jross

I DO NOT CARE IF A SMALL PERCENTAGE OF PEOPLE ARE NOT ALLOWED TO COMPETE AS XY IN XX AND FEEL THIS IS AN INJUSTICE. LIFE IS NOT FAIR.

Intersex, raised a girl, none of that matters. XY should not box XX, especially when multiple competitors say the XY hits with the power of a man reports of high testosterone

My daughter quit gymnastics at 15. Strong as an ox. Level 2 of 10 technical skill and 10 of 10 strength. Conditioning maybe 5 of 10. She went about 20 - 10 each of her first two years without having a clue what to do. Went from practicing 20 hours to 25 hours weekly for gymnastics to about 5 hours weekly for wresting. She can frustrate the heck out of kids with better skill that can't navigate her strength. In high school, I had two former men gymnasts on my wrestling team. Both boys were mini Greek statues. One made top 8 at state with little technical skill. The other had youth wrestling experience and medaled multiple times.

Join us in the sewers.

@uncle bernard What does it tell the world when the boxers have not sued and have not shared their own XX/XY results? Why hasn't the organization shared the results? It is most likely that these 'women' have XY chromosomes and the org does not want to be sued for violating privacy rights.

Kamala was not elected by the people to the VP or to the Presidential nominee position, rather she was chosen by elites based on her identity as a multiracial woman. No matter how qualified (or non qualified) Kamala might be, Biden was clear with his decision to select a colored and/or woman VP. "I commit that I will in fact will pick a woman to be Vice President" https://www.politico.com/news/2020/03/15/biden-woman-vice-president-131309 “Whomever I pick, preferably it will be someone who was of color and/or a different gender" https://edition.cnn.com/2019/08/28/politics/joe-biden-potential-vp-pick/index.html He also reflected on what her VP nomination meant for “little Black and brown girls who so often feel overlooked and undervalued in their communities.” He makes no mention of selecting the best candidate based on strength of one's ability, character, ...merit. Kamala did extremely poor in 2020, as stated by her helpers that if she can't run a campaign, she can't run a country. She didn't win a single delegate... https://web.archive.org/web/20191129104131/https://www.nytimes.com/2019/11/29/us/politics/kamala-harris-2020.html

Yes, that is one way to interpret this. 1. Do you support ensuring everyone has the same outcomes? (Kamala does) This vides explains how we should treat people as unequal so they get the same outcomes 2. Do you support making all illegal aliens as American citizens? (Kamala does) Kamala supports an eight-year path to citizenship for the ~11 million people living in the U.S. without legal status. 3. Do you support elections that includes non citizen voting? (Kamala does) Isidewith.com says "yes" for Kamala. Looking into the reference, the quote does not directly support that her answer is yes. This raises doubt to how isidewith picks answers. It is possible that additional thought is from an inferrment of being anti Voter ID, pro immigration rights, along with the general Democrat responses of 'yes.' https://www.isidewith.com/candidates/kamala-harris/policies/electoral/right-of-foreigners-to-vote 4. Do you support freedom to choose abortion for the entire duration of the pregnancy? (Kamala does) She refuses to answer the question about viability. She does not support bills that define viability. https://justfacts.votesmart.org/candidate/key-votes/120012/kamala-harris/2/abortion For example, Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/senate-bill/3275 Other Democrats like RFK JR have been more clear with their late term support. Has done some backtracking but here it is. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ofgEsYMapcA&t=226s 5. Do you support defunding police? (Kamala does) 6. Do you support foreign interference in other's affairs -- war, etc.? (Kamala does) "The United States will support Ukraine for as long as it takes." "Given the immense scale of suffering in Gaza, there must be an immediate cease-fire for at least the next six weeks." RFK JR on Kamala's track record. 7. Do you support higher taxes to increase subsidies for loan forgiveness and higher benefit payout for illegal aliens and citizens? (Kamala does) https://www.forbes.com/sites/adamminsky/2024/07/25/kamala-harris-touts-student-loan-forgiveness-for-5-million-borrowers-warns-of-threats-to-programs/ https://taxfoundation.org/blog/kamala-harris-tax-proposals-2024/ 8. Do you support teaching critical race theory in schools? (Kamala does) https://apnews.com/article/kamala-harris-florida-desantis-education-9ccbeac59d1f8289e1d8c9bccbff85a9 9. Do you support censoring speech? (Kamala does) Isidewith did not have a reference for Kamala and defaulted to her voters primary answer "No, freedom of speech laws should only protect you from criticizing the government." She has made statements that support censorship. 10. Do you support banning guns? (Kamala does) 11. Do you support biological males beating up females in boxing? (Kamala does) isidewith shows that Kamala supporters believe transgender athletes should be allowed to compete against athletes that differ from their assigned sex at birth. This is how isidewith marked Kamala as a 'yes.' In follow up research, Kalama is 100% for rainbow rights (no issue, people have rights)... but cannot find an direct statement for or against supporting XYs competing against XX in sports.

Youtube has been pushing Kamala Harris ads requesting money from me. Ick.

Looking in the wrong place. Flip over to FM and you can hear the liberal songs and DJ discussion.

