Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, Caveira said:

I got caught with similar comment before.  Don’t know when they changed it.  I prefer the going into the tourney record fwiw.   

Agree, makes it easier to under stand the seeds. 

.

Posted
19 minutes ago, Caveira said:

I got caught with similar comment before.  Don’t know when they changed it.  I prefer the going into the tourney record fwiw.   

If you are looking at wrestlingstats, I think they have pulled their brackets from multiple sources since the original set was complied by J Hammond

Drowning in data, but thirsting for knowledge

Posted
2 minutes ago, Wrestleknownothing said:

If you are looking at wrestlingstats, I think they have pulled their brackets from multiple sources since the original set was complied by J Hammond

Brackets I looked at were the final pdf. 

.

Posted
34 minutes ago, Truzzcat said:

Ill go in order of most to least confident:

Gable
Hendrickson
Parker
Alirez
Mendez
Henson
Crookham
Ramos
KOT
Hamiti
AJ Ferrari (I'm putting into place a 10-match minimum which I could see him not hitting)
 

I am confused how to read this. You have two heavyweights as favorites over anyone at any other weight, and two 141's and two 174's, but no 157's or 165's ?

And is that DJ Parker you have favored over Starocci? And by more than Crookham is favored over other 133's? 

Drowning in data, but thirsting for knowledge

Posted
56 minutes ago, Wrestleknownothing said:

I am confused how to read this. You have two heavyweights as favorites over anyone at any other weight, and two 141's and two 174's, but no 157's or 165's ?

And is that DJ Parker you have favored over Starocci? And by more than Crookham is favored over other 133's? 

The op is none psu wrestlers. So I excluded all of those guys and factored in schedules. Wyatt and Gable, I have the most confidence going into NCAA's unshaved and so on from there. Not picks to win NCAA's per say just to go in undefeated.

Posted
7 minutes ago, Truzzcat said:

The op is none psu wrestlers. So I excluded all of those guys and factored in schedules. Wyatt and Gable, I have the most confidence going into NCAA's unshaved and so on from there. Not picks to win NCAA's per say just to go in undefeated.

I am an idiot. I was thinking it was the other thread. My apologies.

Drowning in data, but thirsting for knowledge

Posted
5 minutes ago, Wrestleknownothing said:

I am an idiot. I was thinking it was the other thread. My apologies.

"hide" can be the friend of idiots and morons.  🙂

.

Posted
10 minutes ago, ionel said:

"hide" can be the friend of idiots and morons.  🙂

It can also be a friend of cowards. I only hide to replace with more accurate information.

When I am purely wrong in an uncorrectable way, sunshine is the best antiseptic.

Time to take my lumps.

Drowning in data, but thirsting for knowledge

Posted (edited)
25 minutes ago, Wrestleknownothing said:

It can also be a friend of cowards. I only hide to replace with more accurate information.

When I am purely wrong in an uncorrectable way, sunshine is the best antiseptic.

Time to take my lumps.

How virtuous of you...:classic_dry:

Edited by MPhillips

.

Posted
9 hours ago, RawDog said:

Ramos

I'm not disputing this at all, but it would appear to be crazy on the surface given a) the unpredictability of 125 in recent years (which Ramos is the poster child for);  and b) Ramos campaign last year.  

But he has been great this year, and it is certainly conceivable.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...