Nailbender

Lol, the newest version would have Harvey Weinstein and all of his cronies to add into the mix. It's all pointless drivel to make people feel like one side is pure and the other evil. Dinner with Mike comment although hilarious, I wouldn't bother asking him.

I'm interested to know if you're out because you read some of the list or because your explanation didn't help me understand? If you can bother to read further, I'll explain. I was trying to point out that the maga hat wearing morons that got Trump elected, make these same lists, only of Democrats. Listing the political affiliation of dog catchers and county commissioners does zero to prove "who the real pedophiles are" which is a stupid topic for an opinion piece in the first place. These lists are a simpletons way of justifying the side they already picked politically, nothing more. My point was closer to yours than you might realize by my previous post.

My grandmother paid me $1/inch to cut the rat tail off. She was a wise and generous woman.

It doesn't. The list was stupid. I'd read it before defending it.

After a dismal performance at NCAA's by the Cowboys a crying John Smith is interviewed to announce that he "loves this team, so much" and he has signed a new 20 year contract.

That is the exact same thing that happened to me.

I get it. I'm not complaining or unappreciative. There isn't really a right answer. The chart is still very interesting. 100% was just a curious metric to me. It removes from the conversation a guy who got 100% minus one match and replaces him with guys who have multiple career losses or guys who most people wouldn't even mention as in contention to be the best of all time. I should've only mentioned it if I could give you a better metric.

I'd agree that it would be pretty difficult to be the greatest of all time with a loss but eliminating those athletes from the conversation all together doesn't seem right. Dan Gable had one and only one loss, so he doesn't even make the list of the greatest of all time? Doesn't seem right.

That makes sense for a conversation about 100%ers. Does it still work for the thread title? That was more my question.

I'm not sure I know enough to rank them. This kind of thing is only a recent interest of mine. I would say that I'd be just as interested to see where the two Gables would fit the list as I would SL and Yanni, maybe more so since they're careers are finished. I'm sure drawing the line is the rub.

Why the interest in only 100%ers? You leave some pretty unbelievable all time talent in this sport off your list right off the get go but include 2 that haven't even finished up yet. I do still appreciate it and it is interesting, just not sure what this really shows?

Good luck with that.

Choosing to carry a firearm anywhere is a serious decision, let alone in a school. I'm glad the superintendent decided (or someone decided for them) that this person was no longer the person for that job. I'd go a step further and question if there shouldn't be further consequences. I agree with you, leaving a gun in the bathroom is not the same as dropping your wallet or losing your cell phone. That said, according to the Gun Violence Archive (not anywhere near a right wing group) there have been 152 defensive shootings since January when this incident happened. I won't see any articles posted about those.

The superintendent's mistake is inexcusable.

I thought these short, smart ass comments were how you liked to communicate. I guess that only works for you when you do it.

You asked for the attention.

Huh. Pretty sure I haven't ever said a kind word about the man. You must be one of those smart people I've heard so much about.

You sure have a lot of opinions about him. I wonder if he still thinks of you as the one who got away?

Man...you're even more hip than I thought. Was he mean to you?

Sure looked like Witcraft got burned to me? I see (and like) what you did there.

I'm not sure I expressed any. You don't like Elon Musk. You're trendy and hip, I get it. For mostly the same reasons @jrossstated, I was surprised of the use of that article as evidence that others should take up your quest to make Twitter great again?

What on earth caused you to want to read all of that and brag about it?

I am still and have always been incredibly average. Always winning more than some, never as much as others.

https://www.cnn.com/2023/02/16/politics/illinois-balloon-group-alaska-missing/index.html