Kamala Harris: I did not ban fracking. I will not ban fracking. But wink, wink I will regulate you out of existence.

[Paul158]

Kamala doesn't need to ban fracking. She and the powers that be can regulate the Fracking Industry out of existence. They, Biden and Harris already have regulations in place that are harming the fracking industry. Remember the Keystone pipeline? Just watch them!!!

[Offthemat]

She doesn’t have to ban fracking if she bans natural gas for use in cooking, heating, and export. 

[Lipdrag]

Courts are becoming less and less amused by the swampies (i.e. agencies of the executive branch) violating the constitution by acting through intermediaries to do what they are banned from doing. 

The Bidenistas are about to be convicted (I use the term loosely) of First Amendment violations of US citizens.  Additionally, maybe the overturning of the fiasco formerly known as the Chevron Ruling will provide a bit more protection for us against the swamp people.  Congress has abdicated but at least this Supreme Court has some members who seem to understand that their role is to protect the people from the government - a limited power government - so that the people do not have to resort to more drastic means of putting the government in its rightful place.

[Scouts Honor]

um...

 

[mspart]

She looks very pleased doesn't she?    OUCH!!!

mspart

[Offthemat]

The claim that she favors building the wall results from her call for passing the ‘bipartisan legislation’ that was turned down with a bipartisan vote, contained language that would force a minimal amount of spending on the wall. 

[Scouts Honor]

 

[Offthemat]

A better explanation of the errant claim that komrade kamela supports building the border wall:
 

https://www.thethinkingconservative.com/no-kamala-harris-hasnt-promised-to-build-a-border-wall/

 

 

“Another canard in the same Axios article is the claim that Trump “ordered his allies to kill” the Senate Border Act, “fearing it would help Democrats in the November elections.”

That common allegation is derived from a post that Trump made on Truth Social in which he stated, “This Bill is a great gift to the Democrats, and a Death Wish for The Republican Party.”

Contradicting the Democrat and media spin that Trump opposes the bill because he doesn’t want the border crisis fixed before the election, Trump wrote in the very same post that the bill must be defeated because it:

• “only gives Shutdown Authority after 5000 Encounters a day, when we already have the right to CLOSE THE BORDER NOW, which must be done.”
• “takes the HORRIBLE JOB the Democrats have done on Immigration and the Border, absolves them, and puts it all squarely on the shoulders of Republicans.”

In summary, the claim that Kamala Harris promised to build a border wall has no basis in reality and bolsters counterfactual propaganda that Democrats are strong on border security. Meanwhile, Democrats universally opposed a strong border bill, and objective measures show that the border has been far less secure under Biden and Harris than ever recorded in the nation’s history.

James D. Agresti is the president of Just Facts, a research and educational institute dedicated to publishing facts about public policies and teaching research skills.“

[Scouts Honor]

omg you mean the dems pushed a lie again? 

[Lipdrag]

8 hours ago, Offthemat said:

 objective measures show that the border has been far less secure under Biden and Harris than ever

Objective measures are RACIST!!!!  And SEXIST!!!  Numbers have no feelings so therefore they do not feel the Kam-eleon's truth. 

And her believed truth is that she secured the border when she wasn't the border czar in charge of root cause analysis.  Oh, by the way, the root cause analysis concluded by her and her compatriots on the Hate/Blame America First left have determined that the people were crossing the border to get into America illegally in record numbers is because America sucks.  Joy.

 

[Scouts Honor]

but some random guy on twitter posted this

 

[headshuck]

There might be one hour of one day that border crossings are ZERO!

[ThreePointTakedown]

Good. 

Oil is a hugely profitable and hugely subsidized industry. If its going to die. Let it. The bike industry will take off for a minute then electricity will and nuclear power will finally have their day and the planet can stop choking to death. 

Why are people that are against citizens getting welfare not against oil getting it too? 

[Offthemat]

^^^ Economics for stupid people.  And you can’t make electricity without oil. 

[Scouts Honor]

wondering how all the poor welfare people will fare without petroleum

[Caveira]

1 hour ago, ThreePointTakedown said:

Good. 

Oil is a hugely profitable and hugely subsidized industry. If its going to die. Let it. The bike industry will take off for a minute then electricity will and nuclear power will finally have their day and the planet can stop choking to death. 

Why are people that are against citizens getting welfare not against oil getting it too? 

https://youtu.be/DpLC2pLe6-E?si=VA9uh418qQw0tmlj

[headshuck]

^^^ Economics for stupid people.  And you can’t make electricity without oil. 

There’s always converting farmland to wind and solar.

[Offthemat]

That rates right up there with leaving the oil in the ground and burning your food for fuel. 

[Scouts Honor]

 

 

[Offthemat]

 

[ionel]

5 minutes ago, Offthemat said:

 

We now know the first Executive Order.  I'm not saying folks should start hording white coffee cup lids but ya'll remember covid and toilet paper ...