1032004
-
Posts
6,585 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
10
Content Type
Forums
Articles
Teams
College Commitments
Rankings
Authors
Jobs
Store
Everything posted by 1032004
-
Yes Ersland also sat him against Minnesota earlier. Flynn had taken him to SV the last time they wrestled
-
Lol they have no shot to win. But I kinda think they should pull the shirt if they don’t want to get worse than 2nd again. They could have a chance to win in 3 or 4 years though I suppose depending on what other recruits they can get to follow Bo.
-
Thanks for sharing this. I guess Arnold is back on x after temporarily deleting his account after the PSU dual…
-
Correct, but I thought we were talking about Iowa
-
Has anyone that was supplanted by a transfer actually been a legit AA threat? The closest I can think of is probably Glazier and he has not done well this season
-
He walked him out of bounds with a leg in the air. Correct call
-
I wouldn’t rule out either Sakamoto or Rhodes from being the starter…
-
I don’t think he goes into the portal based on anything from this season. But maybe he does if he can’t get back down to 174
-
Not an Iowa fan, but I bet they seriously consider using him if he beats Plott
-
-
Started at 157 where Taylor beat Blaze 4-1 with a TD with 10 seconds left. Heavyweight match actually had a bunch of action. 125 on now. “Load management” for Ramos
- 1 reply
-
- 1
-
.png)
-
Lol well you are free to imagine whatever you want. So are you saying you think most DOGE employees had previous experience reading government contracts?
-
Who said anything about age? I asked if they had read any of the contracts they are now cancelling prior to being hired. That’s more about the fields they worked in previously than their age.
-
Not gonna lie this is a weird list. 1. Of these 10, Alex Jones should probably be #1. 2. Tucker and RFK probably don’t deserve to be on the list IMO. They tend to be very careful with their words as to not come out and say things that are misinformation, they just strongly imply them or in the case of Tucker, “just ask questions”
-
I don’t think it is. I don’t need to have read any contracts to point out that any cited “savings” should not include what’s already been paid. A more relevant question is how many contracts had most DOGE employees read with their own eyes prior to being hired?
-
So kinda like the move Knox did had different leg position than a spladle… BTW I agree a high-crotch is different. But you can’t say a high crotch is different but what Knox did was “just a variation”…
-
Not sure why that would be relevant to claiming the entire length of the contract was “saved” when it was only a small portion
-
Gone thanks to the Biden administration. You cared enough to bring it up…
-
Answer to your first question is yes. But it seems more of the errors found were basically the opposite of your example. Like this one that claimed $1b in “savings” but 80% of it had already been spent. Don’t know the answer to your last 2 questions
-
Now that’s a headgear toss
-
I’d assume so. But surely far less than the profit they made on the sale. Hopefully DOGE isn’t taking credit for something in relation to this.
-
You know at least one of the “not tossups” is going to go the way we don’t expect though right?
-
2025 Big Boarders Remaining
1032004 replied to Indiana-Hawk-Wrestling-Fan's topic in High School Wrestling
-
Ok so it’s a variation of a single leg
-
Uh, not if it’s sold. “Deferred maintenance” means they didn’t actually pay to do the maintenance, and since they (the Biden admin actually) sold it now that deferred maintenance is the new owner’s problem.
