Jump to content

VakAttack

Members
  • Posts

    3,382
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    22

Everything posted by VakAttack

  1. Maybe, but there is a pattern. I want it to be better.
  2. Doubtful. There are two separate issues being dealt with: 1. Alleged criminal violations by Anthony Knox, Jr., which are related to whether Anthony committed a crime. 2. Administrative/civil proceedings related to high school eligibility which are related to whether Anthony violated any standing administrative rule and/or whether the administrative body violated his rights in some way by disqualifying him. There could eventually be a third if anybody sues the Knoxes. The only current ruling we have is related to the second issue, and is focused on the alleged violation of his rights and their own rules, which the NJSIAA disputes.
  3. The judge's ruling is separate from criminal proceedings.
  4. Honestly they get a bad rap on certain things. Not on all things, but as far as the athletes on their squad, they seem to care DEEPLY about them. They seem to struggle with if/when the relationship ends.
  5. Nobody knows, because he's missed all his potentially tough matches. He's PROBABLY a threat, though.
  6. Sort of, but I think the idea here is that erring one way is more reversible than the other. If Knox eventually prevailed but wasn't allowed to wrestle, there's no way to "fix" that. If NJSIAA prevails, they can strike him from the record books and bump everyone up. Not a perfect solution, but more feasible.
  7. Not sure what the craziest part was: hinting he will transfer, the religious talk about purging lust from his body, or openly saying he doesn't have the best teammates.
  8. Lol, no i would not rather be get Lovett, a much better wrestler. EDIT: You're confusing the argument as to why SVN should get the 1 with the reason why most people defaulted to that argument. You could just as easily argue SVN had the "worst" loss because he lost to the guy with 2 losses. Or that Parco had the most "quality wins". Etc. We all know the arguments as to why any of the guys would get the 1, but people defaulted to the PSU guys logic, and I believe that is based on the "PSU bump." People give PSU the benefit of the doubt (and I'm not even saying that is unearned.)
  9. I % agree there is an argument for why SVN should be (and eventually was) given the 1. I'm saying his argument was no stronger than Lovett's or Parco's, but I think most of us assumed it would go this way, and the reason is because SVN is at PSU.
  10. I think it was assumed, but there's not really a logic behind it being the predominant thought other than "because he's at PSU." Based on his season this year, he has no greater claim than the other guys.
  11. Do they even have set criteria?
  12. So SVN comes out the winner in the 149 conundrum. Man, it's about time PSU caught some breaks.
  13. If Kueter can keep the 6 seed, that's a win for him and a good shot to the semis. EDIT: Nevermind, I see they had two guys listed as the 5 seed for some reason.
  14. Mineo demanding everyone apologize to him after multiple situations with him getting things wrong, deleting the Tweets, and never addressing those wrongs is high comedy. Eff that guy.
  15. Why would I follow Kash Patel's lead?
  16. Sure thing, buddy. Just like 6 days ago.
  17. I wonder how Penn State fans feel about this obvious rift among their guys? It mainly seems to be between Taylor and everyone else, which is weird since Taylor is likely the "face" of the Cael Era.
  18. Never get caught up in short term market gains or losses. Look at indicators. Now, to be fair, those look like crap, too, but I'll defer to smarter people than me on that, like @Wrestleknownothing and my own investments guy. WKN, how is it looking to you? Also, BTW, for some reason you can't receive PMs.
  19. It should go without saying, since it's the Dems, but this is undeniably cringey. None of them have the swag to pull this off.
  20. Pro wrestling term that means "lose to your opponent."
  21. LOL. Fine, I looked into it. This is a very public and purposeful campaign. https://www.booker.senate.gov/news/press/new-video-sht-that-aint-true-president-trumps-vow-to-lower-prices-on-day-one That's Booker's official website. Nice try, lol. You trying to equate this very public and open campaign (as in, they're not trying to hide and openly admitting what they're doing) with online influencers trying to pretend they are making organic and independent content is hilarious. Anyway, where are the files?
  22. "it's so clear, this video of dozens of people saying different things all at the same time with almost no words being able to be differentiated." Anyway, where are the files?
×
×
  • Create New...