to apprehend. 

Otherwise, there's nothing legally for her to violate. 

Edited 4 minutes ago by red viking