All Activity

It is disingenuous to say that his remark is in response to following the Constitution. It is obviously directed toward the question of what level of due process is required.

As a side note, Lamer isn't in the portal - he signed with Oregon State.

Happy to see Horwath again.

Compare and contrast your comment to let’s say. Sanctuary cities.

Javani Majoor from Arizona State to DII Adams State Seth Larson from Campbell to Central Michigan

I know but eric bischoff was a pro wrestling magnate.

When the back and forth continued, and the host asked, “Don’t you need to uphold the Constitution of the United States as president?” Trump responded, “I don’t know. I have to respond by saying, again, I have brilliant lawyers that work for me, and they are going to obviously follow what the Supreme Court said. What you said is not what I heard the Supreme Court said. They have a different interpretation.” That is exactly what he said. I bolded the relevant part of his answer.

But not illegal. But not illegal …. And sir ms13 still isn’t coming back.

If Alvarez actually gets another year, I will choose him. But otherwise Hipolito and Stewart are good guesses. ------ Gianni Silvestri from Clarion to Buffalo

An “accident,” literally by definition, is “something wrong.”

Clerical accidents aren’t the same as legally doing something wrong. Either way an illegal alien was deported. Nothing to see here

Multiple people within the administration admitted they did. Even Bondi

Dang. My fingers are crossed they will map out where the money went and claw it back. I wish I had invested in paper shredding companies prior to DOGE.

Saw this story today https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2025/05/02/7-year-old-driver-sister-utah-mcdonalds/83407475007/

Maybe try out the wtt. If you’re the best 86 kg dude in the world he should breeze through the field.

…..

Prob worth $250k now.

who created expedited removal? The one and only sir bill ‘the cigar king’ Clinton….. Yes, there is legal precedent for using expedited removal — which limits due process — and it has been used by presidents from both parties over the past 50 years. So, in that context, Trump (or any president) can legally continue or expand this practice, within the boundaries of immigration law and Supreme Court rulings. Key points: Expedited removal was created in 1996 under President Bill Clinton through the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act (IIRIRA). It allowed for fast-track deportations of certain undocumented immigrants without a full hearing. Presidents Bush, Obama, Trump, and Biden have all used expedited removal to varying degrees. Trump greatly expanded its scope in 2019 to include undocumented people found anywhere in the U.S. who couldn't prove they had been in the country for at least two years. The Supreme Court upheld the legality of limited due process in expedited removals in DHS v. Thuraissigiam (2020) — ruling that non-citizens without lawful status and caught soon after entry have limited constitutional protections.

wondering why there were no judicial decisions when obama was doing this seems like a precedent

A friend of mines son (13 years old) was caught doing online bidding for cars. It was an older Mustang. I think he was up to 12,000 dollars when he got caught. His older brother turned him in. This was 20 years ago.

i already answered your statement

That's not what precedent is

the GOVT does what it wants... that's precedent except when bad orange man does it