Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hunter did not show up to be deposed. He chose instead to have a press conference. Hunter gives great credence to the statement , how can you tell when a lawyer is lying? His lips are moving.

Posted
1 minute ago, Offthemat said:

Not really a conference - no questions answered, more like a performance. 

Must be nice to be able to afford the most expensive lawyer in Washington DC. I read he charges 5000 dollars per hour. I wonder who is paying for that?

Posted
1 minute ago, Plasmodium said:

He cleared everything up.  His father wasn't involved in his business.  Time to move on.

Yes . He said he innocent and dad loves him . He is good.

  • Fire 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Paul158 said:

Must be nice to be able to afford the most expensive lawyer in Washington DC. I read he charges 5000 dollars per hour. I wonder who is paying for that?

Biden campaign funds?  That works for other people 

Posted
2 hours ago, Plasmodium said:

He cleared everything up.  His father wasn't involved in his business.  Time to move on.

If Trump had said he wasn't involved in Jan 6 in a similar arena, you of course would take that at face value right?

mspart

  • Fire 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
12 minutes ago, mspart said:

If Trump had said he wasn't involved in Jan 6 in a similar arena, you of course would take that at face value right?

mspart

I was going for a chuckle.

  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)

The victim card?  This should be old hat for Trump supporters, he does that in every interview.

Of course he didn't answer questions or be deposed, he's being criminally investigated.  Either he or his lawyer would have to have been the biggest idiots in the world to let him testify.  That's why his previous bluff to testify publicly should have been called by Comer, but he's too dim to have seen the obvious bluff.

And now we can let the legal system hold Hunter Biden accountable for whatever crimes he may be guilty of.

Edited by VakAttack
  • Fire 2
Posted
1 hour ago, headshuck said:

Whoops
 

Wonderful.  And now we can play the game where all the Rs who were fine w/ people defying Congressional subpoenas during the J6 hearings coming in to say Hunter should be prosecuted.  And round and round we go.  Hunter's situation is slightly different given the active criminal investigation, but I'm not sure what the federal rules, especially since it's a Congressional subpoena vs. a criminal subpoena, are on that.  State court he could absolutely be prosecuted for contempt, but typically only after he'd been subpoenaed multiple times in State court and he ignored them; however, again, usually they're not being subpoenaed related to the same things they're being investigated for.  Legally speaking, that part is interesting.

Posted
36 minutes ago, VakAttack said:

Wonderful.  And now we can play the game where all the Rs who were fine w/ people defying Congressional subpoenas during the J6 hearings coming in to say Hunter should be prosecuted.  And round and round we go.  Hunter's situation is slightly different given the active criminal investigation, but I'm not sure what the federal rules, especially since it's a Congressional subpoena vs. a criminal subpoena, are on that.  State court he could absolutely be prosecuted for contempt, but typically only after he'd been subpoenaed multiple times in State court and he ignored them; however, again, usually they're not being subpoenaed related to the same things they're being investigated for.  Legally speaking, that part is interesting.

Is it anything like grand jury testimony where you have no attorney and have to know when to plead the fifth on your own?

  • Fire 1
Posted
43 minutes ago, Offthemat said:

Is it anything like grand jury testimony where you have no attorney and have to know when to plead the fifth on your own?

Typically when I've seen people testify in front of Congress, they can have an attorney with them, but I'm not sure if I've seen the scenario where the person is currently under an active indictment/investigation AND testifying in front of Congress.

Posted
8 minutes ago, Husker_Du said:

seriously, Vak.

i ain't even a lawyer and you're showing your ass here. 

you might as well say you like the left and hate the right. 

In what way, Willie.

Posted
4 minutes ago, VakAttack said:

Typically when I've seen people testify in front of Congress, they can have an attorney with them, but I'm not sure if I've seen the scenario where the person is currently under an active indictment/investigation AND testifying in front of Congress.

Yes, I’ve seen that, I’m asking about the closed door depositions. 

Posted
5 minutes ago, Offthemat said:

Yes, I’ve seen that, I’m asking about the closed door depositions. 

Oh, I'm pretty sure they can have counsel at a closed-door deposition.

Posted
36 minutes ago, Offthemat said:

So, a better deal than a grand jury subpoena?

The witnesses are allowed two attorneys, so a much better deal.  Hunter Biden followed their advice and here we are.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...