The immigration from Cuba doesn't paint Cuban communism in a worse light than immigration from elsewhere and different socio-economic systems, including capitalist ones.
Cuba is no paradise. Communism there should have had its reforms long ago. However, the question was intended to point out how bad it was under Batista and the fact that there are systems much worse than Cuban communism. The average Cuban was less free under Batista than they are 50+ years after the revolution. The revolution didn't happen in a vacuum.
Most of the ones I know bought Teslas. They like to be early adopters of technology and they like the power. It is the former more than anything. I haven't bought a car in a long time, but I'm considering a Ford Lightning when my number comes up in a few years.
I'm not a communist sympathizer but I can objectively spot a communist society. Further, I can understand the appeal and practicality that socialism or communism holds for the masses of an absolutely corrupt society, such as the one in Batista's Cuba.
You didn't answer the question. The question seeks to determine whether life was diminished under communism for the average Cuban, not the wealthy. Immigration numbers fifty years add nothing meaningful.
I didn't say Cuba and DRK are or aren't communist. I implied Cuba is when I asked jross a question. I haven't given it much thought. Fun fact: Expected life span is Cuba is longer than that of the US.
Not answering the question/answering a question with a question, which is understandable when you don't fancy the answer to the original question.
Most of the first immigrants were the ruling class, which had nothing to do with the average person and in fact were the cause of the revolution. The rest of the immigrants are consistent with immigration numbers from Latin America or even less, which is independent of economic or ideological philosophy.