All Activity

Pretty Picture Time Speaking of moving around weights, here are two ways to visualize the movement of returning points between weights. First a Chord Diagram. The color of the chord represents the previous weight. The destination weights are listed within the colored sections. The numbers around the outside are the point totals (also represented by the width of the chords).

I know, I know. I already did a returning points thread. But now there is more. This time I am including redshirts. For a returning redshirt I used the points (and weight) scored the last time they wrestled. More data = more fun. So here we go. Returning AA's Lets zig a bit before we zag. This one is about career honors rather than last year's points. 133 returns the most total AA honors with 15 from 12 wrestlers. 197 has the most AA's per wrestler with at least one career AA (1.8). 141 has both quality and quantity with 8 wrestlers who have earned an average of 1.75 AA's per. No weight has more than one returning champ, but 141 is also home to the only 2 time champ in Ohio State's Jesse Mendez. Only 184 and 197 do not have a returning champ. Note: AA honors may have been earned at a different weight than the 2026 weight listed for the wrestler on wrestlestat. Top Ten Teams Returning Points Hopefully this one is not to tough to read. I attempted to capture both transfers and returning redshirts (and the combination of the two) in a single chart. For example, Oklahoma State: Has three returning scorers from last year's team (orange), And 1 returning from redshirt (black). They also picked up an Iowa State transfer who redshirted last year, And an Arizona State transfer who did not. Note: These totals do not reflect any lineup decisions. For example, PSU has 8 returning scorers of varying vintages, but some of them may not start while being replaced by a wrestler with no tournament scoring history.

She’s running in a ruby red state legislative district, is on the same ticket at the state house incumbents, is the daughter of a current congressman who is running for governor, there’s most likely no way she will lose with all those factors behind her

If you're gonna lie about Flo's (of all people) predictions I'm sure you're willing lie about your own.

Pretty weak defense, especially after the E Jean Carroll case. Ongoing conspiracies extend the timeframe to the most recent activity. All to be decided by a court. The reluctance of the Legacy Media to cover the information that’s been released will only further erode the little confidence they have left. So much is being exposed, especially about Hiliary and Ukraine, and how much the Russians were aware of the corruption, while the Legacy Media played their role in hiding the truth and advancing the hoax.

I would bet money she doesn't come close in AZ.

Also that she's a conspiracy theorist and her father is a traitorous scumbag.

The outrage. Sydney Sweeney is getting more press. I mean as a dictator on day 1… who was literally going to end democracy. Who exactly does he answer to? He could just delete the whole thing and replace it with a McDonalds happy meal menu if he wanted right?

They were restored this morning after outrage.

And USA Today, Fox, the hill, the New York post, the guardian, prolly your fav brietbart news. To name a few news orgs that have articles out in the last few days.

Ya. Trump tried to digitally erase the constitution lol. Y’all are sometimes whack. Ever hear of this site? It tracks changes on almost a trillion different web sites… I work in tech sales my customers notice a contract change almost immediately. “They” noticed lol Whatever https://web.archive.org looks like there were 68 changes to that page you posted above this year… and 548 changes since 2019.

It’s still a bunch of nobodies on TikTok, and even less than the Sweeney thing

Translation: "Oops, they noticed."

https://www.msn.com/en-us/tv/news/opinion-colbert-s-late-show-wasn-t-canceled-it-was-euthanized/ar-AA1K1q6H?ocid=hpmsn&cvid=b43dbe6ef7d54f30b963af7ca03e7096&ei=24 just like stern. Isn’t worth the money

I understand. I don’t know if going “viral” = popular, and not trying to be argumentative just trying to see how ‘popular’ it is. Just seems like a silly thing for people to get in a tizzy about. But it seems to be one of those loud minority type things more so than being a popular theory. Oh well, to each their own.

I mean it’s gone viral. https://trending.knowyourmeme.com/editorials/guides/what-is-the-septum-ring-theory-the-alleged-secret-meaning-of-having-a-septum-piercing-explained

Define “popular” in relation to the theory? It appears the piercing is much more popular than the theory. As for me, someone wants a nose ring…..so, who cares?

But but but they don’t care about it

I have not heard of any yet.

Is it fair? More importantly is it accurate? Here is a video for those that are not familiar with this popular theory.

MN Rodent- any word on who the gophers visited?

truzz- from your lips to god's ears.

First blue jeans now Dunkin donuts hired someone to sound like a Nazi? USA Today compares it to Sweeney https://www.usatoday.com/story/entertainment/celebrities/2025/07/31/dunkin-ad-gavin-casalegno-genetics/85464941007/

Not just back. Was a coding error. Trump didn’t have a hand in this. I think Trump is asking @uncle bernard for a formal apology. Or so I’m told Library of Congress blames "coding error" for missing sections of online Constitution The Library of Congress on Wednesday pointed to an unspecified "coding error" that led to key parts of the U.S. Constitution being deleted from the Constitution Annotated website. Why it matters: The missing sections included foundational provisions, such as the right to habeas corpus — which protects people from unlawful detention — and the foreign emoluments clause. Those constitutional principles have risen to the forefront of political and legal debate amid the president's immigration crackdown and foreign dealings. As of Wednesday around 2p.m. ET, the text had been restored. Driving the news: As highlightedby tech news site TechCrunch, an archived version of the website shows that a chunk of Article I Section 8 was cut, in addition to the entirety of Sections 9 and 10 of Article I. According to captures from the Wayback Machine, those sections were present as recently as mid-July. What they're saying: "It has been brought to our attention that some sections of Article 1 are missing from the Constitution Annotated ...website," the Library of Congress said in a statement posted to social media. "We've learned that this is due to a coding error." A banner across the top of the site read, "The Constitution Annotated website is currently experiencing data issues. We are working to resolve this issue and regret the inconvenience." Links for certain provisions included in those sections, such as Section 9's text on ex post facto laws, directed to an error page that read "Page Not Found" with a portrait of George Washington. That page has since been restored. The Library of Congress did not immediately respond to Axios' request for further information.

2018 Had three competitors who have been on multiple olympic & world teams, and two are medalists. From a folk perspective, it had four NCAA past/future champs. That's about as tough as it gets. ETA: Cruz lost in the bronze match at the 2024 olympics. Could have been three olympic medalists.