All Activity

You seek the indictment...and then put your "evidence" out there for all to see versus "if I do as much mental gymnastics as I can I'll convince myself he is guilty and then tell everyone about my delusion". What is so funny about this is if there was evidence on Trump and he indeed was a pedo, EVERYONE on these boards would yell lock him up!! Everyone on these boards have called for the DOJ to release the files! But what most, thankfully, aren't doing is using blind partisan hate to do flips and turns in their head to convince themselves someone is guilty when there is zero evidence other than the flips and turns in their head. Produce just ONE piece of evidence that would hold up in court that Trump is guilty...this shouldn't' be that hard to do given you are absolutely adamant he is.

Deakin vs AOC - two 157 lb college hammers separated by a couple of years. Both guys are still coaching and presumably scrapping regularly with the college guys. Amine vs Keck - See where Parker stacks up on the world stage with a proven guy like Amine Suriano vs Gross - Two previous 133 lbs natty champs. We have not seen Nicky in awhile and gross matches are always highly entertaining Zain vs Yianni - Always close and controversial Woods vs Alirez - I thought Alirez was set to step up and be the next guy at 65kg when he beat Haji Aliyev. If he is healthy, I think he will be back in the mix. Glory vs Vito - big points every time they wrestle Monday vs Nolf - Monday has improved drastically in freestyle and Nolf showed vulnerabilities (likely due to not training for wrestling specially) Sloan vs Warner - I am a Jackrabbit fan and would like to see Sloan strap it up again. Remember when Sloan teched Warner years ago? I believe that is the only time they have ever met up.

FBI update.

I certainly implied he would, though i think it was fairly obvious i was just making the topic because Nickal obviously lives on social media.

Stereotypes are tropes seldom rooted in truth based on your own internal bias. Fixed it for you

They are most certainly enforcing the law, doing what 77 million people voted for. Why do you have such a desire to protect rapists, murderers, and thieves?

What unlawfuls are doing isn’t either.

John Smith is still better than Burroughs

Either way skippy it’s not happening.

The evidence is there if anyone ever had balls to seek the indictment

Would 007 consider this guy political? There’s “circumstantial evidence” that Anibal Hernandez Santana, 64, had “a political motive behind” the shooting, Sacramento county district attorney Thien Ho said. “There are some indications here that the motive behind the shooting of the ABC news station was political in kind,” Ho remarked.

Probably even lower.

I said they are continuously detaining us citizens not deport might wanna improve your reading skills

The problem with drawing conclusions is that your crayons are inadmissible in court.

It’s literally law and order. It’s illegal to be here illegally. Every one of them is a financial burden on taxpayers and some of them are violent criminals.

Easy conclusion to draw. That would be your argument in court? Hmmm !!!

What ice is doing isn't law and order.

It's just a temporary bump. Once a few weeks go by the ratings will plummet into the abyss. "AGAIN"

Law and order looks authoritarian to criminals.

On target

What does this sentence mean? DUDE IS STILL GONNA BE A PROBLEM THOUGH. Thanks

Plenty of eyewitness accounts from victims. Either you believe victims or you don't. Taken with the totality of his very close associations with Epstein and Maxwell, coupled with his Access Hollywood interview, it is an easy conclusion to draw.

Yeah because no one has had success being a lighter, faster heavy

...