Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
5 hours ago, mspart said:

What kid wouldn't have loved that contraption.   Danger, fun, you have it all. 

mspart

Oh yeah, the goal was to get the swing going as high as you could and then jump. 

  • Fire 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, Offthemat said:

Oh yeah, the goal was to get the swing going as high as you could and then jump. 

I always thought the goal was to go fast enough to do a full loop.  🙂

2BPE 11/17/24 SMC

Posted
17 hours ago, Offthemat said:

Oh yeah, the goal was to get the swing going as high as you could and then jump. 

 

17 hours ago, ionel said:

I always thought the goal was to go fast enough to do a full loop.  🙂

I tried the full loop thing.   I got up there and lost pull on the chain and that unnerved me.   I figured I'd let others try.   Never seen it done!!    I would also go as high as I could and jump.   Did well at that.  But those were smaller heights swings.   Those there are serious!!!

mspart

Posted
3 hours ago, mspart said:

 

I tried the full loop thing.   I got up there and lost pull on the chain and that unnerved me.   I figured I'd let others try.   Never seen it done!!    I would also go as high as I could and jump.   Did well at that.  But those were smaller heights swings.   Those there are serious!!!

mspart

I found when you get up there, feels like 60 to 90 degrees, and get slack in the chain you realize the loop ain't gonna happen.  The jump always worked.  🙂

  • Fire 1

2BPE 11/17/24 SMC

Posted
2 hours ago, ionel said:

I found when you get up there, feels like 60 to 90 degrees, and get slack in the chain you realize the loop ain't gonna happen.  The jump always worked.  🙂

Did you ever jump out on the backswing?

Posted

Has the original poster acknowledged their mistake? OP consistently asks others if they will admit their errors. Some of us do admit when we're wrong.

  • Fire 3
Posted
1 hour ago, jross said:

Has the original poster acknowledged their mistake? OP consistently asks others if they will admit their errors. Some of us do admit when we're wrong.

You’re probably wrong if you think that’s going to happen. 

Posted
2 hours ago, jross said:

Has the original poster acknowledged their mistake? OP consistently asks others if they will admit their errors. Some of us do admit when we're wrong.

 

22 minutes ago, Offthemat said:

You’re probably wrong if you think that’s going to happen. 

The OP could use the >edit >hide function and then this entire incorrectly title thread would go away.  

2BPE 11/17/24 SMC

Posted
4 hours ago, jross said:

Has the original poster acknowledged their mistake? OP consistently asks others if they will admit their errors. Some of us do admit when we're wrong.

Would love to see evidence that you have admitted you are wrong. Please include in your response? Just kidding I know you won't. 

Seeing as you included no detail of what it was, can I ask, what was I mistaken about?

Posted
1 minute ago, ThreePointTakedown said:

Again, how incorrectly titled? Please explain. 

There is no evidence and no one is saying (not even the mom) that anyone was  "beaten."   Aa far as we can tell it was 3 girls with water against them and one fell and hit there head.  

2BPE 11/17/24 SMC

Posted
On 2/28/2024 at 12:55 PM, headshuck said:

Impressions and clicks. No cleanup necessary. On to the next.

State Senator of Oklahoma called groups of people in his state, 'Filth'. 

Again, not that this rhetoric contributed to the incident in question because of the time. But don't you think that using words like that could to describe an entire group of human beings could lead someone with a proclivity for violence to put their thoughts into action after hearing something like this from a lawmaker? 

Posted
13 minutes ago, ThreePointTakedown said:

State Senator of Oklahoma called groups of people in his state, 'Filth'. 

That doesn't have anything to do with your inaccurate thread.  I'm sure we can find a state rep from just about any state that made a disgusting remark about a group of people.  

2BPE 11/17/24 SMC

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Latest Rankings

  • College Commitments

    Jaelynn Serna

    Apple Valley, California
    Class of 2025
    Committed to Missouri Valley
    Projected Weight: 110

    Sarina Gunn

    Woodbridge, Virginia
    Class of 2025
    Committed to Cumberlands (Women)
    Projected Weight: 103, 110

    Caitlyn Sohm

    South Sioux City, Nebraska
    Class of 2025
    Committed to York (NE - Women)
    Projected Weight: 207

    Trey Smith

    Cody, Wyoming
    Class of 2025
    Committed to Binghamton
    Projected Weight: 133

    Conor Delaney

    Rumson Fair Haven, New Jersey
    Class of 2025
    Committed to Princeton
    Projected Weight: 197
×
×
  • Create New...