Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
On 1/14/2025 at 1:21 PM, Le duke said:

If you turn on all of the fire hydrants, some of them aren't going to have water. Over a large enough network, with enough open valves, no matter how much water you have feeding it, you will run out of pressure. The end. Turns out, when you have fire spread out over an area that large, you meet those conditions. You can do the same thing with your household irrigation system, at a much smaller scale. 

Now, if you're suggesting that the civil engineering standards should be updated to meet newer threats and resultant requirements, sure, I'd agree with you. But the water delivery system is not "bad"; it's built to a known standard that is, for lack of a better term, outdated. But that's still the standard.

lol. does the government own you or something?

they 

1) cut 17m in funding

2) didn't use 7b allotted for improvements

3) didn't have the reservoir filled

4) cut forest management

and you're dying on the hill that 'stuff happens and nothing could have been done better and there's no one to blame'

keep going. this is incredible. 

  • Bob 2

TBD

Posted
lol. does the government own you or something?
they 
1) cut 17m in funding
2) didn't use 7b allotted for improvements
3) didn't have the reservoir filled
4) cut forest management
and you're dying on the hill that 'stuff happens and nothing could have been done better and there's no one to blame'
keep going. this is incredible. 

Because you insist on continually opening your trap and acting like the fool we know you to be:

1) The overall FD budget increased.
2) Eminent domain cases take a long time. Look those words up.
3) There are a half dozen other reservoirs that supply water to this area. Those reservoirs are above their historical averages. Overall supply was not an issue. Local pressure at hydrants was the problem. But, this is well beyond your ability to comprehend, so I’ll move on.
4) CAL FIRE’s budget has grown every year since 2019. From $2.5 billion, with 7,100 personnel to $4.2 billion and 12,511 personnel in 2024-2025.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted
4 minutes ago, headshuck said:


Everyone agrees more could have been done to prepare.

I know 1 person who doesn’t agree.   I’ll protect their secret identity though.  

  • Haha 2
Posted
53 minutes ago, Le duke said:


Because you insist on continually opening your trap and acting like the fool we know you to be:

1) The overall FD budget increased.
2) Eminent domain cases take a long time. Look those words up.
3) There are a half dozen other reservoirs that supply water to this area. Those reservoirs are above their historical averages. Overall supply was not an issue. Local pressure at hydrants was the problem. But, this is well beyond your ability to comprehend, so I’ll move on.
4) CAL FIRE’s budget has grown every year since 2019. From $2.5 billion, with 7,100 personnel to $4.2 billion and 12,511 personnel in 2024-2025.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

deflect, deflect, deflect

you gotta be a full scale cuck to make excuses for the government the way you do.

let's just throw our hands up. nothing could have been done (despite the trillions californians pay in taxes)

you're a loser. 

  • Bob 1

TBD

Posted
53 minutes ago, Le duke said:


Because you insist on continually opening your trap and acting like the fool we know you to be:

1) The overall FD budget increased.
2) Eminent domain cases take a long time. Look those words up.
3) There are a half dozen other reservoirs that supply water to this area. Those reservoirs are above their historical averages. Overall supply was not an issue. Local pressure at hydrants was the problem. But, this is well beyond your ability to comprehend, so I’ll move on.
4) CAL FIRE’s budget has grown every year since 2019. From $2.5 billion, with 7,100 personnel to $4.2 billion and 12,511 personnel in 2024-2025.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

So you think the leadership did a great job before, during and after this??

Posted
deflect, deflect, deflect
you gotta be a full scale cuck to make excuses for the government the way you do.
let's just throw our hands up. nothing could have been done (despite the trillions californians pay in taxes)
you're a loser. 


Deflect… with facts? Everything you said above was a lie or half-truth.

Hell, you can’t stop lying even now. Californians don’t pay (present tense) trillions in taxes. In 2023, they paid 220 billion in state and 507 billion in federal taxes. That’s not even one trillion, let alone several trillions.

All of this stuff is easily looked up if you have any passing interest in the truth.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted
7 minutes ago, Le duke said:

 


Deflect… with facts? Everything you said above was a lie or half-truth.

