What color is this guy?

[GreatWhiteNorth]

7 hours ago, Bigbrog said:

Why are a couple of you so hell bent on ensuring Cav knew or knows who Laura Loomer is??  Such a weird argument.

Because they're trying to "bury" the previous posts with new posts. Even if the new posts are nonsense.

Blasting posts about some political stooge creates enough noise to generate a couple pages of discussion.

The previous pages are, afterward, essentially "buried" because nobody reads the earlier pages of any thread.

Casually read through the posts and it will become obvious as to who is "flooding the zone" and who is posting with any type of sincerity.

You might be surprised to find out who the 'good guys' are vs who the 'bad guys' are.

[GreatWhiteNorth]

23 hours ago, GreatWhiteNorth said:

Interesting perspective. But ICE isn't border patrol. ICE is more like the US secret police, or the Nazi SS. We've seen multiple versions from multiple countries over the years. They are above the law, don't document their actions, and answer to nobody.

The CBP with billions of dollars in funding is tasked with taking care of the southern border. Not just this year or last year, but for decades with budgets in the near $10 billion range.

(If anybody tried to tell you we had 'open borders' in the last 30 years, they are lying to you. We've been spending many billions the entire time. You're a sucker if you believe what you've been told.)

Wealthy types like the ones that come from Middle East oil money - get on a plane and fly in. No sneaking required.

Highly educated or not, they walk in.

Our current administration respects money far more than anything else.

(And, yes, you already knew all of this.)

Oh - and here's the post I made that responded to Undefeated. (ABOVE)...

 

And here's a bit more I've just added (BELOW):

And then that E-lunch-door tried to dismiss it.

Most likely had a problem with:

ICE is basically the US secret police (similar to Nazi SS.) Above the law, don't document their actions, answer to nobody, no ID needed, no warrants needed, and cover their faces with masks. Against every one of our Constitutional rights.

ICE REALLY is the US version of the Nazi SS. Our local law enforcement can do nothing but step aside when the ICE SS arrives.

And Trump's big fat ugly bill now made into law - has tremendously increased the ICE budget,

ICE will be the biggest law enforcement group in the country. And will be accountable to nobody except the current Trump administration.

It should start to occur to everyone by now.

ICE has become the US Secret Police - controlled by Trump and his supporters. They can come and snatch you out of your bed, put you on a plane to wherever, and disappear you just like they do in Russia. (It's not theoretical, it's already been happening for at least the past year.)

And there's nothing anyone can do to help you.

• Dept of Justice - Nope, in Trump's pocket*
• Supreme Court - Nope, in Trump's pocket*
• Senate - Nope, in Trump's pocket*
• House of Rep's - Nope, in Trumps pocket*

*Just to be clear, Trump isn't the mastermind behind this. It's his treasonous supporters. And they use Trump as the mouthpiece for this - they know he's far more interested in making personal profit and getting back at his previous political foes than he is about any serious intention to lead the country. He's not a leader; he's simply a profiteer.

This is 'goodbye Constitution level stuff.'

And unless folks start to stand up to this - it would appear it will continue to worsen. Lord help us.

Edited yesterday at 08:43 AM by GreatWhiteNorth

[1032004]

3 hours ago, GreatWhiteNorth said:

Because they're trying to "bury" the previous posts with new posts. Even if the new posts are nonsense.

Blasting posts about some political stooge creates enough noise to generate a couple pages of discussion.

The previous pages are, afterward, essentially "buried" because nobody reads the earlier pages of any thread.

Casually read through the posts and it will become obvious as to who is "flooding the zone" and who is posting with any type of sincerity.

You might be surprised to find out who the 'good guys' are vs who the 'bad guys' are.

I think it’s odd that people keep calling Loomer a “stooge” and a “nobody,” yet she clearly has influence within the White House (and outside of it).

Yes, CNN was wrong.  But they were simply providing a possible description.  They did not make any implications about whites as a whole like Loomer did about Muslims.

