Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

It's not supposed to count, but apparently it does. Otherwise, Keckeisen's the undefeated returning champ of the weight class. Starocci's the challenger and should be seeded accordingly.

Posted
3 minutes ago, Fletcher said:

It's not supposed to count, but apparently it does. Otherwise, Keckeisen's the undefeated returning champ of the weight class. Starocci's the challenger and should be seeded accordingly.

Any chance they awarded it to Starocci based on being a four time champion while also winning a better conference?  Even if thats not the real reason, maybe they could rationalize it

  • Bob 2
Posted
3 minutes ago, Fletcher said:

It's not supposed to count, but apparently it does. Otherwise, Keckeisen's the undefeated returning champ of the weight class. Starocci's the challenger and should be seeded accordingly.

If want to count past seasons you have to factor in 4 NCAA titles > 1 NCAA title.

Posted
1 minute ago, flyingcement said:

Any chance they awarded it to Starocci based on being a four time champion while also winning a better conference?  Even if thats not the real reason, maybe they could rationalize it

I think the NCAA looks at all conference champs as being equal in their formula.  Any difference in difficulty should be factored into quality wins.

Posted
5 minutes ago, Fletcher said:

It's not supposed to count, but apparently it does. Otherwise, Keckeisen's the undefeated returning champ of the weight class. Starocci's the challenger and should be seeded accordingly.

Maybe he should have just won? But yeah, I would think if coaches are basing their rankings on things that don’t count(assuming they’d never wrestled), being a 4X NC and the Big Ten champion would still have him in the same spot. 

Posted
10 minutes ago, flyingcement said:

Any chance they awarded it to Starocci based on being a four time champion while also winning a better conference?  Even if thats not the real reason, maybe they could rationalize it

Past seasons are not supposed to be a criteria. Look what happened to Ferrari and Alirez.

Though I guess that means Keck's championship last season shouldn't count either?

Maybe it all comes down to the Cael/PSU factor.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Fletcher said:

Past seasons are not supposed to be a criteria. Look what happened to Ferrari and Alirez.

Though I guess that means Keck's championship last season shouldn't count either?

Maybe it all comes down to the Cael/PSU factor.

Starocci won the big ten which is better than the big 12. That is undisputed. 

Posted (edited)

I don't know how the formula works, but Carter is a 4x champ; he beat Keck at the all star match; he beat Ferrari when it wasn't clear he would face Ferrari; and he beat McEnelly. Anybody acting like Keck was wronged is just making stuff up.

At any rate, as a fan, a potential Keck vs. McEnelly match sounds fantastic.

Edited by peanut
Posted
10 minutes ago, Jimmy Cinnabon said:

Starocci won the big ten which is better than the big 12. That is undisputed. 

Keckeisen won his conference too. He has no control over the difficulty level and that shouldn't be held against him.

Speaking of "undisputed" conference difficulty, how many wins does McEnelly (#2 B10) have over Plott (#2B12)?

Posted
27 minutes ago, peanut said:

I don't know how the formula works, but Carter is a 4x champ; he beat Keck at the all star match; he beat Ferrari when it wasn't clear he would face Ferrari; and he beat McEnelly. Anybody acting like Keck was wronged is just making stuff up.

At any rate, as a fan, a potential Keck vs. McEnelly match sounds fantastic.

There is a formula, but I admittedly also don't know how it works. Tried to read the PowerPoint posted by Valenti on Twitter but I'm too dumb for that.

I do know that past championships do not help or Ferrari and Alirez would be seeded higher. All-start match also doesn't count (allegedly). Finally, yes, I do have a tendency to just make stuff up.

Starocci-McEnelly semi and Starocci-Keck final would have been better.

Posted
5 minutes ago, wrestle87 said:

A 4x returning champ has more than enough cred to warrant a one seed.  This doesn’t need to be questioned.

At what weight? 

.

Posted
14 minutes ago, wrestle87 said:

A 4x returning champ has more than enough cred to warrant a one seed.  This doesn’t need to be questioned.

Not the criteria used though.

Posted
5 minutes ago, Fletcher said:

Not the criteria used though.

Well, seeding committees have a history of only taking criteria as suggestions, hence the annual forum pilgrimage to threads (correctly) talking about how insane and actually against the established rules these brackets are.

It’s like the annual sprouting of foliage, it happens literally every year. 

Posted
1 hour ago, Fletcher said:

It's not supposed to count, but apparently it does. Otherwise, Keckeisen's the undefeated returning champ of the weight class. Starocci's the challenger and should be seeded accordingly.

The only metric it really affects is coaches rank, who often copy the ranking services.  But wasn’t Starocci ranked higher by most (maybe all?) services before the All Star anyway?

Posted
46 minutes ago, Fletcher said:

Speaking of "undisputed" conference difficulty, how many wins does McEnelly (#2 B10) have over Plott (#2B12)?

Plott didn't do any favors for the B12 taking a loss to Ferrari

I Don't Agree With What I Posted

Posted
Just now, PortaJohn said:

Plott didn't do any favors for the B12 taking a loss to Ferrari

True. Not a great fact in favor of the B12. Ferrari also didn't compete - for all we know, he may have won B10 now that he's had an initial crack at Starocci and we know he's one takedown away...

Posted

I don't believe in strategizing for a seed in any event.  If you want to win, I think most of all you need to back yourself in all situations.  If you're trying to game the situation, there is a part of you that doesn't believe in yourself

Posted (edited)
51 minutes ago, Fletcher said:

There is a formula, but I admittedly also don't know how it works. Tried to read the PowerPoint posted by Valenti on Twitter but I'm too dumb for that.

I do know that past championships do not help or Ferrari and Alirez would be seeded higher. All-start match also doesn't count (allegedly). Finally, yes, I do have a tendency to just make stuff up.

Starocci-McEnelly semi and Starocci-Keck final would have been better.

You'll get exactly the final you've described. All Keck has to do is beat McEnelly.

Problem solved.

(Assuming, of course, both make it to semi's - as well as Starocci making it to finals. Which is likely, but nowhere near guaranteed.)

Edited by RockLobster
Posted
1 minute ago, RockLobster said:

You'll get exactly the final you've described. All Keck has to do is beat McEnelly (assuming, of course, both make it to semi's - as well as Starocci. Which is anything but guaranteed.)

Problem solved.

Of course you're right - beating one phenomenal athlete is exactly the same as beating two.

Posted
57 minutes ago, Fletcher said:

Starocci-McEnelly semi and Starocci-Keck final would have been better.

Not sure why.  Starocci and McEnelly have already wrestled.  Wouldn't it be better to have Keck and Mc wrestle each other for the first time, then whoever wins (is better) gets to wrestle the 4x champ?  

  • Bob 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Rankings

  • College Commitments

    Co'ji Campbell

    St. Joseph Catholic Academy, Wisconsin
    Class of 2025
    Committed to Illinois
    Projected Weight: 125, 133

    Brady Collins

    Clearfield, Pennsylvania
    Class of 2025
    Committed to Lehigh
    Projected Weight: 165, 174

    Abe Hermes

    Milan Edison, Ohio
    Class of 2025
    Committed to Ohio
    Projected Weight: 141

    Jackson Albert

    Saucon Valley, Pennsylvania
    Class of 2025
    Committed to George Mason
    Projected Weight: 149, 157

    Ryan Hayes

    Methacton, Pennsylvania
    Class of 2025
    Committed to Sacred Heart
    Projected Weight: 149
×
×
  • Create New...