Will we be using the CBU-57 bomb or will Iran get to the table and negotiate. Time is running out.

[scourge165]

1 hour ago, Scouts Honor said:

i only see one question mark

so i will answer that question

yes i can answer your question.

so stop being a clown.

You didn't and you will never answer my question.

MY question was so extremely simple, but in order to answer it, you'd have to admit you're a liar. 

 

Why do you NOT believe the 2018 report that Iran was abiding by the agreement, but then turn around and use that very same source to say they're at 60% enrichment(and they need to get to 90%...and they also need a delivery system, but I understand you only understand what's on Twitter.

 

(And don't worry, I know there is zero chance you'll justify believing the IAEA AND the US Sec of State in 2018, but you believe the IAEA now). 

 

[scourge165]

4 hours ago, Scouts Honor said:

go ahead, tell us how you can use it from 2018, but discount it now

And ONCE AGAIN... to show the difference between me and Scout(and since Scout apparently hasn't picked up on this) but I've never questioned the current report. I absolutely said...from the start of this thread, once we pulled out, they've been working toward a bomb. 

 

Scout is the one who believes the IAEA in one case, but not in the other.

[Scouts Honor]

not that i want to go into iran

but just for all the peanuts out there...

this isn't our war etc etc 

[scourge165]

So... yet again @Scouts Honor is incapable of articulating why he agrees with the 2025 IAEA report, but claims he knows for sure the IAEA was lying in 2018(Along with the US State Department). 

 

That's about a page now and he can't answer a simple question. Not that it's a big deal, it's SUPER obvious why he can't. one fits his talking points and the other doesn't. 

 

 

And as always, I'm neve sure why people screen show an article rather than just posting it here. 

-It's almost like they don't actually read the articles and prefer to remain ignorant;

 

https://taskandpurpose.com/news/iran-attacks-us-military-iraq-syria-biden/?utm_source=chatgpt.com

 

It also says;

Quote

 

Biden took office 26 months ago, so the total of 83 attacks translates to an average of little more than three attacks against U.S. troops per month. By comparison, Iranian-backed militia groups attacked U.S. troops several times per day during the 2007 Iraq surge, said retired Army Col. Peter Mansoor, who served as executive officer for the commander of all U.S. troops in Iraq at the time.

Even though attacks against U.S. troops by Iranian forces have decreased significantly since the surge, the total number of attacks is still significant, Mansoor told Task & Purpose.

 

 

Not sure this is a compelling argument that this is "our war," and we've attacked those same groups many more times then they've attacked us.... or why don't we go after Jordan ore the places these Iranian backed groups actually live?

 

 

-Either way, don't be a coward Scout, answer the question or just say you're a hypocrite. 

-Also, the screenshot with no link so you can only see the headline with no context is quintessential Scout/Jimmy stuff. 

[Scouts Honor]

not a coward

i just really don't care for your opinion

[Scouts Honor]

everything you need to know about the IAEA and people like scroogie

 

[red viking]

Tulsi Gabbard even admitted they werent close. 

Nothing unique about the timing of Israel's attack except they knew trumptard would back them no matter what they did. 

[Offthemat]

22 hours ago, scourge165 said:

that... you're now taking as gospel,

I never take anything the gov’t says at face value.  They always have a taint. 

[Offthemat]

I knew there was another level that had been reported. 
 

UN report: Uranium particles enriched to 83.7% found in Iran

 

https://apnews.com/article/iran-nuclear-uranium-enrichment-germany-israel-c9b3669a7721bd8929d465117c81b70f

[Paul158]

2 hours ago, Offthemat said:

I knew there was another level that had been reported. 
 

UN report: Uranium particles enriched to 83.7% found in Iran

 

https://apnews.com/article/iran-nuclear-uranium-enrichment-germany-israel-c9b3669a7721bd8929d465117c81b70f

That is slightly higher than the 3 to 5 percent needed to make electricity. Maybe they are making a bomb or something.

[Offthemat]

10 minutes ago, Paul158 said:

That is slightly higher than the 3 to 5 percent needed to make electricity. Maybe they are making a bomb or something.

The AP and IAEA may not be reputable enough for left wangers. 

[Paul158]

US just dropped bombs on 3 sites in Iran.

[scourge165]

15 hours ago, Scouts Honor said:

not a coward

i just really don't care for your opinion

LOL... because you can't without making a fool of yourself.

By the way, my Norton blocks the Tweets you send... but shockingly, you're once again leaning on someone else to articulate a point for you. 

 

6 hours ago, Offthemat said:

The AP and IAEA may not be reputable enough for left wangers. 

 

That's funny, they're PERFECTLY valid sources for ME.

 

YOU all were the ones claiming Iran "wasn't serious" and that Iran wasnt' following the agreement in 2018 when Trump pulled out...despite those same sources saying otherwise.