All Activity

She went to Princeton and Harvard. What is this privilege you talk about.

My point is they are a burden financially on cities like Chicago. This is a blatant fact. You can’t argue that

Wasn't this in the list of words you guys aren't supposed to use any more?

Michelle Obama just trying to stay relevant. You made a lot of money parlaying your husband being the president into book deals and crap, do us all a favor and fade into the background and enjoy all your money like the rest of the former first ladies.

Pivot! your claim was challenged. You can’t back it up. I just watched the video. Nothing like what you claimed was said. So you lied. Your ‘common sense’ which, can we agree means: ‘how I put things together’, was wrong. You want something to be true so you twisted something into a pretzel to make it seem like it if I just ‘trusted you, bruh’. what do you do next? change the subject. Move the goal posts. DARVO! or just admit you were mistaken or lied and become smarter in your process. why is this so difficult? Don’t you want to be smarter? Isn’t that a goal of yours?

The weird thing about this story is it literally wasn't picked up by ANY media outside of The Daily Collegian. Super odd if it were a legit story.

The weird thing about this story is it literally wasn't picked up by ANY media outside of The Daily Collegian. Super odd if it were a legit story.

Not sure this year is "the year" in terms of winning, but I do think they are finally on the right track. Going to be up and down, but I think Caleb's going to look like the number 1 pick by the end of the year and I think Ben Johnson is the real deal.

Define irony: a group of anonymous people who undoubtedly had more privilege than this women had up to a point in her life(although they’d never admit it or even self reflect on that point), now complain and attempt to shame her that after working hard and getting quite lucky in her life she voices any issues that she had in the WH. nope, you’re not emotional snowflakes. Definitely not.

You believe Chicago is spending $0 on illegals? Whats your stance here. It’s been well defined and in the news for years. Your challenging the validity of that ?

I'm not sure how much you have watched Zepeda wrestle. . .when Zepeda is in shape and motivated, he is capable of beating anyone in this age group. I look at this as a quality win for Stanich, regardless of the score.

What are you going to ask him..."Have you seen all Syd Bartlett's XXX rated only fans?" "Did you really need to see the size of her vajayjay?" "Is she really that big of a skank?".

That's the thing about 65 - it is widely considered the toughest bracket annually, has the most consistent turnover on domestic teams due to athlete peak on an annual basis, and because the margins are so tight due to high-level talent each year you could wrestle the bracket ten times and have at least 4 different champions and 20 different medalists. Parity example: 2021 Yianni got rocked by Tevanyan who proceeded to lose next round to someone who lost next round, both went home without repechage; in 2022 Yianni beat Tevanyan round 1 and went on to silver while Tevanyan lost R2 repechage; 2023 Yianni didn't even make the US team and Tevanyan went on to win bronze. Turnover example: From 2021-2023 there were 101 participants at 65kg worlds/olympics): 61 wrestlers represented their country one time during that span, 22 made their national team twice, and 18 made their national team three times; none made it all 4 times (recognizing that there was disparity at 21 worlds since it was a mickey mouse tourney immediately following Tokyo olympics) Exactly two wrestlers had multiple medals across those four tourneys: Musukaev and Bajrang. The point is 65 is so tight that it's a crapshoot at best.

That quote doesn’t confirm the numbers you sited. If you watched the speech/presser, site the time stamp where those numbers were mentioned?

Right out of this dudes mouth - we are financially at the point of no return

Whose tax plan did that to you?

No one sited you as privileged or called you names. Just that someone that uses those terms could be seen as such. If you’re taking offense to a hypothetical then you’re admitting you might fall within it. I made no claim as such. Read more carefully and leave your emotions out of it. Yes. Certain terms were in fact ‘definitions’. Appealing to the legality is lazy. It IS dehumanizing calling someone an alien. is there a reason you want to continue to see these particular humans as ‘less than’? Because insisting on outdated terminology has a history and not a good one. Not unlike the pro-nouns debacle of the early 20’s. It comes off like a child putting their fingers in their ears and screaming ‘I DON’T WANNA!’ You just look sad and out of touch.

My taxes have gone up 3 times in the last 3 years. Yes.

It's a free country ... we can be unhappy if we want!

Reposting a lie over and over doesn’t make it true. when you post the source of the different numbers you’ve sited then I’ll take it more seriously.

Did you confirm that this number is accurate?

He doesn't think he owes an answer to all the guys on all the message boards (or reporters for that matter)

Obviously those protesters were paid by the right. So they can’t be trusted to actually represent chicagoians. So there’s no reason to believe anything about this story. Frustrating isn’t it? DARVO cannot ever build anything of substance. It can only destroy. who do we know of that has not and boasted that they will never take accountability for anything? (Hint, 45-47) Anyone that supports or follows a hollow person like that is in a cult. I hope that doesn’t describe you.

You guys must have missed his press conference. It started with' "I know I owe an answer to that one guy on that one message board, so here goes...."

My guess is that we reached that point. Cael is a lot like vintage Bill Bellichick in that regard.