[1032004]

9 hours ago, Caveira said:

I don’t know who the racist white old dude in this video is.   But this is at least person #2 on cnn blatantly lying.   But.  It’s on cnn discussing people having pics of the black guy.   I don’t know who “Johnny midn…” Is either.    

 

That’s a pretty blurry picture.  Based off that picture alone I wouldn’t say “possibly white” was a “blatant lie.”  But yes, they could have also said “possibly” a lot of other races too.  He’s half black half Japanese so looking at a blurry picture he could look like a lot of different races.

9 hours ago, Caveira said:

Here is msnbc describing the Colorado Molotov coctail terrorist as white too 
 

 

@1032004 his name escapes me.  What was it?   Mohamed Sabry Soliman… or something like that.     He was either from Greenwich, CT or was from Egypt.  I can’t remember.  
 

I don’t know who Ian miles is 
 

That dude did actually look white from the photo IMO.

[Bigbrog]

4 hours ago, GreatWhiteNorth said:

Because they're trying to "bury" the previous posts with new posts. Even if the new posts are nonsense.

Blasting posts about some political stooge creates enough noise to generate a couple pages of discussion.

The previous pages are, afterward, essentially "buried" because nobody reads the earlier pages of any thread.

Casually read through the posts and it will become obvious as to who is "flooding the zone" and who is posting with any type of sincerity.

You might be surprised to find out who the 'good guys' are vs who the 'bad guys' are.

You might be surprised to know I have no interest of "good guys" vs "bad guys" and who is who...apparently you do...I just posted my opinion that it seemed a little weird to be calling someone a liar over and over, especially in regard to a nobody on social media, but like I said, that is my opinion...hard stop. 

As for the first part of your response to me...um DUH!!  That happens on every freaking thread by every freaking person on here.

[1032004]

6 minutes ago, Bigbrog said:

You might be surprised to know I have no interest of "good guys" vs "bad guys" and who is who...apparently you do...I just posted my opinion that it seemed a little weird to be calling someone a liar over and over, especially in regard to a nobody on social media, but like I said, that is my opinion...hard stop. 

As for the first part of your response to me...um DUH!!  That happens on every freaking thread by every freaking person on here.

My point about @Caveira was if he lied about “not knowing” who some chick on social media is…what else has he lied about?

[Bigbrog]

Just now, 1032004 said:

My point about @Caveira was if he lied about “not knowing” who some chick on social media is…what else has he lied about?

Let me ask you...WHY would Cav lie??  What would he gain by lying about the very thing you are claiming he lied about??  Knowing her or not knowing her doesn't change anything factual about the argument now does it??  If you are so hell bent on calling people out for lying your whole day would be spent replying to RV's posts.

[1032004]

1 minute ago, Bigbrog said:

Let me ask you...WHY would Cav lie??  What would he gain by lying about the very thing you are claiming he lied about??  Knowing her or not knowing her doesn't change anything factual about the argument now does it??  If you are so hell bent on calling people out for lying your whole day would be spent replying to RV's posts.

Because he was trying to say she was a “nobody,” so him claiming he didn’t know who she was helps him argue that.

Again, my point in bringing her up in the first place, is that in July 2025, Laura Loomer is arguably more influential than CNN.  AND she said far worse than they did in terms of assuming the race of terrorists.

[JimmySpeaks]

3 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

Because he was trying to say she was a “nobody,” so him claiming he didn’t know who she was helps him argue that.

Again, my point in bringing her up in the first place, is that in July 2025, Laura Loomer is arguably more influential than CNN.  AND she said far worse than they did in terms of assuming the race of terrorists.

Sounds regurgitated to me. You hear that on the today show?  

[Bigbrog]

11 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

Because he was trying to say she was a “nobody,” so him claiming he didn’t know who she was helps him argue that.

