nhs67

Those rumblings have been going on for like three years. From me.

Has (had) a connection with Deakin there...

Is this our Hawkeye VV?

Stanford job just opened up.

Don't tell Minnow.

When I say prominent ACs I don't mean current Stanford. I mean like a Terry Brands or a Casey Cunningham or a David Bolyard take the job?

Who, if anybody, from Stanford follows Koll to UNC this season? Is it too late to do so? Can they transfer after school has already started? Who transfers OUT of UNC? Who is the next guy up at Stanford? Do they bring Borelli back? Does he even want to go back? Do one of the more prominent ACs make that next step? Would someone young like Vincenzo or Deakin surthrive there?

I mean... it isn't my school. All I am saying is that Smith has still been considerably more successful the last eight years still even with the damn Focus drama clouding the program. Also, I am sure we can agree that Koll is a homerun hire.

I don't understand this claimed 'downard trajectory' that is stated basically everywhere by a lot of people. In the same time that Scott was at UNC (which, to be clear - I HAVE BEEN A FAN OF!), Scott went a total of 75W - 49L to finish with a 60.4% winning percentage (winning). He went 23W - 17L to fellow ACC schools, which is a 57.5% (winning) winning percentage. In that same time Smith has gone 105W - 16L to finish with a 86.8% winning percentage (also winning). To take that further, he went 13W - 1L against ACC schools (including 2W - 0L against North Carolina proper) for an even better 92.9% winning percentage. There have been 'bad' things about the program, but the results are still considerably positive. He had what I would consider is ONE down year in the 13W - 4L campaign that was directly after the Focus drama. This last year they still went 14W - 3L on the season. I don't see anybody calling for Brian Smith's head at Mizzou. He has less wins and more losses than John Smith at Oklahoma State in that same time span and that is with having SIX of those seasons being in the MAC (90W - 17L for those who are curious... 84.1% winning percentage). The trajectory is up. Had this focus crap happened to any other program, save for Penn State and Iowa, it might have been much much worse.

They actually won't be irrelevant insofar as duals go. Especially towards the end of the season. If the Brands bros listen to me they could get very creative with their lineup and come away with ten NQs.

He is going to take over for Sanderson in ten years while David Taylor becomes head coach at Iowa State for a season after he competes at the 2032 Olympic games at 95 KG (weight classes get changed between now and then).

For those who are also 'up in arms' about Smith stepping away from OSU soon because he can't handle it... Koll is the same age. Actually graduated the same year from College and I don't expect Koll to hang it up any time soon.

Guys. Don't tell Minnow. Unless Iowa does exactly as I say with their lineup... Rutgers could beat them in a dual. Regardless of what weight Ayala and Teske end up going (125/133), Rutgers could conceivably win both of those. Iowa is winning 141 with Woods. Could be a major. 6-4 Rutgers. I think VV is better than Butler... but he decked Pantaleo. He could deck VV as well. 12-4 Rutgers. Franek will get a decision at 157. 12-7 at the break in flavor of Rutgers. 165 is Caliendo is going to bonus White. White is just coming up from 149. 12-11 174 - Turley could beat Swafford. 15-11 Soldano could pin whomever they throw at 184. 21-11 Poznanski via Dec. 24-11 Slav over Hill 27-11 They could fckn do it. Will they listen to me? 125 Teske and 133 Ayala matches up against Rutgers better (styles). VV could win. Kennedy comes back at 165 and also bonus victories, puts Iowa at 20-0 after 165. Swafford destroys Turley due to his bromance with Kennedy and the momentum. 24-0. Caliendo methodically picks apart Soldano and wins via Maj. 28-0. Franklin beats Poz. 31-0. Steveson comes in and techfalls Slav. 36-0. They need to listen to me. Also, don't tell Minnow.

Fake news.

This never happened.

The Bassett one confused me, too.

My only guess as to why he is not included is because of the recent uncertainty of what weight he will be going. Also, might he take an Oly-shirt?

Ah yeah. Okay. I think I am going to lose this one in any case. I do wish him well, though.

Oh, I know. I have sent kids to his camp, though, and seen better results from them than other 'better' camps. It's marketing in a world driven by consumerism. If people believe it he will sell more. Aye yeah I do remember that. That was a shame. All these are annoying, I just don't see why he should be shat on for getting a jump on even the spammers.

So a guy who got a jump on the 'camp system' we have going on rampantly now in the states gets shit on for doing it before everyone else? Self promotion and wanting to win should not be frowned upon. Going outside of the lines in regards to rules, regulations, and stipulations should be. He has a great mind for coaching, but I worry he will run in to what he did at Queens and rather than being a CEO/Coach bound to one school he will try to be a 'professor of the sport' and forget the boundaries given to him by a book.

Where are you seeing this?

Did he not already come out and say that wasn't in the works?

Oh, that is a good one, as well. UNLESS! Thompson is going 174?