Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Going into the 2015 tournament Edinboro was expected to score about 34 placement and advancement points based on their seeds. They actually scored 60.5 (75.5 with bonus added in).

Their projected finish was 14th based on their seeds. Their actual finish was 3rd.

And they did it with only 6 wrestlers.

My detailed data only goes back to 2010. Was there a more overachieving team prior to 2010?

  • Fire 4

Drowning in data, but thirsting for knowledge

Posted
17 minutes ago, Wrestleknownothing said:

Was there a more overachieving team prior to 2010?

Yes, the '97 Hawkeyes who were projected to place 2nd at the tourney and went on to score a record 170 points

I Don't Agree With What I Posted

Posted
6 minutes ago, jchapman said:

Or a more underachieving regular season team?

I don't know. They had three returning AA's who finished 4th, 3rd, 4th in 2014. Those three came in seeded 9th, 2nd, 3rd. So one lower, two higher.

Drowning in data, but thirsting for knowledge

Posted

2015 Edinboro - 133 Schopp and 184 Avery deserve most of the overachieving credit. Schopp was 9 seed placed 3rd after losing first match. Pinned 4 on backside. Avery 13 seed placed 3rd. 

  • Fire 1
Posted
19 minutes ago, PortaJohn said:

Yes, the '97 Hawkeyes who were projected to place 2nd at the tourney and went on to score a record 170 points

Back of envelope, the 1997 Hawkeyes went in as 10.5 point dogs, and won by 56.5. 

A 67 point swing. Yowza.

Drowning in data, but thirsting for knowledge

Posted
4 hours ago, 1032004 said:

what about Oklahoma the same year with Brewer winning the title as a 13 seed?

Perhaps for individual over achievement, but Oklahoma finished 18th with 29.5. 

Brewer scored 25, the other 4 wrestlers scored 4.5.

Drowning in data, but thirsting for knowledge

Posted
10 hours ago, Wrestleknownothing said:

Perhaps for individual over achievement, but Oklahoma finished 18th with 29.5. 

Brewer scored 25, the other 4 wrestlers scored 4.5.

And what was their team projection based on seed?

Posted
19 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

And what was their team projection based on seed?

Projected at 29th based on seeds. Moved up to 18th. I still think 14th to 3rd is more impressive.

Drowning in data, but thirsting for knowledge

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...