Hell, you can’t stop lying even now. Californians don’t pay (present tense) trillions in taxes. In 2023, they paid 220 billion in state and 507 billion in federal taxes. That’s not even one trillion, let alone several trillions.

All of this stuff is easily looked up if you have any passing interest in the truth.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Which states pay more in taxes?

Posted
Which states pay more in taxes?

I didn’t say that anyone pays more. The claim I contradicted was that Californians pay (present tense) trillions in taxes; they don’t.

But, if you are so inclined, you can look up per-capita state and federal taxes. It’s all out there. I’m guessing DC and NY pay more state tax income tax on a per-capita basis but, again, just a guess.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted

But you are not answering the question.   Husker was obviously being hyperbolic much like you are in excusing the government and absolving them of any  culpability in this wreck of an incident response.  

To put your argument into perspective, Californians pay 0.22 Trillions in state taxes and 0.507 Trillions in Federal taxes.   You see, they pay trillions in taxes.   Stupid  argument to pick UB.

mspart

Posted
16 hours ago, Le duke said:

 The claim I contradicted was that Californians pay (present tense) trillions in taxes; they don’t.

But they should correct? 

.

Posted

 

On 1/15/2025 at 2:39 PM, Husker_Du said:

lol. does the government own you or something?

they 

1) cut 17m in funding

2) didn't use 7b allotted for improvements

3) didn't have the reservoir filled

4) cut forest management

and you're dying on the hill that 'stuff happens and nothing could have been done better and there's no one to blame'

keep going. this is incredible. 

These west coast leaders still over performing?    Fires still burning + new ones?

  • A new fire, the Hughes Fire, forced mandatory evacuation orders and warnings in the Los Angeles County community of Castaic on Wednesday, authorities said.
  • Fires across the L.A. area have killed at least 28 people, destroyed more than 15,000 structures and charred some 63 square miles. The Palisades and Eaton wildfires continue to burn today.

https://www.cbsnews.com/amp/live-updates/la-fires-southern-california-high-winds-wildfire-risk/

Posted
4 hours ago, Caveira said:

 

These west coast leaders still over performing?    Fires still burning + new ones?

 

  • A new fire, the Hughes Fire, forced mandatory evacuation orders and warnings in the Los Angeles County community of Castaic on Wednesday, authorities said.
  • Fires across the L.A. area have killed at least 28 people, destroyed more than 15,000 structures and charred some 63 square miles. The Palisades and Eaton wildfires continue to burn today.

 

https://www.cbsnews.com/amp/live-updates/la-fires-southern-california-high-winds-wildfire-risk/

I realized I quoted the wrong person.  It’s @Le duke who thought the gov was over performing wasn’t it?   What say you sir duke?

Posted
12 hours ago, Caveira said:

I realized I quoted the wrong person.  It’s @Le duke who thought the gov was over performing wasn’t it?   What say you sir duke?

I think he said there was plenty of water it just wasn't in the hydrants???

Posted
I realized I quoted the wrong person.  It’s [mention=70]Le duke[/mention] who thought the gov was over performing wasn’t it?   What say you sir duke?

Where did I say that anyone was “over performing”?

Are you drunk again?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted
3 minutes ago, Le duke said:


Where did I say that anyone was “over performing”?

Are you drunk again?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

You for said the gov was not to blame.   Apologies for saying that is over performing.  
 

are they still not to blame here.   Or how long do the fires need to continue in your opinion to start criticizing Cali leadership for not doing enough ?   I mean.  Only 138 of so folks have died so far.  

Posted
On 1/23/2025 at 12:58 PM, Le duke said:


Where did I say that anyone was “over performing”?

Are you drunk again?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The La mayor…. Is she still doing a good job?

 

Posted
Depends on how you take it. Could the executive orders be intended to open the floodgates of bureaucracy?

What will this EO do, other than put more water in reservoirs that are already quite full?

As soon as they hit their max, and most are quite close, they will start draining water down their spillways into the Pacific. The end.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...