Word, but you're moving the goal posts re my argument with Caviar(?). We were arguing about whether "they" would continue to push "their narrative." Caviar said "they" would; I said the NYT had already changed it.
Whether the NYT f*ed over America by backing and continuing to back Biden in the face of mounting evidence that he's incompetent, I can't disagree. But, then again, I don't read the NYT everyday, or the Bulwark, or the Nation, or the New Republic, or any other anti-Trump outlet. However, I think I can empathize with their situation: They backed the only dude -- and it had to be a dude ... an old dude ... and an old white dude --- who could beat that lunatic. (What? You wanted them to endorse Kamala Harris so that she could get eaten alive by the racist-misogynist set?) So they did. But, the Faustian bargain played out like Faustian bargains are wont to do.
So, it looks like that lunatic is going do what he does, and the Peter Thiels of the world are gonna laugh, laugh, laugh ... though, frankly, I don't think Peter Thiel laughs.