Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Along with his plan to re-align and consolidate more power into the "Executive" branch, this is also the most frightening part that I've been warning about with another Inmate # PO1135809 "presidency."

However,  the ONLY thing that will prevent this from happnin is that the GOP HATES weaponized big gubment, so once they learn of this scheme they'll never support Inmate # PO1135809, right,  friends?

https://l.smartnews.com/p-7Y4mQ/4yE4IV

Owner of over two decades of the most dangerous words on the internet!  In fact, during the short life of this forum, me's culture has been cancelled three times on this very site!

Posted

Fantasy is reality, and ...(we all know by now).

Owner of over two decades of the most dangerous words on the internet!  In fact, during the short life of this forum, me's culture has been cancelled three times on this very site!

Posted
2 hours ago, headshuck said:

Haha, fearing a “future weaponized government.”

Trying but failing to find any humor in that comment.

Take a look at Russia or Hamas, not much to laugh about there. Weaponized governments aren't very funny.

Posted

The humor is the unintentional absurdity and irony of someone warning against a behavior that is already happening. (e.g. weaponized DOJ)

  • Fire 5
Posted
6 minutes ago, jross said:

The humor is the unintentional absurdity and irony of someone warning against a behavior that is already happening. (e.g. weaponized DOJ)

You mean the US Supreme Court?

Yes, kind of. It is slanted from previous administrations efforts. But "weaponized?" No. not at all.

Slanted and weaponized are nearly worlds apart in terms of the level of damage they are able to accomplish.

Thankfully, the people of the US know better than to support anything more than the slanted.

 

Posted
1 minute ago, Husker_Du said:

the DOJ and FBI are certainly 'weaponized'. check out the recent ledger. 

Sounds like a knee jerk response without any substance. One of the 'your stupid', 'you're wrong' responses.

If you want to make a rebuttal, at least have some substance, right?

BTW - the "weaponized' crap is common language on MSM. But it doesn't make it correct. It's wrong. If you took a minute to reflect on what a really "weaponized" group could do - you'd see that this isn't that. What we're seeing is 'slanted' and nothing more.

Posted

do i have to spell it out for you, dipshit?

we had this whole convo in another thread. 

hillary did everything but murder people on camera....and nothing

not one human has been charged in anything Epstein Island. do the math on that. 

how much more you want?

it's not my fault you're a lefty douche that can't be honest with themselves. 

 

 

  • Fire 2

TBD

Posted (edited)

How good is an apparent "weaponized DOJ" when you have no goods to use against someone?

Somehow,  this apparent "weaponized DOJ" has found dozens of criminal offenses.  Are you going to believe the DOJ or your own eyes?

Referencing the article,  this goof is simply just out to try to exact revenge for his criminality. 

Edited by Ban Basketball

Owner of over two decades of the most dangerous words on the internet!  In fact, during the short life of this forum, me's culture has been cancelled three times on this very site!

Posted

My goodness.  This Epstein trope is classic MAGA!  It was Trump in office when he died in custody.  It was Trump laughing about how Epstein likes 'em young.  It was Trump pictured and videoed partying with Epstein.  Who is corrupt?  The Clintons!!!

Posted
9 hours ago, jross said:

The humor is the unintentional absurdity and irony of someone warning against a behavior that is already happening. (e.g. weaponized DOJ)

Yes . We are already in the weaponized government ( DOJ,FBI, and the office of President) debacle.

  • Fire 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Plasmodium said:

Bold statement.   Any evidence of this?

SWAT arrest of Paul Manafort, Roger Stone, Mark Houck, the raid on Mar-a-Lago, the murder of Craig Robertson, to name a few examples. Every charge/indictment of Donald Trump.  

Posted
1 minute ago, Offthemat said:

SWAT arrest of Paul Manafort, Roger Stone, Mark Houck, the raid on Mar-a-Lago, the murder of Craig Robertson, to name a few examples. Every charge/indictment of Donald Trump.  

People found guilty by a jury of their peers and then sentenced to prison as evidence of corruption.  A hard, self-evident nope.   Mountains of evidence against Trump.  Also a hard, self-evident nope.

Posted (edited)
7 minutes ago, Offthemat said:

SWAT arrest of Paul Manafort, Roger Stone, Mark Houck, the raid on Mar-a-Lago, the murder of Craig Robertson, to name a few examples. Every charge/indictment of Donald Trump.  

Thanks . Thats a good start. What about the FBI going after parents at school board meetings. 

Edited by Paul158
missed a word
Posted
5 minutes ago, Plasmodium said:

People found guilty by a jury of their peers and then sentenced to prison as evidence of corruption.  A hard, self-evident nope.   Mountains of evidence against Trump.  Also a hard, self-evident nope.

Evidence of blinders, here.  Corruption?  Not even close.  Each one has an example of a dimocrat action or activity that matches but was handled differently. 

Posted
7 minutes ago, Paul158 said:

Thanks . Thats a good start. What about the FBI going after parents at school board meetings. 

That is not a good start.  That is a horrible start!  Insane amount of evidence presented and cross examined against the convicted felons but zero - nothing - presented as evidence of weaponized government.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Offthemat said:

Evidence of blinders, here.  Corruption?  Not even close.  Each one has an example of a dimocrat action or activity that matches but was handled differently. 

Again, nothing presented.  Starting to sound like a broken record!

Posted
11 minutes ago, Plasmodium said:

Again, nothing presented.  Starting to sound like a broken record!

Again, blinders.  What did Manafort do that the Podesta brothers didn’t do?   

Posted
2 minutes ago, Offthemat said:

Again, blinders.  What did Manafort do that the Podesta brothers didn’t do?   

Sell Trump campaign data to the Russians, although tobe fair that was probably legal.  Did Podesta cheat on his taxes?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...