Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
21 minutes ago, DJT said:

I’d prefer it be nobody who has held any public office… RFK vs Vivek.

I'm good with that, how do we make it happen?

.

Posted
4 minutes ago, ionel said:

I'm good with that, how do we make it happen?

We’ll have to get the outfit and CIA on our side… they’re good at fixing elections.

  • Fire 1
Posted
10 hours ago, ionel said:

I'm good with that, how do we make it happen?

Demand that the MSM isn't allowed to go into cahoots with a political party.

Posted
7 hours ago, Bigbrog said:

Demand that the MSM isn't allowed to go into cahoots with a political party.

That's not even possible.  For that to happen there would have to be no MSM.  They would have to go the way of FloArena.

mspart

 

  • Fire 2
Posted

Can we have the following....PLEASE?!?!?!

Term limits, no bi-party, equal $$ for each candidate, equal airtime for each candidate, can only speak to what their policies would be when doing commercials and on the campaign trail, politicians paid and fired based on performance-based metrics created and revised by the citizens of the US (fired outside of election years)

Posted
15 hours ago, mspart said:

That's not even possible.  For that to happen there would have to be no MSM.  They would have to go the way of FloArena.

mspart

 

Sept 1, we already have the firing squad so ...

.

Posted
2 hours ago, Bigbrog said:

Can we have the following....PLEASE?!?!?!

Term limits, no bi-party, equal $$ for each candidate, equal airtime for each candidate, can only speak to what their policies would be when doing commercials and on the campaign trail, politicians paid and fired based on performance-based metrics created and revised by the citizens of the US (fired outside of election years)

how about a salary cap for each party.

  • Fire 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Offthemat said:

What do you think is going on with Ukraine?

A war that is destabilizing eastern Europe as well as the global food supply, and also threatens NATO involvement and potential nuclear weapons use.

(Which is all, a much bigger deal than the notion that charity money won't be used 100% as it should be. A risk that exists and is true for all charity money.)

Posted
20 minutes ago, GreatWhiteNorth said:

A war that is destabilizing eastern Europe as well as the global food supply, and also threatens NATO involvement and potential nuclear weapons use.

(Which is all, a much bigger deal than the notion that charity money won't be used 100% as it should be. A risk that exists and is true for all charity money.)

Destabilizing the U.S.A. as well.  

Posted
17 minutes ago, Offthemat said:

Destabilizing the U.S.A. as well.  

The USA, as we Americans call it, will be fine.

But if you insist on continuing the conversation... we can go on, there are more. Those f'ing Russians are messing up a whole lot of what this global economy runs on. Smaller countries will hurt, and poor countries are going to suffer. 

The hell of the thing is that the f'ing Russians don't have ANY good reason to do it. NONE. ZERO. Aside from stealing Ukranians stuff, of course. Which isn't a GOOD reason, it's an evil one.

Posted
13 hours ago, Scouts Honor said:

it was said that the war wasn't hurting the USA

No, no, that was not what was said. 

Offthemat is a dopey poster trying to cause trouble with no basis. Political troll. (Maybe worse.)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...