jross

Its a start. States win $400M lawsuit against Google for location tracking. https://www.michigan.gov/ag/news/press-releases/2022/11/14/40-attorneys-general-announce-historic-google-settlement-over-location-tracking-practices

One of my kids is doing an assignment tonight on where things are from. She walked around the house and identified 20 items across 12 countries; not a single one was from the U.S.A.

Recent examples Collusion != Obstruction Allows for != Calls for You have the wrong conclusion from Trump's statement. The media is doing it to undercut him. What's your reason?

$70 - https://www.universalclass.com/i/course/reading-comprehension-101.htm

How many champions will lose?

I don't know how some of these idiots get elected and then re-elected.

You can make similar statements to the right... but you can't deny it on the left.

I remember Clinton's economy was good; he came from Arkansas and reminded me of JFK with his womanizing ways. I read that his impeachment was not good for the Republicans. Some difference here is that the Democrats have overplayed their hand with big tech, the media, and the government/house majority behaviors. They have been overwhelmingly mean-spirited for the last six years. They've pushed hoax after hoax, but the left's people don't see it. The left doesn't get the self-critical news, and those who get presented with the facts don't believe them, just like Yuri Bezmenov said would occur. I am very impressed with BanBBall's KWWL news with their self-authored articles. But the Bias is there with their decision to show CCN national articles and not to publish the big Twitter scandal. Biden's approval rating is terrible compared to Clinton's 70% (at the time of impeachment). Unlike the optimistic view of Clinton's economy, the people feel Biden has been awful for the economy. None of this will matter. Unless more neutrality and transparency in big tech occurs, you are correct that impeachment would cause blowback against the right.

2008 149lbs World (note: World or Olympic, excluding World Cup) 4 Senior World Team Members Brent Metcalf Dustin Schlatter Bryce Saddoris Jordan Burroughs Junior Bubba Jenkins NCAA 6 National Champions Bubba Jenkins (2nd 2008, 1st 2011) Brent Metcalf (1st 2008, 2nd 2009, 1st 2010,) Jordan Burroughs (3rd 2008, 1st 2009, 1st 2011) Darrion Caldwell (5th 2008, 1st 2009) Dustin Schlatter (1st 2006, 3rd 2007, 7th 2008) J.P. O'Connor (5th 2007, 6th 2008, 1st 2010) Another 4 with a best finish of 2nd or 3rd (one loss) Ryan Lang Josh Churella Lance Palmer Adam Hall 13 All-Americans with 31 total AA achievements at the NCAAs. The other AAs not listed previously are Don Fisch Jake Patacsil Bryce Saddoris

I read today that the House can impeach a president for whatever reason they like with a simple majority. Thankfully it takes a 2/3 majority in the Senate. The house can impeach Biden for any reason, including lies, Twitter files, Ukraine conflict of interest, creepy showers with his daughter, because he likes ice cream, ...for any reason. The Biden campaign influencing Twitter to suppress information and Biden's lies are reason enough to impeach him in the house. The worst possible outcome would be if somehow Biden was impeached from the Senate because we'd be stuck with Harris.

Smart people have already looked into the redo question https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/what-happens-if-the-election-was-a-fraud-the-constitution-doesnt-say/ https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1907903 It is unclear. Doesn't matter. At this point, it's on to 2024.

Mr. 159-0 Wheaties box man (Cael) listed the three goals as a first-grader: Be a good student. Be a good person. Be an Olympic champion. https://www.deseret.com/2004/9/15/19850617/athlete-of-the-month-olympic-gold-was-sanderson-s-goal

Kylie Welker is close. It could happen.

12-bar blues

It was meant to be. Max will be mentally ready when its tourney time.

For specificity, are you talking about collusion or obstruction?

You met me online anyways, and what was the report's outcome after an extremely expensive hunt? While the investigation found links between Russia and folks on the Trump campaign, the evidence was insufficient for criminal charges. I believe Russia hacked the DNC and hurt the democratic campaign with leaks. If Trump were found guilty of collusion with Russia and coordinated the DNC hacks and leaks... that would have been terrible... and it would not have changed my vote in 2016 since I did not vote for Trump. Russia's hacking of Podesta was bad; however, it was good that those emails were leaked because of what was learned. Like this. Imagine if Twitter had knowledge of this in 2020, they would have suppressed it. Horrible. Left-leaning CBS story said.

I read the report.

Misbehavior is no surprise. These behaviors are a surprise: valuing facts over emotion listening, challenging self-beliefs, and openness to change admitting when you are wrong and apologizing directly acknowledge and address rather than deflect

I don't enjoy talking about how bad people are, and I am not interested in describing who is the worst. Cause then we start talking about Biden, the bad father, the racist, the bad policies... and Trump is a bad man... Which of those 16 statements do you believe in? Zero, eight, sixteen for sixteen?

On your point. I bet there is truth to whatever is documented on your wiki link. Trump does bad things. Biden is also a bad dude, but not all is listed. There is a large list with Obama too. Back to the question, which of those 16 statements is true?

How does the media go from the context of allow "gives permission" to call "orders?" I don't like Trump, the person. I didn't vote for him in 2016; I did in 2020; I probably won't in 2024 unless it's Biden or Harris as opposition. Trump is asking what can be done. "Do you throw out? Do you have a new election?" This situation, in his words, permits termination... But hear me, if he said 'demands termination,' I am comfortable with his statement of preference. He has no power to be a dictator in this country. Trump supports the country and the constitution on the people's rights. In a fraud situation, there is no constitutional policy/law that says what to do. Some say a new election could occur. Others say the current president could be impeached. It's unclear, and a court would decide, not the constitution and not Trump. I've got my popcorn ready for the forthcoming lawsuits. Given the swamp on both sides, I don't expect anything to become of this, but it will be fun to watch.

Which of these are true?

A leftist signaled this was already occurring. The critics said BS. The Twitter files confirm the serious risk of big tech influencing elections. https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/Epstein Testimony.pdf

Cool. I thought you might believe in the 2016 Russia Collusion hoax. You didn't say that so there's how my own bias shows.