So where's starocci?

[Wrestleknownothing]

2 minutes ago, ionel said:

And why haven't any?

How would I know? Sounds like a question for the reporters. Ask them and get back to us with their answers. 

[ionel]

21 minutes ago, Wrestleknownothing said:

What question has a reporter posed to him? As near as I can tell, none. 

 

13 minutes ago, Wrestleknownothing said:

How would I know? Sounds like a question for the reporters. Ask them and get back to us with their answers. 

Based on your response above thought maybe you had inside intel.  

Let me know when happy valley journalist set up a press briefing for random intermat posters to ask quedtions and i'll be sure to submit a few. 

[Coastal]

25 minutes ago, Interviewed_at_Weehawken said:

1. This post is in very poor taste, but also demonstrates how people are attacked for speaking out or reporting  against sex crimes

2. My understanding was that her site was clothed and she was more than happy to take peoples money for it.  However, you'd probably know better than me.

 

1. When people falsely imply others committed sex crimes, they deserve all the scorn they can get.   

2. Your understanding is incorrect.

 

[Interviewed_at_Weehawken]

5 minutes ago, Coastal said:

 

1. When people falsely imply others committed sex crimes, they deserve all the scorn they can get.   

2. Your understanding is incorrect.

 

Low class poster.

[Wrestleknownothing]

1 hour ago, Wrestleknownothing said:

How would I know? Sounds like a question for the reporters. Ask them and get back to us with their answers. 

People keep trying to prove with the negative. The lack of evidence is suddenly evidence of something. Someone on here claimed they knew ESPN was looking into it. Maybe dig that guy up and ask. 

[bnwtwg]

1 hour ago, Wrestleknownothing said:

People keep trying to prove with the negative. The lack of evidence is suddenly evidence of something. Someone on here claimed they knew ESPN was looking into it. Maybe dig that guy up and ask. 

 You can @ me next time. I said literally all I could on the matter because the only info I had is that at least two people, including one ESPN journalist, had been assigned to look into it. The furthest speculation I said was "I bet we find out very soon if this story has real legs to it."

 

[alex1fly]

I have no vendetta against PSU but I'm reminded that PSU is experienced in covering up scandals, Cael is used to keeping his mouth shut, and boosters tend to value winning over anything. They know what they're doing and nobody involved with PSU has anything to gain from pursuing this. Maybe the State will get involved but probably not.

[Hammerlock3]

4 hours ago, Coastal said:

What are you going to ask him..."Have you seen all Syd Bartlett's XXX rated only fans?" "Did you really need to see the size of her vajayjay?" "Is she really that big of a skank?".   

 

No I think he's the head of a program that has had significant scandals and shouldn't be allowed to just act like they're everyone else's problem. Which would be nice because it would make it less tempting to run with narratives along the lines of "Cael doesn't coach character at all will cheat to win without remorse" which is a wide open lane right now. 

Edited 1 hour ago by Hammerlock3

[Wrestleknownothing]

1 hour ago, bnwtwg said:

 You can @ me next time. I said literally all I could on the matter because the only info I had is that at least two people, including one ESPN journalist, had been assigned to look into it. The furthest speculation I said was "I bet we find out very soon if this story has real legs to it."

 

If I had remembered who it was I would have. Thanks for sharing.

[Wrestleknownothing]

30 minutes ago, Hammerlock3 said:

No I think he's the head of a program that has had significant scandals and shouldn't be allowed to just act like they're everyone else's problem. Which would be nice because it would make it less tempting to run with narratives along the lines of "Cael doesn't coach character at all will cheat to win without remorse" which is a wide open lane right now. 

Certainly the school has had a huge scandal, one of the biggest, most awful ever.

But wrestlers getting nailed for PEDs, drinking, and prostitution, does not rise to the level of scandal. Unseemly, sure, but not scandalous.

The things alleged by the Bartlett's are criminal. It seems that crimes should be reported to the police and investigated by the police. And at least one was. The police found no evidence to support the claim. Maybe it happened anyway. Some thieves get away with it. And some accused of crimes, never commit any.

Let's face it. Starocci is unlikeable. Bartlett is very likeable. Sometimes opinions flow from that.

[bnwtwg]

1 hour ago, Wrestleknownothing said:

If I had remembered who it was I would have. Thanks for sharing.

My bad thought it was a dig. I don't mind putting my name on what I said