Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
18 minutes ago, Jimmy Cinnabon said:

Penn State will get 2 champs tomorrow, so they'll win it.

But I can't help but feel disappointed with the quarter and semi performance.

Not to mention your boy davis going down!

"Half measures are a coward's form of insanity."

Posted
4 minutes ago, Wrestleknownothing said:

They both have three finalist. As does Iowa.

Yeah, but...if you're a PSU fan, this is probably the worst tournament under Cael...relative to expectations. 

They have such an uncanny knack for winning in the Semis...to watch Van Ness get just dominated in the first, Kasak to get beaten, Haines just had one chance after another as Hamiti shut it down(he really should have just scored and put it away). 

Give credit to Nebraska, Okie State, Iowa...I mean, I don't think anything has fundamentally changed given the talent PSU has that'll be there the next year or 3, especially if Ono is really going to Wrestle(is this confirmed by the way) but I think as much as PSU has been dominant, the top programs are just elevating. It's cool to see. 

  • Bob 1
  • Fire 1
Posted
1 minute ago, jajensen09 said:

I know this. Penn state is only favored in 2. 

You are easily confused. You got lost from the beginning of your sentence to the end. They both "have a shot at three???"

Drowning in data, but thirsting for knowledge

Posted
1 minute ago, scourge165 said:

Yeah, but...if you're a PSU fan, this is probably the worst tournament under Cael...relative to expectations. 

They have such an uncanny knack for winning in the Semis...to watch Van Ness get just dominated in the first, Kasak to get beaten, Haines just had one chance after another as Hamiti shut it down(he really should have just scored and put it away). 

Give credit to Nebraska, Okie State, Iowa...I mean, I don't think anything has fundamentally changed given the talent PSU has that'll be there the next year or 3, especially if Ono is really going to Wrestle(is this confirmed by the way) but I think as much as PSU has been dominant, the top programs are just elevating. It's cool to see. 

Nowhere have I not given credit to Nebraska, Oklahoma State, or Iowa. You are barking up the wrong tree.

Drowning in data, but thirsting for knowledge

Posted (edited)
9 minutes ago, scourge165 said:

Yeah, but...if you're a PSU fan, this is probably the worst tournament under Cael...relative to expectations. 

They have such an uncanny knack for winning in the Semis...to watch Van Ness get just dominated in the first, Kasak to get beaten, Haines just had one chance after another as Hamiti shut it down(he really should have just scored and put it away). 

Give credit to Nebraska, Okie State, Iowa...I mean, I don't think anything has fundamentally changed given the talent PSU has that'll be there the next year or 3, especially if Ono is really going to Wrestle(is this confirmed by the way) but I think as much as PSU has been dominant, the top programs are just elevating. It's cool to see. 

Do you mean as far as individual champions? I haven’t looked at all the matchups yet, but a push to 170 is very possible tomorrow. They have seven guys in the consi-semis and I would think a good number of favorable matchups. Kerk possibly being done hurts that, though. 

But I get it. The last time Iowa won while Penn State ruled Saturday night felt like a victory in a way. The dual elements of individual and team titles fluctuate in seemed importance and pedigree

Edited by MLB9
Posted
4 minutes ago, Wrestleknownothing said:

Nowhere have I not given credit to Nebraska, Oklahoma State, or Iowa. You are barking up the wrong tree.

Dude...it's an expression. 

"Give credit to..." doesn't mean YOU specifically are not giving those teams credit, it's just...simply MY way of saying...give those teams credit.

 

You ever watch a Super Bowl, World Series, whatever? The losing team, they say, "give credit to the Eagles, they battled all night, just came up short." Whatever. 

 

Man, people are sensitive(or at least on edge). Why would you think I'm "barking" at you at all?

  • Bob 1
Posted
1 minute ago, MLB9 said:

Do you mean as far as individual champions? I haven’t looked at all the matchups yet, but a push to 170 is very possible tomorrow. They have seven guys and I would think a good number of favorable matchups. Kerk possibly being done hurts that, though. 
But I get it. The last time Iowa won while Penn State ruled Saturday night felt like a victory in a way. The dual elements of individual and team titles fluctuate in seemed importance and pedigree

Yeah, I meant in terms of the big matches. I guess I haven't been paying attention to the backside. I thought I saw someone say Davis was out and I know Lillendahl beat Rivera...and I suppose it's a good bet SVN, Kasak, Haines, Bartlett all take 3rd. 


But yeah, it's just not the type of performance I expected. That's probably due to Penn State's overall performance. 

  • Bob 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, MLB9 said:

Do you mean as far as individual champions? I haven’t looked at all the matchups yet, but a push to 170 is very possible tomorrow. They have seven guys in the consi-semis and I would think a good number of favorable matchups. Kerk possibly being done hurts that, though. 

