1032004 Posted May 14 Posted May 14 31 minutes ago, gimpeltf said: Thomas Matthew Crooks was a registered Republican in Pennsylvania, but his political leanings were contradictory and unclear to investigators. While registered as a Republican, he also made a $15 donation to a progressive group in 2021, and officials have not established a clear political motive for the attack. [1, 2, 3, 4] Voter Registration: State records show Crooks was a registered Republican who registered to vote in September 2021 and voted in the 2022 midterm elections. Donation History: On January 20, 2021, at age 17, he donated $15 to the Progressive Turnout Project through the ActBlue Democratic donation platform. This donation was made on the day of President Biden's inauguration. Investigation Findings: The FBI has not found evidence of strong partisan views, and his search history included both Republican and Democratic figures. Diverse Views: Some acquaintances described him as having conservative views, and in a high school mock debate, he stood on the conservative side, though others noted he did not show overt political passion. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6] He was most certainly a republican when he was calling for violence repeatedly against numerous democrat politicians. It’s possible he wasn’t later, in my opinion it is more likely he still was, but just didn’t like Trump. Let’s think critically here. If he was successful in killing Trump, that would have essentially guaranteed victory for the new republican candidate in 2024.
Caveira Posted May 14 Posted May 14 1 hour ago, 1032004 said: He was most certainly a republican when he was calling for violence repeatedly against numerous democrat politicians. It’s possible he wasn’t later, in my opinion it is more likely he still was, but just didn’t like Trump. Let’s think critically here. If he was successful in killing Trump, that would have essentially guaranteed victory for the new republican candidate in 2024. Calling for or actually doing violence ? When he did violence he was a leftist
1032004 Posted May 14 Posted May 14 4 minutes ago, Caveira said: Calling for or actually doing violence ? When he did violence he was a leftist You don’t know that
Scouts Honor Posted May 14 Author Posted May 14 49 minutes ago, 1032004 said: You don’t know that but you KNOW otherwise right?
1032004 Posted May 14 Posted May 14 1 minute ago, Scouts Honor said: but you KNOW otherwise right? No
Lipdrag Posted May 14 Posted May 14 On 5/13/2026 at 12:57 PM, Caveira said: This guy sounds familiar; everything Hitler did as chancellor was legal when he did it. First they came for . . . People who tolerate me on a daily basis . . . they are the real heroes.
El Luchador Posted May 18 Posted May 18 On 5/14/2026 at 6:26 AM, 1032004 said: He was most certainly a republican when he was calling for violence repeatedly against numerous democrat politicians. It’s possible he wasn’t later, in my opinion it is more likely he still was, but just didn’t like Trump. Let’s think critically here. If he was successful in killing Trump, that would have essentially guaranteed victory for the new republican candidate in 2024. Leftists love to vote in the opposition primary. They literally openly promote it.
red viking Posted May 18 Posted May 18 (edited) 10 minutes ago, El Luchador said: Leftists love to vote in the opposition primary. They literally openly promote it. Need to get dirty like the Republicanshave for years. I say we need to go full throttle attack mode. Anything goes as long as its technically legal. Get your attorneys to look for loopholes like Trump did. Dirtier the better. Get these winger SOBs. Edited May 18 by red viking Fighting the Good Fight Against Non-Stop Winger Lies and Hypocrisy
Scouts Honor Posted May 18 Author Posted May 18 this is RV getting a beat down and not learning his lesson
Scouts Honor Posted May 18 Author Posted May 18 6 minutes ago, red viking said: Need to get dirty like the Republicanshave for years. I say we need to go full throttle attack mode. Anything goes as long as its technically legal. Get your attorneys to look for loopholes like Trump did. Dirtier the better. Get these winger SOBs. technically legal is that anything like the 'break glass' option in cali? gerrymandering? changing laws so dems can vote in gop primaries? packing the courts? widespread fraud of govt programs?
Caveira Posted May 18 Posted May 18 I bring you the party of peace. What’s up with these crazies? I’m saying f*** Brian Thompson. I don’t give a flying f*** he died,” says Ashley Rojas, wearing her press badge provided by @NYCMayorsOffice. Lena Weissbrot adds that Thompson’s teenage sons “are better off without him” and should “enjoy the blood money.
Offthemat Posted May 18 Posted May 18 1 hour ago, Caveira said: I bring you the party of peace. What’s up with these crazies? I’m saying f*** Brian Thompson. I don’t give a flying f*** he died,” says Ashley Rojas, wearing her press badge provided by @NYCMayorsOffice. Lena Weissbrot adds that Thompson’s teenage sons “are better off without him” and should “enjoy the blood money. Despicable
El Luchador Posted May 18 Posted May 18 5 hours ago, red viking said: Need to get dirty like the Republicanshave for years. I say we need to go full throttle attack mode. Anything goes as long as its technically legal. Get your attorneys to look for loopholes like Trump did. Dirtier the better. Get these winger SOBs. So in other words you want to keep up the status quo of the left. 1
ionel Posted May 19 Posted May 19 2 hours ago, Caveira said: I bring you the party of peace. What’s up with these crazies? I’m saying f*** Brian Thompson. I don’t give a flying f*** he died,” says Ashley Rojas, wearing her press badge provided by @NYCMayorsOffice. Lena Weissbrot adds that Thompson’s teenage sons “are better off without him” and should “enjoy the blood money. Is Mangione getting support because: a) they think he is innocent, b) they are sure he is guilty but support murder or c) they think he is cute and don't care whether a or b? .
red viking Posted May 19 Posted May 19 1 hour ago, El Luchador said: So in other words you want to keep up the status quo of the left. It wasn't even close to what's going on right now. Vengeance is coming soon though. Mid terms and then the next prez election. Fighting the Good Fight Against Non-Stop Winger Lies and Hypocrisy
El Luchador Posted May 19 Posted May 19 2 hours ago, red viking said: It wasn't even close to what's going on right now. Vengeance is coming soon though. Mid terms and then the next prez election. Trump stood up to the bullies. You like your bullies.
Bigbrog Posted May 19 Posted May 19 20 hours ago, red viking said: It wasn't even close to what's going on right now. Vengeance is coming soon though. Mid terms and then the next prez election. This is an actual honest question...do you happen to be on the spectrum?? Absolutely nothing wrong with it if you are but it would explain a lot of how you post and I personally would be a little more understanding of the things you post repeatedly. 1
Caveira Posted May 26 Posted May 26 (edited) 10 minutes ago, vsnej said: rightists... You won’t be able to keep up tit for tat as there is exponentially more examples of leftists violently rioting vs the right. The Right is up 9-1 now Edited May 26 by Caveira
vsnej Posted May 26 Posted May 26 18 hours ago, Caveira said: You won’t be able to keep up tit for tat as there is exponentially more examples of leftists violently rioting vs the right. The Right is up 9-1 now the point is the slush fund
Jackson Lininger Northern York, Pennsylvania Class of 2027 Committed to Slippery Rock Projected Weight: 149
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now