Jump to content

All-Century NCAA Bracket: 157  

13 members have voted

  1. 1. Which was the toughest 157 bracket this century?

    • 2001
      3
    • 2009
      2
    • 2014
      2
    • 2018
      6
    • Other
      0


Recommended Posts

Posted
157 2001 2009 2014 2018
1st T.J. Williams Jordan Burroughs Alex Dieringer Jason Nolf
2nd Bryan Snyder Michael Poeta Dylan Ness Hayden Hidaley
3rd Shane Roller Jordan Leen James Green Tyler Berger
4th Luke Becker Gregor Gillespie Ian Miller Michael Kemerer
5th Eric Jorgenson Michael Chandler Derek St. John Alec Pantaleo
6th Kirk White Matt Moley Brian Realbuto Micah Jordan
7th Yoshi Nakamura Chase Pami Isaac Jordan Josh Shields
8th Gray Maynard Tyler Safratowich Anthony Perrotti Luke Zilverberg

 

Not to sway any voters, but fun fact.. the 2014 podium crew (if my math is mathing) ended their careers with 28 AA honors.

Posted

Some of the others seem to have recency bias attached to the results... for this one I think 2018 is just simply the best bracket.  2014 is pretty lit, as well.

"I know actually nothing.  It isn't even conjecture at this point." - me

 

 

Posted (edited)

That top4 in 2009 is absolutely incredible, going with that.  Especially since I believe Leen and Gillespie had already been champs, this isn't a situation where someone places 7/8 as a frosh and becomes a monster later. 

Didn't Pami make the finals too?  

Edited by Gantry
Posted
11 minutes ago, Gantry said:

That top4 in 2009 is absolutely incredible, going with that.  Especially since I believe Leen and Gillespie had already been champs, this isn't a situation where someone places 7/8 as a frosh and becomes a monster later. 

Didn't Pami make the finals too?  

Correct! Gregor won the title in 2007 at 149, and Leen was the 157 champ the year before in 2008.

And correct again, Pami made the finals the following year in 2010 where he fell to J.P. O'Connor.

Posted
2 hours ago, nhs67 said:

Some of the others seem to have recency bias attached to the results... for this one I think 2018 is just simply the best bracket.  2014 is pretty lit, as well.

I'm probably a little bias based on how much I loved watching those 2014 guys. 

The 1/4s match in 2015 with the OT scoring error between Ian Miller and Brian Realbuto is all time.

Ness and Miller were appointment viewing.

James Green was unbelievable but every year the question was whether or not he could get it done when it matters. 

Ringer was emerging as one of the best P4P wrestlers in D1.

and that's not even mentioning that 2014 was returning NCAA champion Derek St. John's worse NCAA finish.

But don't ask me where my vote went. 🤫

Posted

What criteria do you use ? Total career AAs? Just a quick glance it seems 2011 has 3 ncaa champs with Bubba,DT and St.john and a finalist with Welch and a few other multi time AAs like Hall and Fleming is arguably better then 2018 in my opinion 

Posted
7 minutes ago, Antitroll2828 said:

What criteria do you use ? Total career AAs? Just a quick glance it seems 2011 has 3 ncaa champs with Bubba,DT and St.john and a finalist with Welch and a few other multi time AAs like Hall and Fleming is arguably better then 2018 in my opinion 

I don't use any sort of numerical data to make my picks. I try to find a balance between the star-power in the bracket and being realistic to who they were at the time. I'm glad you brought up the 2011 bracket because it's a great example of my thought process..

Yes, there are three champs in that bracket, and another finalist. However, DT, St. John, and Welch were all Freshman in this tournament. Wunderkind David Taylor had been on a bonus tear during that season, but many were still wondering how he would do against a guy like Steve Fittery, who, while very good, isn't a name many would know outside of hardcore fans. Adam Hall as well, many probably remember him as a very solid multi-time AA, but he's far from an all-time guy and was the top seed going into the tournament. IMO it's hard to consider a bracket for All-Time best when the top two seeds aren't particularly noteworthy. 

It's far from perfect as it's really my subjective opinion that is leading the cause, but that's why I am interested to hear others make the case for other years. 

I do the subjective analysis based on research and my personal bias, and then @Wrestleknownothing comes with the hard numbers.

PS: Tomorrow has one of the most intriguing brackets so far, imo! Stay tuned.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...