Again, my point in bringing her up in the first place, is that in July 2025, Laura Loomer is arguably more influential than CNN.  AND she said far worse than they did in terms of assuming the race of terrorists.

Okay bud...you do you

[1032004]

24 minutes ago, JimmySpeaks said:

Sounds regurgitated to me. You hear that on the today show?  

No, I don’t watch the Today Show, nor search out clips from it.

[JimmySpeaks]

1 minute ago, 1032004 said:

No, I don’t watch the Today Show, nor search out clips from it.

You just search clips from “X”. Bahahahhahahaha

[1032004]

1 minute ago, JimmySpeaks said:

You just search clips from “X”. Bahahahhahahaha

No that’s @Caveira, and apparently doesn’t even know who he’s posting them from

[JimmySpeaks]

1 minute ago, 1032004 said:

No that’s @Caveira, and apparently doesn’t even know who he’s posting them from

That’s funny. I could have sworn I saw back to back searched “X” posts from you on another thread. One had Charlie Kirk on it with your giggles.  

[1032004]

7 minutes ago, JimmySpeaks said:

That’s funny. I could have sworn I saw back to back searched “X” posts from you on another thread. One had Charlie Kirk on it with your giggles.  

I didn’t search for those

[JimmySpeaks]

Just now, 1032004 said:

I didn’t search for those

You got em from somewhere which means ya had to go find them. Thanks for exhibiting your hypocrisy for calling people out for doing something you also do.  It’s priceless. 

[1032004]

28 minutes ago, JimmySpeaks said:

You got em from somewhere which means ya had to go find them. Thanks for exhibiting your hypocrisy for calling people out for doing something you also do.  It’s priceless. 

I never said I don’t peruse Twitter. I said I don’t go searching it for clips.  And if I post something from there I usually actually know where it’s coming from. 

Edited yesterday at 02:30 PM by 1032004

[Caveira]

6 hours ago, 1032004 said:

That’s a pretty blurry picture.  Based off that picture alone I wouldn’t say “possibly white” was a “blatant lie.”

That wasn’t a blatant lie by cnn lol.  It’s like it’s in your DNA that liberals can never be in the wrong lol.  

[1032004]

Just now, Caveira said:

That wasn’t a blatant lie by cnn lol.  It’s like it’s in your DNA that liberals can never be in the wrong lol.  

Well the picture was blurry enough for people to claim he was Middle Eastern, which was also completely wrong.  There are definitely white people darker than that photo looks

[Caveira]

10 minutes ago, 1032004 said:

Well the picture was blurry enough for people to claim he was Middle Eastern, which was also completely wrong.  There are definitely white people darker than that photo looks

Sure.  Sure.   Still somehow translates to possibly white and somehow cnn did nothing wrong 

Edited 20 hours ago by Caveira

[WrestlingRasta]

7 hours ago, 1032004 said:

Yes, CNN was wrong.  

 

6 minutes ago, Caveira said:

Sure.  Sure.   Still somehow translates to possibly white and somehow cnn did nothing wrong 

 Reading comprehension.......man it's tough. 

[Caveira]

Just now, WrestlingRasta said:

 

 Reading comprehension.......man it's tough. 

I don’t memorize all yall write all the time.  And I certainly don’t re read whole threads.   Watch this:

@1032004 apologies on the cnn comment.  I didn’t realize you said that. 

[JimmySpeaks]

4 hours ago, 1032004 said:

I never said I don’t peruse Twitter. I said I don’t go searching it for clips.  And if I post something from there I usually actually know where it’s coming from. 

Usually.  Got it.  

[mspart]

It's as if CNN said "we have no idea of the race of the man but he's possibly white."   Why say it if you don't know?   Your speculation is not informative and obviously wasn't here.

mspart

[ionel]

13 minutes ago, mspart said:

It's as if CNN said "we have no idea of the race of the man but he's possibly white."  

Is white actually a race?