uncle bernard

Wait until you hear what the Israeli public thinks about killing Palestinians. Keep advocating for the slaughter of civilians and one day it might come back to bite you. Empire always comes home.

Because they don't want to help Israel ethnically cleanse Palestine. Half the current population of Gaza wasn't even alive when this vote took place, but you think they should be killed or ethnically cleansed because a minority of Gazans voted for Hamas 20 years ago. You better hope your moral code is never applied to you.

Thank you for showing that what I said was correct. Most Gazans voted against Hamas the only time they were able to vote.

A minority of people voted for Hamas 15 years ago. That's it.

You are literally arguing that viewpoints you don't agree with should not be allowed in classrooms. Is that not exactly what a "safe space" is?

I cited the reputable sources cited in Wikipedia. Actually, it is. Israel empowered Hamas to undercut the legitimacy of the Palestinian peace process led by the PLO. This is what has allowed them to expand illegal settlements and continue to kill massive numbers of civilians. This board is a perfect representation of this concept. When anybody thinks about Palestine, they think 'Hamas.' If you say anything in defense of Palestinians, they call you a terrorist supporter and Hamas lover. This entire thread is dedicated to that very thing! I haven't said a single positive thing about Hamas on here, yet people call me a terrorist. That is the usefulness of Hamas for Israel. Hamas delegitimizes Palestinian struggle in the West because many people in the West are too stupid to distinguish between Hamas and Palestine or know the history of the Palestinian struggle. If Israel were to wipe out Hamas tomorrow, they would need to invent a new Hamas. Next, it will be the PA, then if they take all of Palestine, they will use Hezbollah as a reason to start annexing Lebanon.

They can and should. They just shouldn't kill tens of thousands of civilians to do it.

The "it's wikipedia!" thing is a lazy, outdated retort. It's the sign of a stupid person. Wikipedia cites its sources. You can clink the link and read them yourself and they're from reputable outlets and historians. Here are a few from the section I quoted: Jonathan Schanzer - Hamas vs. Fatah: The Struggle for Palestine, Palgrave Macmillan (November 11, 2008) ISBN 0-230-60905-8. https://www.jpost.com/Opinion/1989-and-the-rise-of-Hamas-611745#google_vignette https://theintercept.com/2018/02/19/hamas-israel-palestine-conflict/ https://www.timesofisrael.com/for-years-netanyahu-propped-up-hamas-now-its-blown-up-in-our-faces/ https://tribune.com.pk/story/2302309/how-and-why-israel-helped-create-hamas?amp=1

They don't steal all of it. A lot of it still gets to the starving civilians. Hamas skimming off the top is a price I'm willing to pay to prevent famine.

It sounds like you think conservatives need safe spaces, no? Education requires learning about the world, and that includes viewpoints different than yours. What conservatives want now is what the overzealous "Social Justice Warriors" of the past wanted - to sanitize the world so they don't have to feel icky when they see something they don't agree with. It was wrong then and it's wrong now. You can't complain about entitlement and weakness in the youth while kicking and screaming about how they should be protected from every belief and opinion you disagree with. That is exactly what breeds entitlement and weakness.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israeli_support_for_Hamas "Another alternative to the PLO encouraged by Israeli officials was Islamist politician Ahmed Yassin, a Muslim Brotherhood member who ran a network of mosques, clubs, and schools in Gaza. During the 1970s and 1980s, Israel granted licences and support to Yassin so that he could build and expand his network.[2][18] American research Jonathan Schanzer wrote that "by the late 1970s, the Israelis believed that they had found Fatah’s Achilles’ heel ... Fatah had become anxious over the growing influence of the Muslim Brotherhood in Gaza," saying that the Israelis subsequently "made the ill-fated decision to permit the Brotherhood to operate with relatively little oversight" so that it would undermine the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO).[19] In the late 1980s, Yassin's network would evolve into the armed Islamist and nationalist group Hamas."[20] @Husker_Du

Yeah, the US government and UN were just handing money over to Hamas. The same entities that endlessly defend Israel's right to do whatever they want. We won't even let the UN sanction them for obvious violations of international law with the settlements. But yeah, we love giving Hamas money! If the US ever gave Hamas money, it would be to prop them up so that Israel continues to have an excuse to annex land and kill civilians. That's actually why Israel funded and empowered Hamas in the first place back in the 80s.

It IS for the civilians. Hamas steals from it. It is not given directly to Hamas.

because they're secretly conservative and not a true ally of black liberation. he calls conservatives the "wolf" and liberals the "fox." the reason the fox is more dangerous is because it hides the fact that it is a predator like the wolf. no wonder you believe the things you do. you're functionally illiterate. this is 4th grade reading level stuff.

You: *points at a disciplinary hearing proceeding according to set rules and procedures, including an appeal process* "What, no due process?" Brother, what do you think due process is? Also, state bar organizations are not part of the US government. They are not required to follow "due process," though they choose to do so anyway by their own preference. My advice to you would be to take a couple hours to read our Constitution. It's not a long document or hard to follow.

You know he's not praising conservatives here, right? He's criticizing liberals for being conservative. Also, I would never call myself a liberal.

They were blocking *all* students. You're either stupid or cynical.

Terrorists still have due process rights.

There wouldn't be any Republican judges left in this country.

Even this is gibberish lol

It would be fun to pick a random immigrant who just crossed the border and put him up against you on a basic civics test to see who wins.

The answer to "what's happening" is obvious. When you reduce negative social pressure against something, incidence increases. If you're not following, there wasn't a drastic increase of people who were left handed in the early 1900s. Society became more accepting of left-handedness and stopped forcing left-handed children to use their right hands, revealing the true number of left-handed individuals was actually much higher than believed. It got easier to be a trans person in America, so more trans people came out of the closet. What you want is for them to stay in the closet. It's not going to change who they really are though.

Look for the countries on this list that are listed as "-present" and you'll find some potential new homes with legal systems closer to what you desire. Happy to be of service in finding you a home country more in line with your values! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right-wing_dictatorship

You know he was grinning ear to ear when he typed "absentia" because he thought it would make him look smart.

dup.