WrestlingRasta

Woman giving Johnson crap about the process saying Congress just wants to stay on vacation (which I don't doubt) BUT, he's not lying here. It is a matter of process, they come in the first few days to help with the immediate needs, then they let the state and local do their thing, then they come back in to assist with assessments and reimbursements. It is all part of the process of these things (including the $750 everyone is sensationalizing for political purposes. I got $750 quickly when my house was badly damaged in Ian 2022, I got $750 with Irma when I lost almost everything in 2017. the 750 is not Kamala, just like this timing and process in not Johnson and congress. There are processes, and compartmentalization, to these things.

hmmmmm

Where is this documented. I’ve heard the rumors but haven’t seen about anything documented.

Love German Shepherds, have had a few. Great dogs.

pups

I would imagine their expectation is not at all a total ban, but you start there at the negotiating table and work back to what you're comfortable with. It appears they agreed on tentative deal for wages, $4 raise every year the next six years, and are going back to work tomorrow. Haven't seen anything regarding the pension plan and automation.

There are definitely people saying that. Scanned through and definitely a lot of your typical weirdos. Didn't see any politician, or even media outlets for that matter, making that claim, but definitely a lot of the other weirdos.

I call your attention to the highlighted portions. First, the one I wrote, and second the time stamp....seven hours ago.

So does that mean you are clear, or you’re still confused?

Well, the context of our conversation, which you referenced in your initial post here, was politicians lying. I asked you to direct me to where people claimed Trump said it, I didn’t say no one said it, I said I hadn’t seen that and asked you to direct me to where you read people claiming that was Trumps statement, you chose not to. In fact you’re still choosing not to. Ross came in with people on Twitter projecting.

Ahhhhh. People on Twitter. Well, I’m glad we got that worked out.

The offer also had some level of protections with the automation, although I don’t recall those details.

Can you point me in the direction of where you read the claims that Trump made that statement? I’m trying to stay on topic here.

That’s valid.

You are not very good at comprehending, and simply sticking with, what someone is saying. Let me try to clear it up for you one last time. I am not commenting on whether or not the bill is good. I am not commenting on whether or not Trump killed the bill. I did not state, that Trump killed the bill. I am stating that Republican senators came out and said he killed the bill. is that clear? Conversations go a lot better when you stick with what the person is actually saying, instead of trying to formulate something else.

I don't know this, I have not read all of the bill, have you? My statement was not whether the bill was good or not. My statement was in response to why they are saying Trump killed the bill. To which, I wondered, if it has anything to do with all of the republican congressmen who have come out and said he jumped on the phone and effectively killed the bill. My response was no more, or no less than that, and it is entirely accurate.

Woops. That didn’t take long. Tiny might want to take a look within.

Correct. But I haven’t seen any report making the claim that was a Trump statement. Where are you seeing claims that was a Trump statement and not the staffer in Detroit?

I’m on their side as far as all of the AI taking human jobs. I’m not on their side of 62% pay raise over the next six years. 5% a year is a much more likable number. And I agree with you it could lead to more automation.

Not sure who is making that claim, but they are close. The filing, and the multiple reports I have read on the filing, claim that a campaign staffer in Detroit made that statement, as a response to being told that people are getting a little edgy at the counting center.

I don't think it is the IOC as much as it is the USOC and NBC deals. When we hold olympic trials, USAWrestling has to operate, in the relative aspects, the same as if it were the Olympic Games, because the trials are part of the olympic process. I believe of anyone this would fall on NBC.

Can you explain?

Yes, he was voted in through an election victory in 2020. He was going to run again, but it became blatantly obvious that he should not, so he is not. There is another old, incoherent, babbling convicted criminal who is blatantly obvious should not be running again, but the other side is too busy licking balls. It would be good for the other side to see the light, get rid of the guy so conservatives can start winning more elections again, and conservative policy can start getting on the board again. I wish republicans would start looking more inward instead of this odd obsession with 'owning the libs'. Anyone who knows anything about performance knows that one of the major keys to success is focusing within, on what you can control. But.....those balls must be pretty tasty. And while Republicans are getting their licks in, Democrats are winning elections and getting liberal policy through...... But hey, keep up the good work. It's proven mighty successful......right?

Democrats did the right thing and got a guy who has no business being in the white house off the ballot. But on the other side......still wiping their chins with every incoherent dribble that comes out.