Why Is DOJ Meeting With Ghislane Maxwell??

[red viking]

I'm sure it's all above board. There's zero concern about her saying something about Trump. Wants to offer her a deal, solely out of the goodness of his heart. Lol. 

[headshuck]

How many years did the democrats trying to get Trump have to do that? Lol

[red viking]

2 minutes ago, headshuck said:

How many years did the democrats trying to get Trump have to do that? Lol

Please elaborate. DOJ was meeting w her during Bidens term? After she was already in prison? 

[wrestlingguy]

Why was it so easy to get her locked up but everyone else is just out running free? I wish they would just rip the band-aid off already. I am sick of the games.

[ionel]

32 minutes ago, wrestlingguy said:

Why was it so easy to get her locked up but everyone else is just out running free? I wish they would just rip the band-aid off already. I am sick of the games.

^^^ this ^^^

[WrestlingRasta]

I don’t think anyone is getting too excited over a DOJ that is trying to bury this story going to talk to her behind closed doors.  
 

A subpoena to take questions from Congress, members from both sides of the aisle, in public……that’s a little more juicy. 

[red viking]

1 hour ago, WrestlingRasta said:

I don’t think anyone is getting too excited over a DOJ that is trying to bury this story going to talk to her behind closed doors.  
 

A subpoena to take questions from Congress, members from both sides of the aisle, in public……that’s a little more juicy. 

Well, I think its interesting that they want to get to her before congress does. 

[Caveira]

36 minutes ago, red viking said:

Well, I think its interesting that they want to get to her before congress does. 

Didn’t congress already have a bit of time ?   I mean.   5 years almost no.   4b+1T

[ionel]

2 hours ago, WrestlingRasta said:

A subpoena to take questions from Congress, members from both sides of the aisle, in public……that’s a little more juicy. 

Have you ever seen a congressional hearing that meant anything since Watergate.  It's always just a bunch of congressional critter blowhards on both sides spending 90% of their time making a statement then 10% to ask a question and never enough time to answer the question.  

[WrestlingRasta]

5 minutes ago, ionel said:

Have you ever seen a congressional hearing that meant anything since Watergate.  It's always just a bunch of congressional critter blowhards on both sides spending 90% of their time making a statement then 10% to ask a question and never enough time to answer the question.  

Yes and that behavior, viewed in public, is very very indicative of their actual agenda and what they are trying to accomplish with said hearing.  We learn more from their behavior than the actual words they say.   Behind closed doors, we get nothing.  And I don’t know about you but I’m not about to believe what a government official tells me what was talked about in secret.  
 

 

[mspart]

Aren't they NOT supposed to tell you?   That is how you know you shouldn't trust them. 

mspart

 

[ionel]

56 minutes ago, WrestlingRasta said:

Yes and that behavior, viewed in public, is very very indicative of their actual agenda and what they are trying to accomplish with said hearing.  We learn more from their behavior than the actual words they say.   Behind closed doors, we get nothing.  And I don’t know about you but I’m not about to believe what a government official tells me what was talked about in secret.  
 

 

Well at least we have a Democratic Republic so we can elect new reps when the current ones lie to our faces ... oh wait.  

[WrestlingRasta]

34 minutes ago, ionel said:

Well at least we have a Democratic Republic so we can elect new reps when the current ones lie to our faces ... oh wait.  

Exactly.   People want to bitch about their elected officials and ‘can’t trust the politicians’…..yet they just keep voting them in there. 

[Paul158]

24 minutes ago, WrestlingRasta said:

Exactly.   People want to bitch about their elected officials and ‘can’t trust the politicians’…..yet they just keep voting them in there. 

Won't she just plead the 5th on any or all questions? Do you think she will answer any questions of any significance?

[WrestlingRasta]

19 minutes ago, Paul158 said:

Won't she just plead the 5th on any or all questions? Do you think she will answer any questions of any significance?

No idea.  I mean she’s already convicted so I don’t know what she could say the might incriminate herself.  (The whole point of pleading the 5th)
 

But I don’t think we’ll hear a true, full representation of the meeting no matter what. 

Edited Friday at 12:37 AM by WrestlingRasta

[Paul158]

5 minutes ago, WrestlingRasta said:

No idea.  I mean she’s already convicted so I don’t know what she could say the might incriminate herself.  (The whole point of pleading the 5th)
 

But I don’t think we’ll hear a true, full representation of the meeting no matter what. 

If there is any indication that she might give up some meaningful information is there chance that we might find her in her cell dead from hanging herself.

[red viking]

She could make a deal w Trump. Agrees to keep her mouth shut in exchange for something. 

[Caveira]

Just now, red viking said:

She could make a deal w Trump. Agrees to keep her mouth shut in exchange for something. 

If you’re right. It’s politics.  More than likely give me 5-10 Ds and put their heads on spits than what you’re implying.   

[red viking]

7 minutes ago, Caveira said:

If you’re right. It’s politics.  More than likely give me 5-10 Ds and put their heads on spits than what you’re implying.   

He's obviously concerned about what she could say. He won't pardon her but could make her life in prison a lot more pleasant. 

Edited Friday at 01:47 AM by red viking

[Caveira]

32 minutes ago, red viking said:

He's obviously concerned about what she could say. He won't pardon her but could make her life in prison a lot more pleasant. 

I don’t believe he did bad stuff / illegal stuff to girls on Epstein island. He ran on releasing the files.    You’ll disagree on that.   To  me but he’s a special kind of stupid if he diddled girls and ran on the same thing.  He isn’t that stupid 

 

Your right.  Maxwell won’t be pardoned.  Won’t be let out.  But give me some democrat peeps to hang and I’ll put you on a country club is a possibility 

[red viking]

10 minutes ago, Caveira said:

I don’t believe he did bad stuff / illegal stuff to girls on Epstein island. He ran on releasing the files.    You’ll disagree on that.   To  me but he’s a special kind of stupid if he diddled girls and ran on the same thing.  He isn’t that stupid 

 

Your right.  Maxwell won’t be pardoned.  Won’t be let out.  But give me some democrat peeps to hang and I’ll put you on a country club is a possibility 

I agree that there isn't enough in the file to arrest him. Thats obvious to everybody. Otherwise, he would have been arrested already. However, he's in the file numerous times so it probably exposes him as a total pedo creep and may have some limited circumstantial evidence of sexual assault. 

[El Luchador]

Gizzy dropin names. She's working the system trying to get cut loose early.  At this point it's just a he said she said after the intel people destroy all the evidence.  I'm sure if she says the right names she'll be rewarded. 

[Caveira]

22 hours ago, red viking said:

probably

So much probably.  
 

There are probably martians on the moon too.   

[WrestlingRasta]

The minions sure are sweating…

[Tripnsweep]

I bet Blanche gave her a list of people for her to implicate. Like what they did to writers during the "red scare" in the 50's.