Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, Paul158 said:

She can take her brother/husband with her.

Gov “tax cheat” Pritzker blamed Trump and Jan 6.  Surprise surprise  

Posted
4 minutes ago, mspart said:

We were mostly unified in WWI, WWII, and Sept 11.  

mspart

Yes, wars tend to bring a nation together, unfortunately.

Posted
1 minute ago, Paul158 said:

Yes, wars tend to bring a nation together, unfortunately.

Necessarily.   I think you are saying it is unfortunate at other times a nation is not unified generally.    

mspart

Posted
3 minutes ago, mspart said:

Necessarily.   I think you are saying it is unfortunate at other times a nation is not unified generally.    

mspart

Yes, unfortunately political parties tend to divide us as we have seen in the last few elections. You and I are now deplorable Nazi's. The liberal media is a willing accomplice. Chaos seems to help their ratings. 

Posted
38 minutes ago, Offthemat said:

New suspect: they have a name, Salt Lake City resident, some military experience.

Was there a new FBI news conference?

.

Posted (edited)
7 minutes ago, ionel said:

Was there a new FBI news conference?

https://www.bbc.com/news/live/c206zm81z4gt

I think this is 23 mins old or so 

 

Authorities have name of person of interest, say sourcespublished at 16:54

16:54BREAKING

Two US officials and a law enforcement source say they believe they have identified the name of a "person of interest", according to the BBC's US partner, CBS News.

CBS adds that no arrest warrant has been issued yet.

Edited by Caveira
Posted
1 minute ago, Caveira said:

https://www.bbc.com/news/live/c206zm81z4gt
 

 

Thanks.  Thought FBI was supposed to have a new release ~5 ... 7et but kept delaying.  

.

Posted
1 hour ago, ionel said:

Was there a new FBI news conference?

That came from John Solomon and Just the News.   There’s a news conference scheduled for 7:30 your time.

Posted
1 minute ago, Offthemat said:

That came from John Solomon and Just the News.   There’s a news conference scheduled for 7:30 your time.

Yep just about live now.  

.

Posted
12 hours ago, jross said:

If anyone cared about gun violence, cities would welcome the national guard with open arms.

Your post is incredibly stupid - it makes no sense at all.

People who care about gun violence (basically everyone) should welcome the NG?

I realize your posts are all AI driven, and you are nothing but a clown behind them.

You're doing badly.

More importantly, for everyone else here - trust nothing that comes from this turd poster.

Posted
10 hours ago, jross said:

If one wanted to dramatically reduce gun violence, they would

  • Execute a plan to increase the black father's presence in a two-parent family home.
  • Heavily police the few blocks (hot spots) in major cities where gun violence predominantly occurs.
  • Invest in smart gun technology that is reliable for the owner(s) in a time of need.  (specifically hand guns) 
    • and then mandate the smart gun technology on new guns

Somewhere after abortions, gangs, crimes, auto accidents, drugs, medical, drowning... one will eventually stumble onto the priority of school/church shootings.  Why is there so much attention on the school shooting outlier in comparison to the other ridiculousness occurring at much higher rates?

To Charlie's end... there isn't a gun restriction practical that would have prevented his assassination.

Oh goodness. Your post 2 hours after the earlier one is even worse.

Seems your effort is to sell Chinese smart gun technology. Good luck with that.

Posted
9 hours ago, jross said:

I've done the research into gun violence using Federal data and was surprised.  The analysis and conclusion is my own in the first link below:

  1. https://intermatwrestle.com/forums/topic/3143-actual-conservative-policies-or-stances/#comment-100986
  2. https://intermatwrestle.com/forums/topic/147-seriously-michigan/page/12/#comment-21698

The one finding that makes me scratch my head some is that most gun violence is through stolen hand guns.  They guys committing the crimes don't have legal ownership.  They are getting their guns from legal owners.  So banning or heavily restricting legal hand guns reduces the guns available to be stolen.  You are not going to ban hand guns so how to make it safer?  Biometric smart gun technology becomes interesting because a thief cannot use the gun.  You need the ability to have multiple bio people linkages (e.g. 10 cops can all fire the same gun).  Except currently smart guns are easily hackable.  At least a smart gun prevents a toddler from accidental use.  The other problem with smart guns is that bio tech fails.  Like the face recognition and fingerprint reader on my devices sometimes fail.  If that was to fail when I needed it for defense, its a non starter.  So we need better smarter guns and then I'd support hand gun regulations involving smart gun tech.

And... yet another advertisement for Chinese smart guns.

Most people trying to sell things around here don't last long. This clown is a cockroach.

Posted
1 hour ago, Tripnsweep said:

 

 

They don't seem to comprehend that these "news" sources of theirs exist only to make a profit and will happily post lies if it gets them more views.

The same ones that excitedly "distrust mainstream media" for the sole reason of diverting attention to their $-for-view sites.

Geez, we're in quite a pickle here with folks who don't even want to know better.

 

  • Bob 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...