Offthemat

You are going to sit back, relax, and stimulate until you are personally affected? Let me tell you about this frog. He’s in a pan of cool water, but there’s a fire under the pan.

Trump, nor us conservatives, want to preserve the issue. We want Biden to shut the border down now, he doesn’t need a new law to do that. Biden and the dims want amnesty. Otherwise, they’d shut the border down to improve their electoral prospects. Listen to them. What they say, what they don’t answer, what they dance around. You are one of the main ones here that needs to “stop and think.” I just hope you hire out your detective work.

Trump plans to enact Eisenhower’s “Operation Wetback” on steroids.

He’s a very confused fellow. He says I’m basing my opinion on what people are claiming. Well, yeah, what the negotiators Synema and Lankford have said, and how they said it.

Lankford is not very conservative, his votes roil me more often than not. Biden campaigned saying he’d cease deportations for at least the first hundred days, conveying the message that he would be more open to illegals crossing and staying. He then ended “Remain in Mexico” and took the other 63 steps in Ohio Elite’s post of Johnson’s speech. Trump battled all the dims and half the Republicans, led by Ryan and O’Connell, and fueled by the hiliary collusion hoax. The bill Lankford is ‘negotiating’ brushes out to solve the illegal immigration problem the same way dims always try to solve it: just make the illegals legal. Problem solved. Yesterday, Mr. Johnson utilized dimocrat votes to add another ~1.5Trillion to the debt by expanding welfare to illegals. The economist Thomas Sowell warns us of a point of no return. He also likes to say that it doesn’t matter how smart or educated you are if you don’t stop and think.

How about the size of the workforce employed by the government?

All you need now is someone with a fat billfold to hire you a lawyer.

If a woodchuck could, a woodchuck would, chuck as much wood as a woodchuck could.

That’s par for the course. Leftists have been shown to be the least charitable, believing that that’s the duty of the government. Then they vigorously avoid paying taxes.

They’re Cherokee.

No thanks.

If you want the puerile, anemic opinion of a naive, childless, unemployed incel, there’s probably no better place.

Your comparison of Tucker to Maddow is errant. Tucker asks questions and let’s you hear the guest’s answers. You are so triggered by him that you can’t handle it. It’s TDS, just a different T.

Maybe if you throw it again, because it still didn’t fly. Doing the same thing over and over again expecting a different outcome, and all.

Did you put this here because you’re running out of room for all the things you’re wrong about?

Some of my family has been fighting illegal immigration since 1492.

Taibbi has described himself as a liberal and claims to have never voted Republican. He just doesn’t have TDS.

The old model was to take gov’t funding to allow the FBI to control the moderation. Which is probably better for the bottom line.

The Pentagon on Monday identified the three Army soldiers who were killed in a suicide drone attack in Jordan over the weekend. All three soldiers served in the Army Reserve, according to the Pentagon, and were assigned to Georgia’s Fort Moore. The soldiers are: Sgt. William Jerome Rivers, 46, of Carrollton, Ga.; Spc. Kennedy Ladon Sanders, 24, of Waycross, Ga.; and Spc. Breonna Alexsondria Moffett, 23, of Savannah, Ga. https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/pentagon-names-troops-killed-in-jordan-drone-attack/ar-BB1hrMXB

Don’t look Rasta:

But I don’t benefit as much as these ‘health’ providers.

Who benefits from transforming someone with a dysfunctional brain into someone with a dysfunctional brain and a dysfunctional reproductive system?

https://nypost.com/2024/01/27/news/trump-to-use-judges-conflict-in-83-3m-jury-verdict/

The one with the same last name as the judge: Kaplan. No relation. Attacking the messenger on a detail that can be established as factual or not is weak. That this is now proven to be true, are you going to look to Travis for information in the future? Even if the relationship should prove to be inconsequential, do you believe the non-disclosure is appropriate?

And on that note: