VakAttack

Someone texted me about this, so I'm taking time away from my wife, kids, and pool day just to let you know, don't worry about it, although i truly appreciate the concern. I posted the picture myself. I have nothing to hide. Is it weird that the guy is saving photos of a random man on the internet from over a year ago? Sure, but who am I to kink shame? Anyway, back to the pool party. If @Ohio Elite asks nicely, I'll post a pic of me in my board shorts.

#Efficiency

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/justice-department/trump-admin-permits-sale-device-allows-standard-firearms-fire-machine-rcna207395?cid=sm_npd_nn_tw_ma&taid=6827d89f7e99eb000154d2e9&utm_campaign=trueanthem&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter "Since the forced reset trigger devices will not be considered firearms, they can be purchased anonymously, without a background or age check. Machine guns have been illegal in the United States since 1986, a notion that even gun rights groups have come to accept." What could go wrong?

https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/tv/tv-news/department-of-homeland-security-considering-citizen-competition-reality-show-1236219599/ "Tributes, we welcome you. We salute your courage and your sacrifice... and we wish you... Happy Hunger Games! And may the odds be ever in your favor."

Let's ask a business genius his thoughts:

Quote me 7 more times with the spurned lover energy you always have and that will make this true. We're done here, I don't speak to Betas anymore.

Cry more.

Beta.

No, Beta Jimmy.

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha. This has to be a bit.

Sad. Embarrassing. 86 the Alpha Male moniker for these Betas.

It caused blowback. So he deleted it. This happens all the time with many kinds of Tweets. Seriously this is embarrassing from the Alpha Male crowd.

LOL. This is embarrassing. Do they typically do this in public tweets? No, I think he meant to get him out of office either thru the 25th amendment or impeachment.

Trying to change the subject AGAIN I see. to 86 something has a meaning, and it isn't murder. Sorry.

Well, you see, we live in a constitutional republic, so when we refer to getting rid of an elected official, it doesn't mean murder. The amount of stretching you all are doing on this topic is hilarious.

Here are your only posts in this thread. So no you didn't.

Higher in my personal estimation? Tony Ramos. I'm not sure anybody has lit up Carver like Tony did in pinning Conaway, pinning Gulibon the next year, and beating JO straight up, no flukes. Epic. Plus he has the title, and he came closer to beating his Big Bad (Stieber) than Caliendo has yet.

I think you're misremembering Tony's first three years. He was very aggressive.

I am, that's when I got REALLY into it. After him, it's probably Desanto. Then you have guys like Borschel, Tony Ramos, Montell Marion, Spencer Lee, Mike Evans, Derek St. John, Michael Kemerer, Cory Clark. Used to have Gilman high up there. These are all guys I got to watch their matches live, as they were happening. bviousluy there are great guys from ebfore this era, but since I can only watch videos and know the results beforehand, it loses some of the drama that I connect with. Tony Ramos in particular has given me some insane memories (the two pins over PSU, the upset of Oliver, the turn in OT to win his title).

I love Metcalf. My personal favorite Hawkeye. He has not shown himself to be an elite level coach or recruiter.

Rivalries still exist, Bruce. I watched the duals this year, great energy.

You're just making things up because it makes you feel better. It is literally impossible to be prepared for any claim a person might make if nobody has made it before. Impossible. No amount of preparation can prepare you for the every single possibility. You're expecting an impossible standard, and as usual, just sliding past the first point I made because you don't have an answer for it.

No. Firstly, I have no idea if he pushed back, the video stops immediately after he Markwayne makes the claim. Secondly, you can't be immediately prepared to refute any claim anybody makes in an interview, especially of you have no idea if they're going to say it. That's why it's on the person putting forward the claim to prove it, not any and all listeners to refute it.

Yup. Just some of that famous altruistic and deep-seated love for Iowa that permeates the non-Iowa wrestling fanbase.

You have to offer evidence for people to refute, otherwise you're demanding they prove an ambiguous negative, which is impossible.