flyingcement

Kaleb Burgess over Joe Zargo

I really couldn't tell. I though he was shaking his arm in a strange way - as if to try and shake off pain - but then the way he went down, seemed to be awkward regarding his legs. and then he tapped the mat when he went down. really not sure

Figueroa did not look right from the start and ends up injury defaulting in his first match

What about Tanelli? He's done well with limited options at Columbia - has history with the team. Similar haircut to Bono to the point where you could probably just keep the same headshot up on the website

I'm such an enabler for posting that lol

#1 Richard Figueroa (Arizona State) #2 Cooper Flynn (Virginia Tech) #3 Eric Barnett (Wisconsin) #4 Jett Strickenberger (West Virginia) #5 Max Gallagher (Penn) #1 Sam Latona (Virginia Tech) #2 Michael Colaiocco (Penn) #3 Dylan Ragusin (Michigan) #4 Dylan Shawver (Rutgers) #5 Julian Chlebove (Arizona State) #1 CJ Composto (Penn) #2 Jordan Titus (West Virginia) #3 Danny Pucino (Illinois) #4 Jack Gioffre (Virginia) #5 Dylan Layton (Cleveland State) #1 Kyle Parco (Arizona State) #2 Kannon Webster (Illinois) #3 Corbyn Munson (Central Michigan) #4 Joseph Zargo (Wisconsin) #5 Quinn Kinner (Rider) #1 Jacori Teemer (Arizona State) #2 Chase Saldate (Michigan State) #3 Trevor Chumbley (Northwestern) #4 Andy Clark (Rutgers) #5 Joseph Roberts (Illinois) #1 Dean Hamiti (Wisconsin) #2 Caleb Fish (Michigan State) #3 Peyton Hall (West Virginia) #4 Maxx Mayfield (Northwestern) #5 Rafael Hipolito (Virginia Tech) #1 Edmond Ruth (Illinois) #2 Justin McCoy (Virginia) #3 Adam Kemp (Cal Poly) #4 Nick Incontrera (Penn) #5 Alex Cramer (Central Michigan) #1 Layne Malczewski (Michigan State) #2 Brian Soldano (Rutgers) #3 James Conway (Franklin & Marshall) #4 Dennis Robin (West Virginia) #5 Tony Negron (Arizona State) #1 Michael Beard (Lehigh) #2 Luke Stout (Princeton) #3 Cameron Caffey (Michigan State WC) #4 Andy Smith (Virginia Tech) #5 Martin Cosgrove (Penn) #1 Luke Luffman (Illinois) #2 Issac Trumble (NC State) #3 Michael Wolfgram (West Virginia) #4 Matthew Cover (Princeton) #5 Trevor Tinker (Cal Poly)

alright I was mostly giving you guys a hard time but wanted to say my piece. they've actually already changed seeds on several weight classes this evening so it's probably a good thing I waited. I'll post it up in a moment

brother I don't care about X as a matter of principle - I view it purely as a matter of utility. It is a very common place for news to be shared. I might think the most common. I follow as many wrestling sources as I can find (combined with other interests like economics, regional food items, as well as lost cities). It's pretty wild. You can follow whatever you want, but for me its a news aggregator among my core interests

Come one man - I can help you sign up

I'm not sure if changing screen names is even possible, but it would be great stakes for the next big wager: loser changes their screen name to X Donkey

no?

If it's not out of a reasonable principle, then since its free, easy to sign up, and readily accessible, I think I'm doing the right thing by you in encouraging you to sign up rather than providing the fish itself

In other words, I'm not your tweet donkey - but if you have a good reason like Elon Musk tried to kill your brother, then I'm totally on your side

haha I have it all copied and pasted ready to post, but that reason isn't good enough to press submit. I don't like to let people off the hook for the intended sacrifices they intended on making if it was out of principle - you know - in order to help support them in their mission

Can you tell me why you don't have X? And I would be happy to post if you give me the reason

I'm not sure what the consensus will be, but I would expect Brooks to defeat AJ Ferrari 7 or 8 times out of ten. If they only face two or three times, Brooks could easily sweep the series. Primarily because I think Ferrari hasn't shown enough high level offense to compete with someone like Brooks.

I was kicking around on Excel and trying to think of a solution for the problem of too many subscriptions. Because of the natural limitations of fewer people that know about or care about wrestling, this solution would not be extremely profitable (and that's not really its design). It would also need software development in the initial capital outlay to design the interface with each feed, as well as ongoing support (probably absorbing any possible profit). It's designed to help streamline. But I wonder if customers could essentially get away with paying closer to $50 a month for access to all wrestling channels instead of the current 64.29 that they pay. Simplification + small savings for the customers. Each channel in the model below is accepting a lower fee from the platform for subscriptions, provided that it can guarantee 500 new users. This is completely back of envelope but just something I was thinking about when I had too much coffee

Yes that is the annual rate - which I find to be among the best deals in college wrestling over the last several years. I don't know if they offer a monthly rate, but worth looking into for someone who didn't want the full season

Poor, sweet VMI

It's been talked about like its nearly set in stone, so the post about him doing a campus visit - rather than being listed on the official roster - seemed like confusing news.

Curious to see if Hamiti remains at 174 for the tournament or drops back down to usual

The U.S. agriculture sector extends beyond the farm business to include a range of farm-related industries. Agriculture, food, and related industries contributed 5.4 percent to U.S. gross domestic product and provided 10.4 percent of U.S. employment; Americans' expenditures on food amount to 12.8 percent of household budgets, on average. Among Federal Government outlays on farm and food programs, nutrition assistance far outpaces other programs. https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/ag-and-food-statistics-charting-the-essentials/ag-and-food-sectors-and-the-economy/#:~:text=Agriculture%2C food%2C and related industries contributed roughly %241.264 trillion to,0.7 percent of U.S. GDP.

Okay I think it's 5.4%

Agriculture is a relatively smaller share of the overall picture anyway - representing about 5% of our economy and 10% of our workforce.