All Activity

Agree

I remember him well, fast as lightning and could go upper body or attack the legs. I follow IL HS wrestling somewhat, and using the clues of a state and Fargo champ with a career cut short due to injury, Brill was my guess...

Minnow can't help but step on his own d*ck. Does a great job of breaking the news, then follows it up with this clown show.

Actually it was both. Just edited to show the xtweet

Not on there either. Please share if possible.

Honest mistake...

similar situation to Hamiti. I believe Dean was 21 at NCAA's this year.

Is this on twitter? If so, please share for those of us not on there.

Exactly. It's almost as Hamas won a tightly contested election with a minority of votes and then promptly dissolved the democratic apparatus so they could never lose power.... Your guys' worldview is so contradictory. You don't even realize it most of the time. You correctly understand that Hamas is a brutal military terrorist group that runs Gaza under a military dictatorship, but then can't understand why the Gazans don't simply vote them out. Maybe if you stopped for two seconds to actually think instead of regurgitating propaganda and cliches, you'd see these very obvious flaws in your arguments. Just like @Interviewed_at_Weehawken, who, without realizing it, perfectly laid out why Israel's current military strategy is doomed to failure because it plays right into Hamas' source of power. You guys are capable of understanding this stuff if you think for yourselves. Well, at least *some* of you...

Depends. Does she respond with things like "QV" and "BB"?

Koll was absolutely correct.

It looks like she might be a cop in the area. When they say “partner,” do they mean like police partner?

The two most popular sets of headlines now begin with "Trump annouces..." and "Trump backtracks...".

How is it cops are the same as hamas again????

Ah gotcha, sorry. So he did also point out that the author of the school newspaper article is also the one that wrote the article about Rob Koll saying there were a lot of good looking girls on campus. So she may have some sort of grudge…

Oops... Minnow. Sorry I was unclear. I was also referring to a post of mine above where I predicted Mineo's next step.

Rumor on the street was, Koll was not excited about having him, but big donors wanted him and pony'd up the cash.

AJ himself? Recently?

I'm not going to attach here, but he has started going after the young woman who is quoted in the article. Posted her political affiliation... which is just typical stupidity by him. His sycophants are encouraging him to pile on.

https://jonathanturley.org/2025/05/29/liberation-day-meets-deliberation-day-court-strikes-down-trump-tariffs-in-the-midst-of-trade-negotiations/ On Wednesday, President Donald Trump’s “Liberation Day” collided with deliberation day in the courts, and it did not go well. The Court of International Trade ruled that the President lacks the authority to impose his massive tariffs worldwide. But all is not lost for Trump’s tariffs. The three-judge panel held that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act of 1977 (IEEPA) does not give the president “such unbounded authority.” While some have criticized the court as a “judicial coup,” it is a well-reasoned and good-faith decision from judges appointed by Presidents Ronald Reagan, Barack Obama, and Trump. While the court, in my view, should have issued a stay pending appeal, a wide array of experts have questioned the authority under the IEEPA, which is designed to address a national emergency. The authority does not mention tariffs and has never been used for tariffs. There’s a good chance the Supreme Court upholds the ruling. The Trump administration is now appealing and pushing for a stay to prevent this ruling from having a disruptive impact on the nearly completed array of trade deals. Rejecting Trump’s authority under IEEPA does not mean he lacks all authority for tariffs. The administration is correct in arguing that Congress has repeatedly deferred to presidents on tariffs, granting them sweeping authority. For example, the ruling does not affect Trump’s “sector tariffs” under the Trade Expansion Act, which impose 25% levies on steel, aluminum, and auto imports. Likewise, the court acknowledged that Trump has the authority under Section 122 of the Trade Act to impose tariffs of up to 15% for 150 days to address “fundamental international payment problems,” including trade deficits. After conducting further investigation into these problems, he can then impose long-term tariffs under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962. Interestingly, Turley is not the Trump apologist some of you on here think. He writes based on facts on data available. He says the court's decision is well reasoned and in good faith. The court did not say Trump can't levy tariffs as he writes. As noted, they said he could. Just not in the way he did most of them. See bolded and underlined section. mspart

Gobbling gerb isn't for everyone particularly if you're 60 lbs. overweight.

Has ever? There was one vote. mspart

Ray Brinzer on the old chat board suggested something similar. Go back a few years and go to those spending levels and current revenues meet those expenditures. I thought that was a brilliant move and have suggested it from time to time. mspart

I agree. But the coverage of the possibility and the discussion will be endless. Plus the Minnow out there throwing his usual teenage girl tantrum on AJ's behalf.