All Activity

I am not super surprised with Cenzo's movement, but I can't think of any other recent big names that moved around so much so quickly. I knew it was a thing in football. Just look up any number of NFL or D1 head coaches and watch how they went from a position coach at a D3 all the way up the ladder through the years.

I think that is par for the course in college coaching and, particularly for those just starting their careers. It is probably also the surest way to move from an admin type job to an actual coaching job for many. I saw a crazy stat a few months ago that in the past 4 years 2,163 on-field college football coaches have changed jobs. https://www.cbssports.com/college-football/news/from-top-to-bottom-college-football-has-never-seen-more-coaching-changes-study-shows-unprecedented-turnover/

Man. I thought they would strip all freedom and liberty from the residents. Crazy turn of events.

Bowser now says DC is safer with the Trump rush. mspart

I like Marcus in Freestyle Stanich in folk right now in that matchup. I think Stanich is one of the few guys that can handfight with Marcus and I am not sure that marcus's snap to far ankle/drag to far ankle/go behind series works super well against Stanich and I give Stanich a slight edge on the mat right now. I think Marcus could push him out a few times in free though. All of this is factoring in size, once Marcus grows into a full 141 or 65kg I think Marcus wins.

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/muriel-bowser-trump-dc-takeover_n_68af528ce4b0bbcc3f8daa71 https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/watch-dc-mayor-bowser-gives-update-on-federal-takeover-of-law-enforcement-in-the-district https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/dc-mayor-bowser-reverses-course-110003292.html?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAANKiaaHtRlPxVqyLgKtXnvVXRjUcSi8kd_SoKyGNOg-Tk56t3fJAFBAMsxKAw8PPndm1x5dXvGQtA-MzasPn3zSPVWwpxkqA8g5WE3fiL_odLAd-W4oK9IijYOW9Kfcipj_PETOpWtP-PP6jm3T7adUGbk3P4FrqfjFJTQzeaXdO Washington, D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser initially expressed fear of President Donald Trump’s plan to crack down on crime in the nation’s capital, but its clear success made her change her mind. After Trump announced his plans to deploy National Guard troops and assume oversight of the Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) to tackle rising crime in Washington, D.C., Bowser warned such a crackdown would be "unsettling and unprecedented." However, the mayor admitted at a press conference on Wednesday that the federal surge has made a noticeable impact on one of America's most famously dangerous cities. At the briefing, Bowser displayed a chart crediting the influx of FBI, DEA, ATF, U.S. Park Police and Capitol Police with bolstering MPD’s efforts and declared, "We greatly appreciate the surge of officers that enhance what MPD has been able to do in this city." She pointed to one dramatic example, saying, "For carjackings, the difference between this period, this 20-day period of this federal surge and last year represents an 87% reduction in carjackings in Washington, D.C. We know that when carjackings go down, when use of gun goes down, when homicide or robbery go down, neighborhoods feel safer and are safer. So, this surge has been important to us for that reason." Bowser offered further examples of Trump’s new surge driving results. "This is what we think in just a couple of weeks of experience has worked," she said. "Having more federal law enforcement officers on the street — we think having more stops that got to illegal guns has helped. We think that there is more accountability in the system, or at least perceived accountability in the system, that is driving down illegal behavior. We know that we have had fewer gun crimes, fewer homicides, and we have experienced an extreme reduction in carjackings." This is quite remarkable. Bowser then complained about tactics to get here but that rings quite hollow. She couldn't completely give Trump a win, had to complain a little bit so she could keep her bona fides with the Dems. I'm guessing this will be the major part of what is covered by the media in general. mspart

I think Blaze and Forrest both have by american terms very good Par terre. Forrest also has his slide bide series from an upper body perspective and his firemans, blaze has a very good drag to a go behind. There is never a lock to win gold at the olympics, I think Dake in 2024 is a prime example of that. However, I think there is a real possibility come 2028 Blaze,Forrest,Stanich,Mendez,Bassett are all ranked top 20 in the world and if you win a bracket with 5 world ranked guys assuming nobody comes forward that is absolutely dominating 65 (which we have not seen in about 20 years) I think its fair to call that person a gold favorite. Now I am definitely baking in projection with all of those guys but they are all 22 or younger and none of them wrestle free full time yet so I think it is fair to do so.

I understand it, and based on how you worded the question, I'm confident I understand it better than you. But then again, the wording is all part of the game.... I'm just laughing at you having some concern over answering a question. Good lunchtime fun!

If Blaze got big enough that he was a true 141, sure, but he's wrestling 61kg and 133 if he goes for Penn State this year. Mendez is a 2x NCAA champ for a reason. It's kind of wild that he was giving up most of 10lbs to Bassett, Hardy and Mendez and beat two of the three up at 65kg.

Defining the Energetic Executive Hamilton’s concept of an “energetic executive” refers to a governmental branch capable of swift, decisive action. “Energy” signifies the capacity for prompt execution of laws and responses to national challenges. The “executive” denotes a single, unified head of government. Hamilton’s arguments for this concept are primarily found in Federalist No. 70, where he outlines attributes necessary for a strong executive. https://legalclarity.org/what-does-hamilton-mean-by-energetic-executive/

He's also been RTC coach, I think.

I think it was Koll for a year or two at Stanford, but 2021 would have been the only year that covid altered anything.

It's a big promotion to go from recruiting coordinator to assistant coach.

He's still in his 20's plus has gotten insight on two other great wrestling minds (Koll & Zeke). I like it and can see Cenzo sticking around. Although on the opposite side of the state it will be similar to his WPIAL roots. It's a good fit

Weren't two with Koll? And some of this was during covid when a lot of things changed. It's not unusual for someone to roam around for the first few years. How many stayed at their first job out of school that long?

I missed the Arizona State stint entirely.

I didn’t for see you having these issues with being able to read what I have actually said, and decipher from what I have not said. My “stance” is in the first paragraph you just quoted.

I was merely asking what your stance is given that you wrote about believing in facts and talked about losing liberties...I don't believe asking for clarification is reading into things you wrote as I truly was trying not to do that by asking questions. And yeah...my bad as you responded right before I hit send...again, I was/am just asking questions.

LOL...what do the data and facts say to you when they speak for themselves? Where did I say that I based my opinion on only what "people believe"?? I'll stand by my stance that DC wasn't a safe place....what is your stance again?

That same data shows since 2012 ish they are 2-3x higher murder rates

the part where you agreed you shouldn't have tried to make the connection about losing liberties to what has/is happening in DC. Where did I agree to this specifically? I’m getting the feeling you’re reading things I did not write Patience young sky walker, I do have to tend to some things as well. I replied to this. And, ironically, it relates to you apparently reading things I didn’t write.

Graduated 2020. Has it been Stanford, Arizona State, UNC, and now Lehigh in six years?

Yep...I don't disagree...with the concept overall...and yep, I apologize for missing the part where you agreed you shouldn't have tried to make the connection about losing liberties to what has/is happening in DC. How about all those data and facts that made you conclude that DC is and has been a safe city??

Well, first I never said “DC is a safe place”, unless you can point to something I’m missing. I linked to The data, that shows that for the last two years crime is trending down, even after the presidents major cuts to funding to combat crime, and at the time the President decided to put military in the streets of American cities. The disagree to disagree is that I say the data and facts speak for themselves, where as you say no because “people believe” I hope that clears it up for you.

You're the only one beating anything in here