But I get it. The last time Iowa won while Penn State ruled Saturday night felt like a victory in a way. The dual elements of individual and team titles fluctuate in seemed importance and pedigree

It's performance relative to seed. As @Wrestleknownothing has pointed out many times, PSU has the best performance of any NCAA program relative to their seeds during Cael's tenure. This year, that is not the case. 125, 141, 157, 174, and 285 will place lower than they were seeded, 149, 165, and 184 can still perform to seed, only 133 and 197 have performed above their seed. This was a pretty large underperformance by Penn State using their own performance standards. However, when 9 of your 10 wrestlers are top 4 seeds, and the other is still an 8 seed, you can obviously underperform and still win a national title.

  • Bob 1
Posted
56 minutes ago, Wrestleknownothing said:

PSU is at 135.5

Nebraska can score 140.

PSU needs one champion and bonus points to lock it up.

Mesenbrink probably all by himself.   But shouldn't they clear 140 in the morning even if Kerk can't go? 

Posted

Davis is a favorite seed-wise to wrestle for 3rd, which is kinda crazy. Fugitt seems like a different dude lately though, so who knows. Kasak/Shapiro should be interesting, TK looks a little rough though. If they all average a 4th place finish that’s 24.5 more team points with no bonus. I’d guess they’ll finish in the mid 160’s.

If Barr hadn’t won, I’d feel different. I didn’t think he’d even make it through the tournament after his leg issue.

Posted
2 minutes ago, dragit said:

Mesenbrink probably all by himself.   But shouldn't they clear 140 in the morning even if Kerk can't go? 

I would think they’ll clear 140 within the first three or four matches. Lilledahl would seal it if he gets anything more than an MD against Ventresca. That’s very unlikely I know, but a possible outcome.

Posted
7 minutes ago, dragit said:

Mesenbrink probably all by himself.   But shouldn't they clear 140 in the morning even if Kerk can't go? 

They certainly can seal it earlier. Their max points are 213, and if they wrestle to seed they will get 171.5.

Drowning in data, but thirsting for knowledge

Posted
10 minutes ago, BruceyB said:

It's performance relative to seed. As @Wrestleknownothing has pointed out many times, PSU has the best performance of any NCAA program relative to their seeds during Cael's tenure. This year, that is not the case. 125, 141, 157, 174, and 285 will place lower than they were seeded, 149, 165, and 184 can still perform to seed, only 133 and 197 have performed above their seed. This was a pretty large underperformance by Penn State using their own performance standards. However, when 9 of your 10 wrestlers are top 4 seeds, and the other is still an 8 seed, you can obviously underperform and still win a national title.

Was the average seed 2.6? That is a high standard and hard to match. If they have no more losses, the average placement would be 2.4. Won’t happen, but they won’t be terribly far off.

Your post this week on regression to the mean this year was spot on, the semifinal success rate couldn’t continue at that clip forever.

  • Bob 1
Posted
12 minutes ago, BruceyB said:

It's performance relative to seed. As @Wrestleknownothing has pointed out many times, PSU has the best performance of any NCAA program relative to their seeds during Cael's tenure. This year, that is not the case. 125, 141, 157, 174, and 285 will place lower than they were seeded, 149, 165, and 184 can still perform to seed, only 133 and 197 have performed above their seed. This was a pretty large underperformance by Penn State using their own performance standards. However, when 9 of your 10 wrestlers are top 4 seeds, and the other is still an 8 seed, you can obviously underperform and still win a national title.

To be fair when six of your guys are seeded to be finalists that doesn’t leave much room for error. It’s a little different then not meeting your seed of 4, 5, or 6

Also, 285 can still meet his seed

Posted
2 minutes ago, Wrestleknownothing said:

They certainly can seal it earlier. Their max points are 213, and if they wrestle to seed they will get 171.5.

171.5 - what a total and catastrophic collaps.  We need to make amends to the other threads' OPs right quick. 

Posted
5 minutes ago, Packard said:

To be fair when six of your guys are seeded to be finalists that doesn’t leave much room for error. It’s a little different then not meeting your seed of 4, 5, or 6

Also, 285 can still meet his seed

I agree. The underperformance is only relative to the absurd standard that they themselves have created. It's an underperformance by their standards, not normal standards.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Rankings

  • College Commitments

    Co'ji Campbell

    St. Joseph Catholic Academy, Wisconsin
    Class of 2025
    Committed to Illinois
    Projected Weight: 125, 133

    Brady Collins

    Clearfield, Pennsylvania
    Class of 2025
    Committed to Lehigh
    Projected Weight: 165, 174

    Abe Hermes

    Milan Edison, Ohio
    Class of 2025
    Committed to Ohio
    Projected Weight: 141

    Jackson Albert

    Saucon Valley, Pennsylvania
    Class of 2025
    Committed to George Mason
    Projected Weight: 149, 157

    Ryan Hayes

    Methacton, Pennsylvania
    Class of 2025
    Committed to Sacred Heart
    Projected Weight: 149
×
×
  • Create New...