Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Shooter was shot and has been pronounced dead. There several other people wounded. Possibly one person was fatality shot.

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, headshuck said:

 

It seems inconceivable that there could be a security failure of this magnitude. !50 to 200 yards away for any killer is nothing. Could this guy be hired gun? They say he had no I.D. on him. Is it possible he is a hired assassin? 

Edited by Paul158
  • Brain 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Paul158 said:

It seems inconceivable that there could be a security failure of this magnitude. !50 to 200 yards away for any killer is nothing. Could this guy be hired gun? They say he had no I.D. on him. Is it possible he is a hired assassin? 

i doubt a hired assassin would miss a shot like that. 

Posted
35 minutes ago, uncle bernard said:

i doubt a hired assassin would miss a shot like that. 

I doubt you have a clue you pos

  • Bob 1
Posted

Correction to OP - "hit him on the side of the head" is incorrect.

He's fine. The blood was coming from his ear, not his head. 

Specifically, the upper part of the ear where fake wrestlers have cut themselves (or people close to them did) for decades to use real blood to make fake incidents look real without doing any real damage at all.

That was right before the "iconic" photos. Not my word, that word has already been posted by Trump fans all over the place, and is already being used as a promotional tool. It's even been used here in the other thread on the topic.

Oh, and right after Trump started his brief speech where he was constantly looking to his right for some odd reason. That struck me as quite odd as I watched it. But - then again, if he looked directly at the audience, there could be no explanation how his ear could have stopped a bullet without hitting his head.

I won't even get started on the BBC interview about the people who were pointing out the guy with the rifle on the roof while SS and police ignored them.

No conspiracy theory here. Just some thoughts to share.

It'll be interesting to find out the 'shooter's story - and if anybody in the audience was hurt (at this point, that has been reported, but not yet confirmed.)

One thing that is guaranteed. This will keep Trump in the headlines and conversations for the next week.

  • Poopy 1
Posted
47 minutes ago, RockLobster said:

Correction to OP - "hit him on the side of the head" is incorrect.

He's fine. The blood was coming from his ear, not his head. 

Specifically, the upper part of the ear where fake wrestlers have cut themselves (or people close to them did) for decades to use real blood to make fake incidents look real without doing any real damage at all.

That was right before the "iconic" photos. Not my word, that word has already been posted by Trump fans all over the place, and is already being used as a promotional tool. It's even been used here in the other thread on the topic.

Oh, and right after Trump started his brief speech where he was constantly looking to his right for some odd reason. That struck me as quite odd as I watched it. But - then again, if he looked directly at the audience, there could be no explanation how his ear could have stopped a bullet without hitting his head.

I won't even get started on the BBC interview about the people who were pointing out the guy with the rifle on the roof while SS and police ignored them.

No conspiracy theory here. Just some thoughts to share.

It'll be interesting to find out the 'shooter's story - and if anybody in the audience was hurt (at this point, that has been reported, but not yet confirmed.)

One thing that is guaranteed. This will keep Trump in the headlines and conversations for the next week.

Photos seemed to show that it grazed the skin on the side of the head before it hit his ear.  But photos can be deceptive and isn't the ear on "the side of the head?"  Wait ... what was your point? 

  • Bob 1

2BPE 11/17/24 SMC

Posted
2 hours ago, Caveira said:

Holy pants on fire! Watch it while the link still works, folks.

You've got access to the burning gun (literally and figuratively) on video.

Pay particularly close attention to the SS sniper shooting (listen and count the shots) while Trump (who is looking constantly to his right) says "take a look" then covers his ear and kneels down.

This thing is starting to stink like crazy.

 

Posted
1 hour ago, RockLobster said:

Correction to OP - "hit him on the side of the head" is incorrect.

He's fine. The blood was coming from his ear, not his head. 

Specifically, the upper part of the ear where fake wrestlers have cut themselves (or people close to them did) for decades to use real blood to make fake incidents look real without doing any real damage at all.

That was right before the "iconic" photos. Not my word, that word has already been posted by Trump fans all over the place, and is already being used as a promotional tool. It's even been used here in the other thread on the topic.

Oh, and right after Trump started his brief speech where he was constantly looking to his right for some odd reason. That struck me as quite odd as I watched it. But - then again, if he looked directly at the audience, there could be no explanation how his ear could have stopped a bullet without hitting his head.

I won't even get started on the BBC interview about the people who were pointing out the guy with the rifle on the roof while SS and police ignored them.

No conspiracy theory here. Just some thoughts to share.

It'll be interesting to find out the 'shooter's story - and if anybody in the audience was hurt (at this point, that has been reported, but not yet confirmed.)

One thing that is guaranteed. This will keep Trump in the headlines and conversations for the next week.

You are one sick fool.. Please go to another forum. 

  • Bob 1
  • Fire 1
Posted
8 minutes ago, Paul158 said:

You are one sick fool.. Please go to another forum. 

Put your loyalty in your pocket. Then wake up and use your eyes and your brain.

You just saw something that was scripted.

Posted
15 minutes ago, Paul158 said:

Scripted? Reality. Dead. Must have been a really bad script.

He may be right about the smell, but wrong about the direction.  Fletcher Prouty advised that coups happen not with a superior force making an assault, but rather when the guard is pulled back just enough to let the assassin in.  For all the praise the Secret Service is getting, they didn’t prevent anything.  

Posted

Not at all saying it is a scripted ploy, BUT if it were, ‘hiring’ someone who doesn’t know better, with full promise of their security, then giving them blanks and walking them to their death so that they cannot talk after, is not exactly a stretch of the imagination. 
 

I don’t know about ploy but there is a lot of wow here.  Shooter being able to get to a rooftop in that location is very wow. 

  • Fire 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, WrestlingRasta said:

Not at all saying it is a scripted ploy, BUT if it were, ‘hiring’ someone who doesn’t know better, with full promise of their security, then giving them blanks and walking them to their death so that they cannot talk after, is not exactly a stretch of the imagination. 
 

I don’t know about ploy but there is a lot of wow here.  Shooter being able to get to a rooftop in that location is very wow. 

The ‘ploy’ is to not shoot the shooter until he’s done his job or becomes a liability.  He wasn’t shooting blanks. 

Posted
8 minutes ago, Offthemat said:

The ‘ploy’ is to not shoot the shooter until he’s done his job or becomes a liability.  He wasn’t shooting blanks. 

I’m not trying to explained what happened, I’m simply saying the shooter being dead means absolutely nothing to the question posed by RL. 

  • Brain 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, WrestlingRasta said:

I’m not trying to explained what happened, I’m simply saying the shooter being dead means absolutely nothing to the question posed by RL. 

You mean the question posed by Paul?  RL doesn’t know what he’s seeing.  Trump was looking and gesturing to the right because there was a screen there displaying charts and graphs that he was speaking about. 

  • Poopy 1
Posted (edited)

I’m saying that if this was a ploy, as RL is suggesting, the shooter being dead does nothing to as far as evidence of not being a ploy. I’m saying a shooter being set up to walk into his own death in that kind of a situation is not a stretch. 

Edited by WrestlingRasta
  • Brain 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...