Let The Money Printing Begin

[red viking]

Just now, Bigbrog said:

LOL...It isn't diverting from any conversation other than to show how "factual" you are with your outrageous claims. 

But carry on...I do actually think you are a lot more levelheaded and probably an okay guy to hang out with unlike RL, that Saylor whackadoodle, and the trip dude.

Yah. Saying Jan 6 instead of Jan 20 was an "outrageous claims." That's a much more outrageous claim in itself. 

[Bigbrog]

3 minutes ago, red viking said:

https://www.cnbc.com/2024/11/05/us-treasury-yields-as-traders-await-results-of-presidential-race.html

 

The general thinking on Wall Street ahead of the election was that bond yields could see a big pop in the event of a Trump win, and they could surge in a Republican sweep, where the party captures control of Congress and the White House. That is because Republicans may introduce tax cuts and steep tariffs, moves that could spark economic growth, but also widen the fiscal deficit and reignite inflation.

Funny this reads as an opinion piece as they don't quote any person from Wall Street, thus making the statement "The general thinking on Wall Street...." is in no way backed up.  The article then makes an attempt to quote Jeramy Siegel a Wharton Collage professor and liberal news network contributor, but when you actually look into the guy here is a quote second paragraph in under Investment Advice:

"He recommends against holding bonds, arguing their long-term performance tends to be negative after inflation. Siegel's position on bonds has been disputed, with critics proposing his data is flawed due to use of unreliable information from earlier sources"  Jeremy Siegel - Wikipedia

May want to use other sources for your "facts" there RV

 

[Bigbrog]

7 minutes ago, red viking said:

Yah. Saying Jan 6 instead of Jan 20 was an "outrageous claims." That's a much more outrageous claim in itself. 

I'll type slow buddy...you making outrageous claims by using incorrect "facts" tends to make your claims even more unbelievable...get it??

[Interviewed_at_Weehawken]

16 minutes ago, red viking said:

It means absolutely nothing relevant to the topic at hand. It's sometime In January. whether it's Jan 6 or 20th has absolutely zero bearing on any of the previous points made. It's pathetic to try to make an issue about it. 

We have already established that dates are important.  Maybe you forgot to vote yesterday?  I'm sure you can go anytime in November! dates don't matter!

[red viking]

5 minutes ago, Interviewed_at_Weehawken said:

We have already established that dates are important.  Maybe you forgot to vote yesterday?  I'm sure you can go anytime in November! dates don't matter!

continued diversion from the topic, disputing facts that have zero bearing on the topic. It demonstrates how pathetic your argument is. 

[red viking]

12 minutes ago, Bigbrog said:

Funny this reads as an opinion piece as they don't quote any person from Wall Street, thus making the statement "The general thinking on Wall Street...." is in no way backed up.  The article then makes an attempt to quote Jeramy Siegel a Wharton Collage professor and liberal news network contributor, but when you actually look into the guy here is a quote second paragraph in under Investment Advice:

"He recommends against holding bonds, arguing their long-term performance tends to be negative after inflation. Siegel's position on bonds has been disputed, with critics proposing his data is flawed due to use of unreliable information from earlier sources"  Jeremy Siegel - Wikipedia

May want to use other sources for your "facts" there RV

 

The market doesn't lie. Please explain to me why bond yields AND stocks would shoot up so much on the same overnight. I asked before and I'm still waiting. 

[red viking]

The wingers are pathetic. Unbelievably sad. Instead of providing any rational explanation for what happened last night they repeatedly attack me for saying Trump starts his term Jan 6 instead of Jan 20 (my point was that he isn't President yet). 

Keep diverting away from the much more important topic. Typical of the wingers. Cowardly. 

Edited November 6 by red viking

[red viking]

For the 3rd time. 

Why did stock and, more importantly, bond yields, jump up so much early this morning? 

[ionel]

49 minutes ago, red viking said:

The wingers are pathetic. Unbelievably sad.

Yes it is a very sad day for pathetic left wingers, might I suggest adopt a puppy.    

[jross]

inflation is a reason…

and you are not going to get off easy until your media truth bubble bursts… 

[Offthemat]

3 minutes ago, red viking said:

For the 3rd time. 

Why did stock and, more importantly, bond yields, jump up so much early this morning? 

When you figure out the stock and bond markets you can make a lot of money and then get a radio or tv show and sell a lot of books.  In the meantime, you might hear that the market trades on emotion. 

[VakAttack]

We'll see.  The last two weeks Trump and Musk have been going around openly admitting the economy is going to be crushed for a couple of years under their plans as they "reset" the economy.  I'm sure it will be great.

[red viking]

24 minutes ago, jross said:

inflation is a reason…

and you are not going to get off easy until your media truth bubble bursts… 

Not the media. I looked specifically at the markets very early this morning. I found the article later. 

[red viking]

28 minutes ago, Offthemat said:

When you figure out the stock and bond markets you can make a lot of money and then get a radio or tv show and sell a lot of books.  In the meantime, you might hear that the market trades on emotion. 

The market over-reacts in the short-term quite often, but the reaction itself is based upon cold hard facts. It already happened. If you want to truly make money, you have to get the info before other people do. Most of this trading actually occurred late last night and early this morning before the markets even opened. 

Looking to see how the markets react to new information provides great insight into how the latest information will affect the economy. This isn't opinions of right-wing hacks like you see on Fox News. This is the actual market, controlled by thousands of traders that are just trying to make money; not provide a spin like you see on Fox. 

Edited November 6 by red viking

[ionel]

1 minute ago, red viking said:

The market over-reacts in the short-term quite often, but the reaction itself is based upon cold hard facts. It already happened. If you want to truly make money, you have to get the info before other people do. Most of this trading actually occurred late last night and early this morning before the markets even opened. 

this is why I read all of rv's posts, I want to be the first to get the info. 

[red viking]

I'll ask for the 4th time now. Why did bond yields shoot up so much early this morning? 

The wingers can keep running from me but they can't hide. 

[Caveira]

36 minutes ago, red viking said:

I'll ask for the 4th time now. Why did bond yields shoot up so much early this morning? 

The wingers can keep running from me but they can't hide. 

The market likes trump 

[Bigbrog]

1 hour ago, VakAttack said:

We'll see.  The last two weeks Trump and Musk have been going around openly admitting the economy is going to be crushed for a couple of years under their plans as they "reset" the economy.  I'm sure it will be great.

So now DT doesn't lie??

[Interviewed_at_Weehawken]

2 hours ago, red viking said:

I'll ask for the 4th time now. Why did bond yields shoot up so much early this morning? 

The wingers can keep running from me but they can't hide. 

You make multiple absurd statements with no basis in fact and wonder why people won't engage with your foolishness.  I'm done with your trolling.  Good day sir!

[red viking]

2 hours ago, Caveira said:

The market likes trump 

So skyrocketing bond yields indicate future  lower inflation and balanced budgets? Is that winger economic theory? 

Edited November 6 by red viking

[Caveira]

4 hours ago, red viking said:

So skyrocketing bond yields indicate future  lower inflation and balanced budgets? Is that winger economic theory? 

Ain’t that a thang brother.   Have a nice day.