Twitter is better

[Caveira]

29 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

Who threatened lawsuits to take down the Hunter Biden laptop?

Censorship is censorship.  
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-62688532.amp

[jross]

Let's assume Caveira incorrectly claimed that the government threatened a lawsuit to remove the Hunter Biden story. It’s well-documented that the government pressured and collaborated with social media to censor stories like this, and that’s fundamentally wrong.

It's similar to how my company coerced me into getting the COVID vaccine. Did I want to? Absolutely not! But I was directly pressured to do it to keep my job. 

Don’t let semantics blind you to the incredibly wrong behavior of the government.

[1032004]

19 minutes ago, jross said:

Let's assume Caveira incorrectly claimed that the government threatened a lawsuit to remove the Hunter Biden story. It’s well-documented that the government pressured and collaborated with social media to censor stories like this, and that’s fundamentally wrong.

It's similar to how my company coerced me into getting the COVID vaccine. Did I want to? Absolutely not! But I was directly pressured to do it to keep my job. 

Don’t let semantics blind you to the incredibly wrong behavior of the government.

…under both administrations 

[Saylors_Tiny_Willie]

24 minutes ago, jross said:

Let's assume Caveira incorrectly claimed that the government threatened a lawsuit to remove the Hunter Biden story. It’s well-documented that the government pressured and collaborated with social media to censor stories like this, and that’s fundamentally wrong.

It's similar to how my company coerced me into getting the COVID vaccine. Did I want to? Absolutely not! But I was directly pressured to do it to keep my job. 

Don’t let semantics blind you to the incredibly wrong behavior of the government.

"Let's assume the basis is incorrect and then draw strange inferences based on that admission... Checkmate, libs!"

[Caveira]

53 minutes ago, Saylors_Tiny_Willie said:

"Let's assume the basis is incorrect and then draw strange inferences based on that admission... Checkmate, libs!"

Whether I find a lawsuit or not….. there is plenty of enough evidence above the federal gov pressured social media companies to censor the truth.  
 

Splitting hairs over one word or not.  
 

why is it so hard to find this speech on youtube?  It’s Kamala calling for more censorship…. Yet so much easier on twitter and tik tok

https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZTFtCcDUR/

[Saylors_Tiny_Willie]

Keep drinking that sewage, champ.

[Caveira]

2 hours ago, Saylors_Tiny_Willie said:

Keep drinking that sewage, champ.

Censorship is sewage.  

[Saylors_Tiny_Willie]

13 minutes ago, Caveira said:

Censorship is sewage.  

Are you trying to muscle BigBrog off his throne?

[mspart]

Interesting how the blindfolded who can't/won't see what is right if front of them make fun of those who can/will.  The topic of censorship is not even a debate anymore.   It happened, it is happening, and the government and political leaders are promising more if given the chance.   It's all fun and games until you finally find yourself without the freedom to express yourself freely.   And then it is too late.  

mspart

[jross]

 

[Saylors_Tiny_Willie]

Anybody watching Joe Rogan's show probably wasn't undecided.

[Offthemat]

1 hour ago, jross said:

 

I agree.

[jross]

Bless their hearts, Kamala Harris and John Kerry, for openly admitting they want to control what we can say.

They used government power—and my own tax dollars—to push the vaccine on me by threatening my livelihood. They leaned on social media to silence medical experts who questioned their narrative, censoring facts that didn’t align with their agenda. Honestly, I’d gladly pay twice the taxes if it meant they’d back off and stay out of our lives.

A large percentage of the news is biased, pushing an agenda that’s easy to spot—often full of distortions and opinions passed off as facts. Fake outrage is their go-to, but now we finally have the means to fact-check the nonsense. And yes, they're right to see this as a threat to their control over the narrative.

 

 

 

Our first amendment stands as a major block to address disinformation (that we decide what is disinformation)

 

[jross]

Love that https://x.com/realDonaldTrump directly announces his position assignments to the public.

[Offthemat]

24 minutes ago, jross said:

Love that https://x.com/realDonaldTrump directly announces his position assignments to the public.

Same here, and what a terrific selection. 

[jross]

April 2022 (several months before the purchase was finalized)

 

 

[headshuck]

He and Trump should share every Man of the Year award but it’ll probably go a woman.

[mspart]

Men have been beating out women at those for the last couple of years, it would be fitting. 

mspart

[mspart]

42 minutes ago, jross said:

April 2022 (several months before the purchase was finalized)

 

 

Looks like he has reached his goal.  

mspart

[jross]

Hmmm

 

 

[jross]

Hmmm

 

[Wrestleknownothing]

21 minutes ago, jross said:

Hmmm

 

That is great news. Now maybe Fidelity can mark their investment up to down 78%.

[wrestlingguy]

Just now, Wrestleknownothing said:

That is great news. Now maybe Fidelity can mark their investment up to down 78%.

Sounds like the people that say inflation is at 2%. It sounds good but is not accurate.

[Wrestleknownothing]

5 minutes ago, wrestlingguy said:

Sounds like the people that say inflation is at 2%. It sounds good but is not accurate.

Talk about not accurate. This information is very easy to find.

https://techcrunch.com/2024/09/29/fidelity-has-cut-xs-value-by-79-since-musk-purchase/

 

[mspart]

Musk did say at the outset that he didn't care about making money with Twitter.   It was posted just above.   Advertisers are coming back as noted above.   So things are looking good for Twitter (X), but it is worth less yes.   It is privately owned.   So who cares if it is a better place to communicate?

mspart