Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Screenshot_20240213-075745_Chrome.thumb.jpg.2a604b83d981f3a2c967a6d17b86dbbf.jpg

Biden complaining about Bidenomics.  He's not getting his fair share of ice-cream.  Maybe Dr Jill should remind him they are multi-millionaires and he can buy two scoops.  🙄

  • Fire 1

2BPE 11/17/24 SMC

Posted
1 hour ago, ionel said:

Screenshot_20240213-075745_Chrome.thumb.jpg.2a604b83d981f3a2c967a6d17b86dbbf.jpg

Biden complaining about Bidenomics.  He's not getting his fair share of ice-cream.  Maybe Dr Jill should remind him they are multi-millionaires and he can buy two scoops.  🙄

I believe the American voter has seen shrinkflation ( Cognitive decline) especially in the case of the current president Joe Biden since he has been in office. 

Posted

Price index was high today,   stocks are way down.   Cognitive dissonance.   Biden or his handlers obviously cannot understand simple economic principles that a 6th grader can understand. 

mspart

  • Fire 1
Posted
50 minutes ago, red viking said:

Whats worse? Somebody that's dumb or evil? 

The one is dumb and evil the other is just evil. I will take the evil one.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Ohio Elite said:

Stupid questions get Stupid answers.

If the evil one he speaks of had been reelected we would not have 300,000 illegal immigrants (border crisis)coming across our border each month. Putin would have never invaded Ukraine. Hamas would have never attacked Israel. Iran would not be days away from having enough enriched uranium to make nuclear bombs. The evil one would not have allowed a war on gas and oil company's in America. We would be energy independent. WE would not be forgiving 150 billion dollars in legitimate, legal student loans. America would not have had to endure some of the highest inflation in decades. Home ownership would be more affordable because of lower interest rates. So yes as you have called him the evil one would be my choice.

  • Fire 1
Posted (edited)

Someone should really come up with a pro con page for both.   Just calling them dumb and evil misses the mark every time.   We had 4 years of one and 3 years of the other.   We should be able to objectively judge between the two based on their policy results.

mspart

Edited by mspart
  • Fire 2
Posted
3 hours ago, mspart said:

Someone should really come up with a pro con page for both.   Just calling them dumb and evil misses the mark every time.   We had 4 years of one and 3 years of the other.   We should be able to objectively judge between the two based on their policy results.

mspart

If that page could have open minded, objective participants acting in a non-partisan-vindictive manner......that would be a very interesting discussion.

Do you see any chance in hell of that happening here??

Posted
34 minutes ago, WrestlingRasta said:

If that page could have open minded, objective participants acting in a non-partisan-vindictive manner......that would be a very interesting discussion.

Do you see any chance in hell of that happening here??

You can give it a try.  Put your heart and soul into it like your smoked meats. 

mspart

  • Fire 1
  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)
36 minutes ago, WrestlingRasta said:

No one is required to comprehend what they are reading....but it helps

 

if you’re saying I didn’t understand then you might have just done the same thing.  😂   I saw your original comment and then your failed attempt at saying it was a joke.  Good try.  Oh and as hard as you’ve tried …….  You just can’t stop yourself from replying to me.  Bahahahhahahahahahhahahahah

Edited by JimmyBT
Posted
5 hours ago, WrestlingRasta said:

If that page could have open minded, objective participants acting in a non-partisan-vindictive manner......that would be a very interesting discussion.

Do you see any chance in hell of that happening here??

Don't forget that I sent sentiments of peace and a peace sign a day ago.

You responded like a jerk (again.)

What part of peace and understanding isn't getting through to you? 

Start 'seriously' acting like you are open minded, objective and non-partisan. That will contribute.

It starts with you.

(Or just keep bitchin' like a jerk. Your choice.)

EHVuS5eVP0=&risl=&pid=ImgRaw&r=0

  • Haha 1
Posted
19 hours ago, mspart said:

Someone should really come up with a pro con page for both.   Just calling them dumb and evil misses the mark every time.   We had 4 years of one and 3 years of the other.   We should be able to objectively judge between the two based on their policy results.

mspart

Thank you BT for starting those pages.   Much appreciated. 

mspart

  • Fire 1
Posted

Can Biden serve as President if he is not capable of defending himself in court?   A weak attempt to steer the conversation back to the subject. 

mspart

  • Fire 1
Posted
40 minutes ago, mspart said:

Can Biden serve as President if he is not capable of defending himself in court?   A weak attempt to steer the conversation back to the subject. 

mspart

A DC court would never convict him and the people directing the country don’t require him to be competent.  Hur only reported what we already knew. 

  • Fire 3

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...