Mine: Russel Cohen - 87%, Donald Trump 78%, RFK JR 73%, Kamala Harris 35% Interesting that we overlap on RFK JR. Would RJK Jr as the democrat candidate get independent and republican consideration even though he is a big gov guy?

https://www.isidewith.com/ allows reviewing politician views and policies. You can take the survey and compare to self views as well. The site is neutral. https://www.thebipartisanpress.com/politics/what-is-isidewiths-bias/

That statement is on par with 'media bias is a conspiracy' comment. The internet is forever and one can show many media articles, politician quotes, and citizen parroting on X.com that discussed how sharp Biden is and how he would crush Trump in the debate. There was a liberal meltdown on media and X.com after the debate because Biden's performance was a surprise.

Donald and Kamala will say the things that liberals and conservatives want to hear. You will hear what you want to hear and dismiss unconsciously what you do not. The media will spin their spin. You will soak up this media and harden your existing bias. Their attacks on each other do not matter. Policy matters. Do you support ensuring everyone has the same outcomes? (Kamala does) Do you support making all illegal aliens as American citizens? (Kamala does) Do you support elections that includes non citizen voting? (Kamala does) Do you support freedom to choose abortion for the entire duration of the pregnancy? (Kamala does) Do you support defunding police? (Kamala does) Do you support foreign interference in other's affairs -- war, etc.? (Kamala does) Do you support higher taxes to increase subsidies for loan forgiveness and higher benefit payout for illegal aliens and citizens? (Kamala does) Do you support teaching critical race theory in schools? (Kamala does) Do you support censoring speech? (Kamala does) Do you support banning guns? (Kamala does) Do you support biological males beating up females in boxing? (Kamala does) It doesn't matter that Kamala couldn't win a debate against her Democratic peers in 2020. It doesn't matter that Kamala was a DEI VP selection and is now a DEI potential president nominee. The rumors of how she gained early career opportunities do not matter. Her cackling annoying laugh is what it is. She cannot communicate clearly without a projector... She hasn't accomplished her VP assignments... None of this matters. What matters is that her policies are anti American and bad for current citizens. It doesn't matter that Trump is an asshole, etc. etc.. Trump policies are better.

The man has debated on stage against tens of political sharks. He isn't afraid of Kamala... she who was owned by her own party competitors in the 2020 debates. Did Trump ever agree to debate Kamala in August?

How much scientific evidence is required for the IOC to determine that these XY boxers with elevated testosterone levels have a disproportionate competitive advantage? https://stillmed.olympics.com/media/Documents/Beyond-the-Games/Human-Rights/IOC-Framework-Fairness-Inclusion-Non-discrimination-2021.pdf#page=4 --- -------------- They could listen to athletes that competed against them. Everyone talking in the comments about how unfair this boxing match was...

It is unfortunate for the competitors but XYs should not be competing against XXs in boxing. https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2020/02/200205132404.htm#:~:text=But even with roughly uniform,with time and with purpose

I'll bet $50 or comparable that Trump debates the official Democratic presidential nominee, no matter who it is.

Talk radio is conservative where I live, and I am not aware of talk radio nation wide. Social Media? You say too much about your awareness. Top social media apps and platforms for 2024 and their bias based on 2020 political donations (per open secrets) 1. Facebook — 3.05 billion MAUs (left) 2. WhatsApp — 2.78 billion MAUs (left) 3. YouTube — 2.49 billion MAUs (left) 4. Instagram — 2.04 billion MAUs (left) 5. WeChat (Chinese Tencent) — 1.32 billion MAUs (left) 6. TikTok (Chinese ByteDance) — 1.22 billion MAUs (left) 7. Telegram (Russia) — 800 million MAUs (unknown) 8. Snapchat — 750 million MAUs (left) 9. Kuaishou (Chinese) — 673 million MAUs (unknown) 10. Sina Weibo (Chinese) — 599 million MAUs (unknown) 11. X (formerly Twitter) — 550 million MAUs (still left) 12. Pinterest — 465 million MAUs (left) 13. Reddit — 430 million MAUs (left) 14. LinkedIn — 424 million MAUs (left) 15. Quora — 300 million MAUs (unknown but California based) 16. Discord — 154 million MAUs (left) 17. Twitch — 140 million MAUs (left) 18. Tumblr — 135 million MAUs (left) 19. Threads by Instagram — 100 million (left) Edit: left off QQ and QZone by Tencent (China), BlueSky, and Mastodon. All sites pulled from https://buffer.com/library/social-media-sites/ and cross checked against open secrets.

She is correct. College aged kids/adults make bad decisions. The brains kicks in when one takes direct responsibility for self and another level when responsible for others.

Not ALL. See https://www.allsides.com/media-bias X is notably better than Twitter. 9 of 10 famous new sites... lean left Yahoo (left) Fox News (right) CNBC (center left) CBS (left) CNN (left) NBC News (left) NY Times (left) MSN (left) Forbes (center left) Washington Post (left) Google Is Left Biased

Two observable reasons: 1. The unconscious nature of the environment Google, etc. is headquartered in very liberal cities. Google engineers claim they are fired for their conservative views, are uncomfortable expressing their views, and conservatives don't want to live in San Fran or work for google. Liberal values are opposite from conservative values concerning government intervention, free speech, etc. Liberal ethics result in shadow bans, censorship, and word exclusions that match their values (that conflict with conservative values) 2. Intentional Power Controlling information gives power by shaping public opinion, setting the agenda, framing narratives, and suppressing dissent.

Robert Epstein is not a conservative. Robert uses strong evidence to show anti-conservative bias. Robert votes for Democrats. This quote is appropriate. “I have become a darling of conservatives, which is driving me crazy,” Epstein said. “But they love me because I am saying things they want to hear. People I am closer to politically don’t want to hear what I have to say.”