Caveira

I thought you are not allowed to say they are not normal. Biggot.

I thought if government officials surrounding the president & family members commit a bunch of crimes during your presidency and in the past….. on your behalf…… you’ll just get pardoned.

He is yet another wrestler at Penn state who got a degree in Parks, Recreation and Leisure Studies That can’t be all that hard. Seems like a good % of the team majors in that. Wonder why?

It was @GV4444 page 14 link here

I wasn’t. Someone earlier was defending Carter’s hazing behavior and that was one of his examples. It’s somewhere back in this or one of the other Carter related threads.

From the league on Fx?

There is a guy in this thread somewhere. (I’m paraphrasing). Common man. I was pizzed on by some big dude against my will. It’s no big deal 20 ish years later and we are now friends. Suck it up buddy.

he did express support for the 2020 Minneapolis protests, including the destruction of some local businesses, as a legitimate outlet for racial justice, which drew criticism. Key clarifications: His Support for Minneapolis unrest in 2020 On May 30, 2020, Mamdani wrote on X (formerly Twitter): “While politicians & pundits condemn the uprising in Minneapolis … those at the center of it … understand why it’s happening. And why it has to happen. Black + brown solidarity will overcome white supremacy.” He described the riots—which included burning and looting—as “necessary” and grounded in solidarity. He defended violence broadly as a response to systemic injustice. He is a bad guy.

That may have been me too. For the record.

Perhaps they peeked. I mean that appears to be LEO protocol too. This is fun. Anything else they did right ? Please add comments. maybe there is a reason the news edited down the vid to only show the door breech and the big bad menacing vehicle. News programs never have an agenda or an axe to grind. Before conducting a dynamic entry, it's standard police/SWAT protocol to gather intelligence and assess the interior layout—including whether children, vulnerable people, or dangerous animals are inside—before breaching any doors or windows. 1. Pre-entry intelligence gathering Before executing, teams conduct surveillance and drive-by checks to identify signs—like children's toys or vehicles—indicating kids or vulnerable individuals may be presentpolice1.com+14dallaspolice.net+14swatmag.com+14. They interview neighbors, family members, or informants to confirm who is inside and whether anyone especially vulnerable (children, elderly, pets) needs special consideration . If intelligence suggests minors are present, many departments avoid dynamic entries altogether, opting for slower, safer methods dallaspolice.net. 2. Visual and audio room assessment (“peek”) Tactical entry teams often use “peek” or visual sweep methods before entry—opening a crack or using mirrors/cameras to scan the interior reddit.com+14andrearatulowski.com+14police1.com+14. They listen for voices, movement, or signs of children or innocents, and may call out “Police! Anyone inside!” to prompt occupants to reveal themselves . 3. Confirming safe entry point Once occupancy is confirmed, officers still decide whether to enter through a door or window depending on tactical factors: structure layout, presence of booby traps, line of sight, or potential for surprise . The protocol emphasizes clearing from safe positions first—using stealth, limited penetration, or breach-and-hold—rather than rushing in blindly

It’s apparently a tactic police use too. So there is that. It’s called dynamic entry and it’s for LEOs safety. When law enforcement breaches both a door and a window during an apprehension, they’re usually executing a "dynamic entry"—a coordinated tactic designed to gain swift, safe control of the environment. Here’s why multiple entry points are used: 1. Minimizing Risk in the "Fatal Funnel" The door is the obvious entry point—but it's also a danger zone, sometimes called a "fatal funnel," where officers are most vulnerable to armed suspects anambcn.org+4thefreelibrary.com+4keyt.com+4. Breaching through a window simultaneously helps divide the suspect’s attention, reducing the risk that everyone will be shot at the door. 2. Surprise + Speed = Safety Law enforcement teams often used flashbangs, door rams, window tools, or even ballistic shotguns to breach simultaneously through more than one opening. This surprised the suspect, preventing them from preparing or destroying evidence . Multiple entry points allow better tactical coverage—officers from different directions securing different rooms quickly . 3. Gear + Tactics SWAT and tactical teams are trained in hydraulic, mechanical, ballistic, or even explosive breaching tools to enter through doors or windows efficiently

The infants were not even in the room according to the video. And according to the mother. They were in their bedroom with her with the door closed. was she screaming hysterically that glass went all over her kids. I promise you she would have been had that happened.

In the video it stated. The kids were sleeping in the room with their mother with the door closed so yes. You assume they didn’t peek in the window before breaking it? It takes some time to set the door charge. Super safe for the kids yes

They’re safe. And common for law enforcement to use. Literally used across the country. Try not impeding Leo’s investigation you won’t be crying on the channel 9 news. again. They impeded federal life investigation by ramming their car into law enforcement’s vehicle. do you want them to just politely ask to turn yourself in like in the movies ?

Hope this passes. Your tax dollars should not pay for radical riot organizers

Apologies then boss that’s why I asked. I don’t think this poster says everyone “should” juice but he thinks juicing should be legal etc etc and no one should care. its prolly in that old long kasak thread when Shapiro accused psu of doping after NCAAs

lol. Classic exaggeration did you even watch your own video? the news dude said quote. Shattered the window. The lady / girlfriend said quote “they shattered the window first” then blew the door. you can even see a device similar to what I posted being placed on the door.

I only saw the door. Post a pic that’s a long azz vid They said the window was broken. prolly one of these. Safe for those inside. https://ebad.com/products/breacher-strip/

Ok I changed it to human. Still need a suggestion. After ramming police car how should they apprehend him. Ask nicely? those are specific to break down doors. They aren’t dangerous for those inside. The news is just being emotional as usual. so they “unintentionally” impeded an ice investigation by ramming them on accident. Sure.

After a human tried to kill the police. Can you suggest a nicer way to enter his home to arrest him? do they ram down doors for crack dealers that may or may not have children inside?

Ok thanks. There is one person on this board that often says that it’s fine if everyone takes steroids in sports.

Sort of serious question. Are you the one who thinks peds / steroids etc should be legal in sports ?

F Hamas

Cause it’s a story written by his pr team and they prolly had to link it to something that really happened. Guessing he had pneumonia and they can document that …. And Wiola. I was just trying to feel better. Toats not cheating.

If it’s guaranteed to have a total loss of the property in n years because science. It’s guaranteed to be part of the ocean. Why am I giving anyone any $ insurance , banking , anyone….