Happy Birthday - And May Every Day Be Another Wonderful Secret

[ionel]

2 minutes ago, red viking said:

https://www.wsj.com/politics/trump-jeffrey-epstein-birthday-letter-we-have-certain-things-in-common-f918d796?gaa_at=eafs&gaa_n=ASWzDAgUeZDcZ3toSUWnv1xIuBJiqwSmI5G9EbiKDRW_us2Aaq5Hp0w6BgjstxBYqdU%3D&gaa_ts=687ae973&gaa_sig=Gw2d5h88al8bbeyGh9GKPs9jM8R9ZWiVoyPzPwD-46Dp0tiTHwupeaSCmLEH8lSXWwCMsSS_cNA_LdN1rFr8eg%3D%3D

I dont have a subscription and didn't see a drawing in the accessible part. 

[red viking]

19 minutes ago, ionel said:

I dont have a subscription and didn't see a drawing in the accessible part. 

They didn't show the pic but reported exactly what it was. 

[ionel]

24 minutes ago, red viking said:

They didn't show the pic but reported exactly what it was. 

Then how do you know?

[red viking]

Just now, ionel said:

Then how do you know?

They reported it and I trust WSJ that they aren't going to make up bs, especially about wingers. 

[WrestlingRasta]

Because many, many people are perfectly fine these days in the ease and comfort of being told what to think. 

[red viking]

5 minutes ago, WrestlingRasta said:

Because many, many people are perfectly fine these days in the ease and comfort of being told what to think. 

Wingers constantly assume conspiracies anytime they hear something they don't like. Good to see that some are starting to see through the bs. Have a long way to go gotta get out of the fox/breitbart echo chamber. 

[Caveira]

55 minutes ago, red viking said:

They reported it and I trust WSJ that they aren't going to make up bs, especially about wingers. 

They would have no reason to hate Trump 

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-lawsuit-wall-street-journal-jeffrey-epstein-birthday-letter/

[red viking]

4 minutes ago, Caveira said:

They would have no reason to hate Trump 

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-lawsuit-wall-street-journal-jeffrey-epstein-birthday-letter/

He will lose. He lies about literally everything,  so of course he will deny it. He has no choice but to sue. Anything less is basically an admission which he just refuses to do for anything. You gonna,trust Trumptard over WSJ? LMAO. 

Edited Saturday at 02:17 AM by red viking

[Caveira]

3 minutes ago, red viking said:

He will lose. He lies about literally everything,  so of course he will deny it. He has no choice but to sue. Anything less is basically an admission which he just refuses to do for anything. You gonna,trust Trumptard over WSJ? LMAO. 

Did I say that ?   I said they have reasons to hate him. 

[ionel]

1 hour ago, red viking said:

They reported it and I trust WSJ that they aren't going to make up bs, especially about wingers. 

What did they report, who was the drawing of, how do we know it was a woman, who drew it, how was it sent, certified mail, FedEx, other?

Maybe you can post the full article so we can all see the proof and this drawing? 

Edited Saturday at 02:43 AM by ionel

[GreatWhiteNorth]

9 hours ago, headshuck said:

WSJ is just jealous they don’t get as many fake news mentions that CNN and MSNBC get.

You mean Rupert Murdoch's WSJ. The ultra conservative Rupert Murdoch.

The same Murdoch family that owns FOX News.

Are you calling WSJ fake news? That's quite a twist. Did you take your meds today?

[red viking]

8 hours ago, ionel said:

What did they report, who was the drawing of, how do we know it was a woman, who drew it, how was it sent, certified mail, FedEx, other?

Maybe you can post the full article so we can all see the proof and this drawing? 

Don't need proof. WSJ doesn't make bs up, like Fox. Both owned by Rupert Murdock but he reserves his bs propaganda all for fox.  I guarantee it's true. He can double down, sue, etc. That's just part for the course w him. He'll be exposed as a liar, once again. 

Edited Saturday at 11:39 AM by red viking

[WrestlingRasta]

You are seriously no different than the people you pretend to despise.  Don’t need to read for yourself or listen to someone in their own words, all you need is to be told what to think and hear what you want to hear and you’re good, you ‘guarantee’ it to be true.  Can’t imagine why anyone wants to look at the world through such a small window.  

Edited Saturday at 11:43 AM by WrestlingRasta

[red viking]

Just now, WrestlingRasta said:

You are seriously no different than the people you pretend to despise.  Don’t need to read for yourself or listen to someone in your own words, all you need is to be told what to think and hear what you want to hear and you’re good, you ‘guarantee’ it to be true.  Can’t imagine why anyone wants to look at the world through such a small window.  

WSJ is a reputable source. There's nothing more to say. This isnt like some random bs that wingers read on the internet. 

Let's wait and see, but WSJ has a reputation of not making crap up. They actually have standards. 

[WrestlingRasta]

12 minutes ago, red viking said:

WSJ is a reputable source. There's nothing more to say. This isnt like some random bs that wingers read on the internet. 

Let's wait and see, but WSJ has a reputation of not making crap up. They actually have standards. 

I wasn’t talking about the WSJ, I was talking about you. 

[headshuck]

Could you post a link to the letter that the drawing was included with?

[Wrestleknownothing]

It is very weird that your defense boils down to "it is behind a paywall so it means nothing"

[headshuck]

No defense, looking for better offense. Behind a paywall is the best you can do?

They allowed Trump to win multiple elections before bringing up the letter?

[WrestlingRasta]

26 minutes ago, headshuck said:

No defense, looking for better offense. Behind a paywall is the best you can do?

They allowed Trump to win multiple elections before bringing up the letter?

In all honesty the WSJ releasing this now was pretty suspicious.  But then what became more suspicious was Trump responding to it by saying he’s never drawn a picture in his life.     Ummmmmm…

[headshuck]

In all honesty the WSJ releasing this now was pretty suspicious.  But then what became more suspicious was Trump responding to it by saying he’s never drawn a picture in his life.     Ummmmmm…

Do you think he baited them into publishing the story? His lawyers had the $10B lawsuit ready to go.

[WrestlingRasta]

2 minutes ago, headshuck said:

Do you think he baited them into publishing the story? His lawyers had the $10B lawsuit ready to go.

I’m not sure.  
I’m not sure what the so called letter is or isn’t.  
I’m not sure if he’ll actually file the lawsuit. 
I’m not sure if he files he’d win. 
 

I do know telling blatant lies in his response won’t help him win the lawsuit.  

[headshuck]

He’s already recollected the building sketches from 20 years ago and clarified that he’s specifically never drawn naked lady doodles so he might have recovered on that front.

[Wrestleknownothing]

8 minutes ago, headshuck said:

He’s already recollected the building sketches from 20 years ago and clarified that he’s specifically never drawn naked lady doodles so he might have recovered on that front.

And yet he cannot remeber who appointed Jerome Powell

[WrestlingRasta]

18 minutes ago, headshuck said:

He’s already recollected the building sketches from 20 years ago and clarified that he’s specifically never drawn naked lady doodles so he might have recovered on that front.

Well, as long as he clarified after the lie was so easily disproven.  All good. 

[El Luchador]

One thing we know for sure, the left would never fabricate a completely fake story and hand it to the press and then without verification they would run it. This would never happen. I think considering the totality of the body of work of the legacy media, we need to give them the benefit of the doubt on this. We also know when the left does fabricate a story they run it by a grand jury first.