Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
30 minutes ago, mspart said:

Seattle went with a less crazy mayor and for the most part the crazy is not as extreme.   It is still crazy but not as bad.   Will they go for a republican.   Not in the forseeable future.   But they have backed off of the extremists.  Chicago, has the chance to change direction.   Will they?

mspart

Like the Chicago bears.  I’ll believe it when I see it and not before.  They are run by the unions.  The teachers union has to Much power.  Chicago public schools aren’t even good.  

Posted
3 hours ago, Offthemat said:

 

SCARBOROUGH: So let me ask you, Mr. Mayor, those all sound like great programs. I’m curious, would you also like to get federal funding to help put 5000 more cops on the street in Chicago? Would that help drive down crime?

JOHNSON: Well, look, policing by itself is not the full strategy.

SCARBOROUGH [INTERRUPTING]: No, I understand that. You’ve talked about the other things you want. And I said those are good and important programs. But I’m asking also, would 5000 more police officers on the street in Chicago be helpful to go along with all of those social programs that a lot of cities are engaging in and having success with?

JOHNSON: Well, look, here’s the best way I can put it, Joe, is that in the 90s, when I was in high school, we had 3000 more police officers, and we had 900 people being murdered every single year in Chicago. It’s just not policing alone. Of course we want more detectives.

SCARBOROUGH: Of course I know policing alone, but, of course it’s not policing alone. You’ve told me everything else you want. I’m curious, and this does come down to an ideological difference between people: do you believe that the streets of Chicago would be safer if there were more uniformed police officers on the streets of Chicago?

JOHNSON: I believe the city of Chicago and cities across America would be safer if we actually had, you know, affordable housing. Look, I’m not saying –

SCARBOROUGH: That not the question I asked. My question is, and I just need a yes or no. Do you believe the streets of Chicago would be safer if you got all of those other extraordinary programs put back into place, which do have a history of being successful, if that’s complimented by having 5000 more cops on the streets of Chicago.

JOHNSON: I don’t believe that we should narrow it down to just police officers is what I’m saying –

SCARBOROUGH: I’m not –

JOHNSON [CONT’D]: – that is an antiquated approach. I’m saying we’ve invested in detectives.

SCARBOROUGH: Are you hearing what I’m saying? I’m agreeing with you that all of these other social programs are extraordinarily important. I just need a yes or a no. And then this will be the last time I ask if you get all of those other social programs that $800 million that New York City does, Los Angeles, other people do with great success? Would an additional 5000 cops on the streets in Chicago help compliment those programs to make Chicago safer?

JOHNSON: Look, we are working hard to make sure that our police department is fully supported. I don’t believe that just simply putting out an arbitrary number around police officers is the answer. What I’m saying is policing and affordable housing. It’s policing and mental and behavioral health care services. It’s policing and youth employment. It’s a full package. Of course, we want to make sure that our police department is fully supported.

Found it on YouTube.  This is the vid of your transcript 

 

Posted
6 minutes ago, Caveira said:

Found it on YouTube.  This is the vid of your transcript 

 

He should be Illinois' next governor.  His talents are kindve wasted on a small town like Chicago.  

  • Haha 1

.

Posted
17 hours ago, Caveira said:

The city of Chicago’s leaders are a joke.  He literally has the worst approval rating of any mayor in the country.     He has a 6% approval rating and an 80% disapproval rating.  
 

My friend, and I say this with sincerity, you should really check things before you hear or read someone say something and run to parrot it….it may save you from looking a fool.  First (well not first but most recently) your Angel Reese debacle, and now repeating a quote from “Big T”, which anyone with sense should know is a no no. 
 

Below is an article from Aug 7 showing his favorable rating at 47%, and several other sources have those similar numbers. Not great for sure….but far far from the 6% your “Big T” lied to you about.  Hint: people lie and have agendas, particularly politicians.  And in this case, particularly a president who claims “I am the President and I can do whatever I want” 

 

https://www.thecentersquare.com/illinois/article_5ed45479-7b20-4f77-989e-136c9971f29e.amp.html

Posted

Why is the dc mayor thanking Trump is this is so bad.  Weird Right?

now @103200410393lgbtiq8485 I don’t know the blaze.  There was a radio station in Chicago called 103.5 the blaze.  This account may be liberal.  They may be Repub.  it may even be fake ai who knows.   I just wanted the video of the mayor thanking Trump. 

Posted
2 hours ago, Caveira said:

Why is the dc mayor thanking Trump is this is so bad.  Weird Right?

now @103200410393lgbtiq8485 I don’t know the blaze.  There was a radio station in Chicago called 103.5 the blaze.  This account may be liberal.  They may be Repub.  it may even be fake ai who knows.   I just wanted the video of the mayor thanking Trump. 

IF anyone needed to see some crap AI posting here to believe it's happening... it was this one. (Although many preceded it.)

