Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Although I think Alirez would probably beat Bartlett, and I slightly favor him over Mendez too, I think Beau should be the new #1.  Both unbeaten and Beau has the stronger strength of schedule, and just beat #1.  That's my rationale, but the real reason is the same as BruceyB's:  I hate the fact that Bartlett and Mendez should have to face off in the semis for a third time just because Alirez never had to wrestle anyone in the top 10.

Posted
  On 2/16/2025 at 3:09 AM, Caveira said:
I assume undefeated alirez gets #1 seed…. If Mendez takes one at bigs.  The Algo and all.   


Alirez won’t have enough matches for an RPI, IIRC.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted
  On 2/18/2025 at 1:51 AM, Wrestleknownothing said:

I would guess WIN is basing it on 1 championship > 0 championships. I would have Bartlett #1 myself.

And Flo drops some time tonight.

Expand  

But Bartlett JUST beat Mendez and it is (and should be) this season's rankings not across seasons.  If they hadn't wrestled this season, sure give Mendez the nod because he pulled out a last second win over Bartlett at NCAAs and beat him at Big Tens (even if Bartlett beat him in the dual last year).  The only way I can see ranking Mendez informally above Bartlett is if you also consider the All-Star match this year, but that is not supposed to count in official rankings

Posted
  On 2/18/2025 at 3:27 AM, SocraTease said:

But Bartlett JUST beat Mendez and it is (and should be) this season's rankings not across seasons.  If they hadn't wrestled this season, sure give Mendez the nod because he pulled out a last second win over Bartlett at NCAAs and beat him at Big Tens (even if Bartlett beat him in the dual last year).  The only way I can see ranking Mendez informally above Bartlett is if you also consider the All-Star match this year, but that is not supposed to count in official rankings

Expand  

As I said, I would have Bartlett #1.

As for using just this season, you still need to prime this season with previous season results.

Drowning in data, but thirsting for knowledge

Posted
  On 2/18/2025 at 12:52 PM, CGriff said:

Yes. Alirez has ducked top 10 guys and has no great wins

Expand  

He hasn't ducked anybody. I just checked his record out.  The only elite guy he "ducked" was Cael Happel, and the idea of Alirez ducking Happel is laughable. He wrestled Composto. He wrestled all the decently ranked guys on his schedule, including Ysaguirre, Tagg, and Drury, all of who will probably make NCAAs. Yeah, no premium wins, but he hasn't ducked anybody. He hasn't wrestled in any tournaments this year though so he only has his dual meet record to go on so far. Northern Colorado has a dual schedule filled with teams that generally don't have great 141 pounders this year, that's not Alirez's fault. 

Alirez will probably win another 5 matches prior to NCAAs, which will make him 16-0. Guys saying he won't have enough matches are cuckoo. 

Posted

I would disagree that he hasn't ducked. NWCA dual tournament he wrestled day 1 but didn't wrestle day 2. Was it a weight issue, was it a duck issue or was it load management? To many it looks like a duck. UNI & Iowa State had most of their team at Soldier Solute. Where where their starters for that?  

Posted
  On 2/18/2025 at 1:58 PM, 666 said:

He hasn't ducked anybody. I just checked his record out.  The only elite guy he "ducked" was Cael Happel, and the idea of Alirez ducking Happel is laughable. He wrestled Composto. He wrestled all the decently ranked guys on his schedule, including Ysaguirre, Tagg, and Drury, all of who will probably make NCAAs. Yeah, no premium wins, but he hasn't ducked anybody. He hasn't wrestled in any tournaments this year though so he only has his dual meet record to go on so far. Northern Colorado has a dual schedule filled with teams that generally don't have great 141 pounders this year, that's not Alirez's fault. 

Alirez will probably win another 5 matches prior to NCAAs, which will make him 16-0. Guys saying he won't have enough matches are cuckoo. 

Expand  

Why is it laughable to say he (well, Nickerson) ducked Happel?

One of the tournaments he didn’t wrestle in was won by Vombaur.

Posted
  On 2/18/2025 at 4:27 PM, 1032004 said:

Why is it laughable to say he (well, Nickerson) ducked Happel?

One of the tournaments he didn’t wrestle in was won by Vombaur.

Expand  

Because Alirez is a lot better than Happel. 

Posted
  On 2/18/2025 at 4:42 PM, 666 said:

I'll sig bet you right now that if Alirez wrestles Happel that Alirez wins. 

Expand  

I’ll bet you that he won’t tech fall him.  Which is what someone “a lot better” would do.

Posted
  On 2/18/2025 at 4:46 PM, 1032004 said:

I’ll bet you that he won’t tech fall him.  Which is what someone “a lot better” would do.

Expand  

I've seen guys who won 2-0 who were a lot better than their opponents. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...