Posted
7 hours ago, Caveira said:

Why is the dc mayor thanking Trump is this is so bad.  Weird Right?

now @103200410393lgbtiq8485 I don’t know the blaze.  There was a radio station in Chicago called 103.5 the blaze.  This account may be liberal.  They may be Repub.  it may even be fake ai who knows.   I just wanted the video of the mayor thanking Trump. 

She’s saying more officers does help reduce crime.  Most likely the presence of the NG in DC is going to be temporary.  She wants more DC police officers, not the National Guard.

 

 

 

 

Posted
1 hour ago, 1032004 said:

She’s saying more officers does help reduce crime.  Most likely the presence of the NG in DC is going to be temporary.  She wants more DC police officers, not the National Guard.

 

 

 

 

A reverse that’s not what she said joke ?

then why did she ask congress for the authority to call up the national guard?

 

Posted
9 minutes ago, Caveira said:

A reverse that’s not what she said joke ?

then why did she ask congress for the authority to call up the national guard?

 

Here she references the “DC” National Guard.  In the prior post she is saying that it’s currently the National Guard from other states that is there

Posted
21 minutes ago, WrestlingRasta said:

Conservatives are supposed to understand, and be in favor of, principles such as small  government, sovereignty, separation of powers, etc. 

Those all do and still hold true...but when someone (or multiple someone's) clearly isn't doing their job at the state level isn't it in the best interest of the locals, and quite frankly, all citizens to be protected even if it is by the NG??  And because of that it doesn't change some of the main tenants of the conservative party.

Posted
13 minutes ago, Bigbrog said:

Those all do and still hold true...but when someone (or multiple someone's) clearly isn't doing their job at the state level isn't it in the best interest of the locals, and quite frankly, all citizens to be protected even if it is by the NG??  And because of that it doesn't change some of the main tenants of the conservative party.

I guess we have to start with, is it really a case of 'someone not doing their job', or is hyperbole being fed to the herd and the sheep just following?  (See below)

Second, there is a bigger picture at stake as well.   As I've said before...liberty is not free.   With liberty unfortunately comes the liberty for s**theads to do s**thead things.   Having the military in our streets is not worth the risk of our liberties slowly eroding, piece by piece, over vandetta's.  

 

District Crime Data at a Glance | mpdc

  • Bob 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, WrestlingRasta said:

I guess we have to start with, is it really a case of 'someone not doing their job', or is hyperbole being fed to the herd and the sheep just following?  (See below)

Second, there is a bigger picture at stake as well.   As I've said before...liberty is not free.   With liberty unfortunately comes the liberty for s**theads to do s**thead things.   Having the military in our streets is not worth the risk of our liberties slowly eroding, piece by piece, over vandetta's.  

 

District Crime Data at a Glance | mpdc

I have looked at the data...DC was NOT a safe place to be.  That leads me to believe, as with a lot of others including the president, that someone, or multiple people were not doing their job and thus needed help to get things under control.  Not sure how that is even debatable but guess everything is these days regards less of the facts and truths behind things.

As for liberty, can you point to where having the NG on the streets in DC to help reduce violent crime has, or will erode any law-abiding citizens liberty?

  • Bob 1
  • Fire 1
Posted (edited)

DC is way short of their goal of officers. They offer a $45,000 sign on bonus. Yet they still can’t get people to take the job. Vilifying cops and creating a defund the police movement have led us to this.  Who did people think was going to become the police when there are enough police????  Libturds own this “extra” government. 

Edited by JimmySpeaks

Woke is a Joke 

Posted
16 minutes ago, Bigbrog said:

I have looked at the data...DC was NOT a safe place to be.  That leads me to believe, as with a lot of others including the president, that someone, or multiple people were not doing their job and thus needed help to get things under control.  Not sure how that is even debatable but guess everything is these days regards less of the facts and truths behind things.

As for liberty, can you point to where having the NG on the streets in DC to help reduce violent crime has, or will erode any law-abiding citizens liberty?

Are the NG even patrolling the high crime areas?

Posted
2 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

Are the NG even patrolling the high crime areas?

Them being there is allowing the police to do it.  Like the mayor said 

Woke is a Joke 

Posted
37 minutes ago, Bigbrog said:

guess everything is these days regards less of the facts and truths behind things.

Nuff said.   Data and facts are data and facts….talking heads are talking heads.  
 

We can agree to disagree I guess on which of these deals in facts.  

Posted
46 minutes ago, Bigbrog said:

As for liberty, can you point to where having the NG on the streets in DC to help reduce violent crime has, or will erode any law-abiding citizens liberty?

The full answer to this question would be more like and essay, to try to answer in short I would say: the constitution is a good study, and understanding the ‘how’ to this would require an understanding that in a government set up such as ours, that erosion is not and overnight event, but rather a process with steps.  I am not saying that IS what is happening here, but I am saying it’s a slippery slope.  And there is a point in that slope that once crossed, going back is very very difficult. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...